Sparkle Alpha Test Network Live: Mining to be Honored in Real Network

[arubi]

I think he will honor it by address, so it's better to save the private key.

Never delete private keys.
Ever.

Also, one backup is zero backups.

[joele]

I think he will honor it by address, so it's better to save the private key.

[arubi]

...
All blocks from the prior chain will be honored as well as the new chain.
...

Can't see my balance from the previous blockchain...

I think he didn't honor the blocks in the testnet genesis. It will just be honored in the final version.

Oh well, good enough.
Thanks.

[Frodo]

...
All blocks from the prior chain will be honored as well as the new chain.
...

Can't see my balance from the previous blockchain...

I think he didn't honor the blocks in the testnet genesis. It will just be honored in the final version.

[iHashFury]

Mining is working fine on my dedicated server. But I am having an error message constantly

Code: [Select]

I am disconnecting peer x.x.x.x.:x for reason: You offered me a list of more sync blocks than could possibly exist


Same here - I think it  should work itself out when everyone updates

[arubi]

...
All blocks from the prior chain will be honored as well as the new chain.
...

Can't see my balance from the previous blockchain...

Mining is working fine on my dedicated server. But I am having an error message constantly

Code: [Select]

I am disconnecting peer x.x.x.x.:x for reason: You offered me a list of more sync blocks than could possibly exist


Me too

[monsterer]

If there is a windows binary, it would be great.

 

[clayop]

If there is a windows binary, it would be great.

[clayop]

Mining is working fine on my dedicated server. But I am having an error message constantly

Code: [Select]

I am disconnecting peer x.x.x.x.:x for reason: You offered me a list of more sync blocks than could possibly exist


[smith7800]

Tried to compile the latest

n file included from /home/delegate/Sparkle/tests/dev_tests.cpp:3:0:
/home/delegate/Sparkle/tests/dev_fixture.hpp: In instantiation of ‘void chain_fixture::produce_block(T) [with T = std::shared_ptr<bts::client::client>]’:
/home/delegate/Sparkle/tests/dev_tests.cpp:55:25:   required from here
/home/delegate/Sparkle/tests/dev_fixture.hpp:231:59: error: ‘struct bts::blockchain::full_block’ has no member named ‘nonce’
       while( b.difficulty() < SPK_MIN_DIFFICULTY ) b.nonce++;
                                                           ^
make[2]: *** [tests/CMakeFiles/dev_tests.dir/dev_tests.cpp.o] Error 1
make[1]: *** [tests/CMakeFiles/dev_tests.dir/all] Error 2
make: *** [all] Error 2

Same here.  Anybody know a fix?

For now I'd ignore that. It's an error in the tests, not in the actual client.

Looks like just an orphaned test that didn't get removed or updated.

Thanks.  It's working, though the blocks seem to be coming mighty quickly (currently at 2251)

[Troglodactyl]

Tried to compile the latest

n file included from /home/delegate/Sparkle/tests/dev_tests.cpp:3:0:
/home/delegate/Sparkle/tests/dev_fixture.hpp: In instantiation of ‘void chain_fixture::produce_block(T) [with T = std::shared_ptr<bts::client::client>]’:
/home/delegate/Sparkle/tests/dev_tests.cpp:55:25:   required from here
/home/delegate/Sparkle/tests/dev_fixture.hpp:231:59: error: ‘struct bts::blockchain::full_block’ has no member named ‘nonce’
       while( b.difficulty() < SPK_MIN_DIFFICULTY ) b.nonce++;
                                                           ^
make[2]: *** [tests/CMakeFiles/dev_tests.dir/dev_tests.cpp.o] Error 1
make[1]: *** [tests/CMakeFiles/dev_tests.dir/all] Error 2
make: *** [all] Error 2

Same here.  Anybody know a fix?

For now I'd ignore that. It's an error in the tests, not in the actual client.

Looks like just an orphaned test that didn't get removed or updated.

[joele]

Tried to compile the latest

n file included from /home/delegate/Sparkle/tests/dev_tests.cpp:3:0:
/home/delegate/Sparkle/tests/dev_fixture.hpp: In instantiation of ‘void chain_fixture::produce_block(T) [with T = std::shared_ptr<bts::client::client>]’:
/home/delegate/Sparkle/tests/dev_tests.cpp:55:25:   required from here
/home/delegate/Sparkle/tests/dev_fixture.hpp:231:59: error: ‘struct bts::blockchain::full_block’ has no member named ‘nonce’
       while( b.difficulty() < SPK_MIN_DIFFICULTY ) b.nonce++;
                                                           ^
make[2]: *** [tests/CMakeFiles/dev_tests.dir/dev_tests.cpp.o] Error 1
make[1]: *** [tests/CMakeFiles/dev_tests.dir/all] Error 2
make: *** [all] Error 2

Same here.  Anybody know a fix?

Same problem to one of my server.

[smith7800]

Tried to compile the latest

n file included from /home/delegate/Sparkle/tests/dev_tests.cpp:3:0:
/home/delegate/Sparkle/tests/dev_fixture.hpp: In instantiation of ‘void chain_fixture::produce_block(T) [with T = std::shared_ptr<bts::client::client>]’:
/home/delegate/Sparkle/tests/dev_tests.cpp:55:25:   required from here
/home/delegate/Sparkle/tests/dev_fixture.hpp:231:59: error: ‘struct bts::blockchain::full_block’ has no member named ‘nonce’
       while( b.difficulty() < SPK_MIN_DIFFICULTY ) b.nonce++;
                                                           ^
make[2]: *** [tests/CMakeFiles/dev_tests.dir/dev_tests.cpp.o] Error 1
make[1]: *** [tests/CMakeFiles/dev_tests.dir/all] Error 2
make: *** [all] Error 2

Same here.  Anybody know a fix?

[Troglodactyl]

Confirmed alpha.5 is working for me.

[joele]

I am starting a new test network with a new mining algorithm based on ECC signature. 

Your wallet must be unlocked to mine with the private key.  This is designed to maximize decentralization and eliminate mining pools.

All blocks from the prior chain will be honored as well as the new chain.

Difficulty adjusts every 20 blocks and is rate limited to +/- 2%

Excellent.  Will it still be at https://github.com/sparkle5/Sparkle?

This