Author Topic: Peter Todd: "Regulators would be smart to shutdown Counterparty"  (Read 3778 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline luckybit

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2921
    • View Profile
  • BitShares: Luckybit
I wonder if this was one of the reasons for bytemasters recent push to allow a DAC to self fund itself. Would make an awful lot of sense through that lens.

Is the SEC vulnerable to regulatory capture?

https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/2k055g/regulators_would_be_smart_to_shutdown/clgqvxr
https://metaexchange.info | Bitcoin<->Altcoin exchange | Instant | Safe | Low spreads

Offline Method-X

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1131
  • VIRAL
    • View Profile
    • Learn to code
  • BitShares: methodx
I wonder if this was one of the reasons for bytemasters recent push to allow a DAC to self fund itself. Would make an awful lot of sense through that lens.

Offline luckybit

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2921
    • View Profile
  • BitShares: Luckybit
Quote
Peter Todd
‏@petertoddbtc
Regulators would be smart to shutdown Counterparty, a non-IPO'd currency req'd for tech reasons, and force the insecure 2-way-peg sidechains
Quote
Peter Todd ‏@petertoddbtc  5h5 hours ago
@coolbearcjs Rumour is that the SEC and others will be fining/maybe even jailing many players in the BTC crowd funded space.

https://twitter.com/petertoddbtc/status/524947758528999424
« Last Edit: October 22, 2014, 08:59:32 pm by luckybit »
https://metaexchange.info | Bitcoin<->Altcoin exchange | Instant | Safe | Low spreads