Main Menu

Do we own bitshares.com?

Started by Rune, October 20, 2014, 04:51:43 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Print
Go Down Pages 1 2 All
User actions

jae208

#11
October 24, 2014, 06:00:58 AM
No one cares about Bitshares.com though. There is no need for Bitshares.com when we have a distributive DNS system that will most certainly replace the status quo.
[url="http://bitsharestutorials.com"]http://bitsharestutorials.com[/url] A work in progress
Subscribe to the Youtube Channel
[url="https://www.youtube.com/user/BitsharesTutorials"]https://www.youtube.com/user/BitsharesTutorials[/url]

BitShares.com

#10
October 24, 2014, 05:55:25 AM
Correct, "we" don't. I do, however 8)

Rune

#9
October 24, 2014, 05:52:58 AM
Quote from: BitShares.com on October 24, 2014, 04:05:45 AM
Actually, BitShares.com would not be able to be seized because of the 2003 registration date.

By the way, I'm liking this new rebranding thing that's been going on :)

So does this mean we don't own the domain?

BitShares.com

#8
October 24, 2014, 04:05:45 AM
Actually, BitShares.com would not be able to be seized because of the 2003 registration date.

By the way, I'm liking this new rebranding thing that's been going on :)

toast

#7
October 20, 2014, 10:08:44 PM
Actually the bitshares trademark was rejected outright for everyone forever says Dan

So I guess if they try to pull any shit then they can just incur the wrath of anonymous cryptonerds which is quite scary IMO
Do not use this post as information for making any important decisions. The only agreements I ever make are informal and non-binding. Take the same precautions as when dealing with a compromised account, scammer, sockpuppet, etc.

arhag

#6
October 20, 2014, 05:27:41 PM
Quote from: xeroc on October 20, 2014, 05:26:41 PM
Quote from: arhag on October 20, 2014, 05:20:25 PM
I totally understand how this all makes sense from a strategic and business perspective, but it is kind of ironic, no? Considering the philosophy behind .p2p and all. I just find that amusing.
you need to link to the old/classical world to build a bridge to the new bright future :)

Yeah, yeah I know. You gotta work within the system to change it. Still thought it was worth pointing it out.

xeroc

#5
October 20, 2014, 05:26:41 PM
Quote from: arhag on October 20, 2014, 05:20:25 PM
I totally understand how this all makes sense from a strategic and business perspective, but it is kind of ironic, no? Considering the philosophy behind .p2p and all. I just find that amusing.
you need to link to the old/classical world to build a bridge to the new bright future :)

arhag

#4
October 20, 2014, 05:20:25 PM
Quote from: toast on October 20, 2014, 04:54:18 PM
AFAIK invictus owns the BitShares trademark so you could pursue traditional means of getting it back when it matters

I totally understand how this all makes sense from a strategic and business perspective, but it is kind of ironic, no? Considering the philosophy behind .p2p and all. I just find that amusing.

xeroc

#3
October 20, 2014, 05:15:37 PM
yhea .. but bitshare.com (without s) .. is a different story... unfortunatelly

toast

#2
October 20, 2014, 04:54:18 PM
AFAIK invictus owns the BitShares trademark so you could pursue traditional means of getting it back when it matters
Do not use this post as information for making any important decisions. The only agreements I ever make are informal and non-binding. Take the same precautions as when dealing with a compromised account, scammer, sockpuppet, etc.

Rune

#1
October 20, 2014, 04:51:43 PM
Was just thinking about the bitcoin.com fiasco, and wondering if the same thing will happen to us.
Print
Go Up Pages 1 2 All
User actions