Author Topic: Sparkle Alpha Test Network Live: Mining to be Honored in Real Network  (Read 27582 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline cgafeng

Code: [Select]
cgafeng (unlocked) >>> getinfo
{
  "blockchain_head_block_num": 1123,
  "blockchain_head_block_age": "53 seconds old",
  "blockchain_head_block_timestamp": "2014-11-29T02:35:55",
  "blockchain_difficulty": 2809,
  "blockchain_confirmation_requirement": 6,
  "blockchain_share_supply": "2,000,056,149.79457 SPK",
  "blockchain_random_seed": "d7ad990009893245b4272208edf05bf761a442a4",
  "client_data_dir": "E:/code/Sparkle/vs2013/programs/client/data",
  "client_version": "alpha.4-testnet-65",
  "network_num_connections": 3,
  "network_num_connections_max": 200,
  "network_chain_downloader_running": false,
  "network_chain_downloader_blocks_remaining": null,
  "ntp_time": "2014-11-29T02:36:48",
  "ntp_time_error": 0.775424,
  "wallet_open": true,
  "wallet_unlocked": true,
  "wallet_unlocked_until": "12 days in the future",
  "wallet_unlocked_until_timestamp": "2014-12-10T16:17:33",
  "wallet_last_scanned_block_timestamp": "2014-11-29T02:35:55",
  "wallet_scan_progress": "100.00 %",
  "wallet_block_production_enabled": true,
  "blockchain_average_delegate_participation": null,
  "blockchain_next_round_timestamp": null,
  "wallet_next_block_production_timestamp": null
}

looks like work, any information that it is mining or not?
and how much connect need to mine?
BTC:1EYwcZ9cYVj6C9LMLafdcjK9wicVMDV376

Offline sparkles

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 107
    • View Profile
could this work on windows?
just build like bitshares?

Yes. It should work on windows if you build like BTS.   If you can build a windows release that would be very helpful.   

Offline cgafeng

could this work on windows?
just build like bitshares?
BTC:1EYwcZ9cYVj6C9LMLafdcjK9wicVMDV376

Offline toast

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4001
    • View Profile
  • BitShares: nikolai
Do not use this post as information for making any important decisions. The only agreements I ever make are informal and non-binding. Take the same precautions as when dealing with a compromised account, scammer, sockpuppet, etc.

Offline sparkles

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 107
    • View Profile

iHashFury

  • Guest
162.243.160.72:52620
104.131.0.131:1765
98.240.161.119:59647
104.236.44.210:41655
162.213.195.203:1765

Thank you  8)

Offline sparkles

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 107
    • View Profile
162.243.160.72:52620
104.131.0.131:1765
98.240.161.119:59647
104.236.44.210:41655
162.213.195.203:1765

iHashFury

  • Guest
Are there any nodes yet, that we can manually add?

EDIT: Okay it already found connections by itself.

Could you list some peers please?

Offline Frodo

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 351
    • View Profile
  • BitShares: frodo
Are there any nodes yet, that we can manually add?

EDIT: Okay it already found connections by itself.
« Last Edit: November 28, 2014, 10:48:33 pm by Frodo »

Offline sparkles

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 107
    • View Profile
I fixed a bug in difficulty adjustment that will cause a hard fork.  There are only about 4 clients connected so the fork is effective immediately.   It is backward compatible with all existing blocks, the difficulty should adjust better going forward.

Offline toast

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4001
    • View Profile
  • BitShares: nikolai
Do not use this post as information for making any important decisions. The only agreements I ever make are informal and non-binding. Take the same precautions as when dealing with a compromised account, scammer, sockpuppet, etc.

Offline sparkles

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 107
    • View Profile
Code: [Select]
HEIGHT  TIMESTAMP           SIGNING DELEGATE                # TXS   SIZE    LATENCY PROCESSING TIME
===================================================================================================
162     2014-11-28T21:36:47 SPK9wuGT1w3JUKZNCmwwUyFgh8B9... 0       92      0       0.003318       
161     2014-11-28T21:36:05 SPK7rYgHnMKDYHxuXnN129yVceGY... 0       92      0       0.004409       
160     2014-11-28T21:34:00 SPK7rYgHnMKDYHxuXnN129yVceGY... 0       92      0       0.000366       
159     2014-11-28T21:33:47 SPK9wuGT1w3JUKZNCmwwUyFgh8B9... 0       92      0       0.000386       
158     2014-11-28T21:33:35 SPK9wuGT1w3JUKZNCmwwUyFgh8B9... 0       92      0       0.000445

Are you SPK7rYgHnMKDYHxuXnN129yVceGY?

Offline toast

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4001
    • View Profile
  • BitShares: nikolai
Sweet. Might want to update the tag.

Code: [Select]
miner                           49.99995 SPK
Do not use this post as information for making any important decisions. The only agreements I ever make are informal and non-binding. Take the same precautions as when dealing with a compromised account, scammer, sockpuppet, etc.

Offline sparkles

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 107
    • View Profile
Code: [Select]
(gdb) r
Starting program: /root/sparkle/programs/client/sparkle_client
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
Using host libthread_db library "/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libthread_db.so.1".
terminate called after throwing an instance of 'std::bad_alloc'
  what():  std::bad_alloc

Program received signal SIGABRT, Aborted.
0x00007ffff65f5bb9 in __GI_raise (sig=sig@entry=6) at ../nptl/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/raise.c:56
56 ../nptl/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/raise.c: No such file or directory.
(gdb) bt
#0  0x00007ffff65f5bb9 in __GI_raise (sig=sig@entry=6) at ../nptl/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/raise.c:56
#1  0x00007ffff65f8fc8 in __GI_abort () at abort.c:89
#2  0x00007ffff6f016b5 in __gnu_cxx::__verbose_terminate_handler() () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libstdc++.so.6
#3  0x00007ffff6eff836 in ?? () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libstdc++.so.6
#4  0x00007ffff6eff863 in std::terminate() () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libstdc++.so.6
#5  0x00007ffff6effaf6 in __cxa_rethrow () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libstdc++.so.6
#6  0x0000000000859262 in std::__shared_count<(__gnu_cxx::_Lock_policy)2>::__shared_count<bts::client::client, std::allocator<bts::client::client>, char const (&) [15]> (this=<optimized out>, __a=...) at /usr/include/c++/4.8/bits/shared_ptr_base.h:509
#7  0x00000000008592b6 in std::__shared_ptr<bts::client::client, (__gnu_cxx::_Lock_policy)2>::__shared_ptr<std::allocator<bts::client::client>, char const (&) [15]> (this=this@entry=0x7fffffffe110, __tag=__tag@entry=..., __a=...)
    at /usr/include/c++/4.8/bits/shared_ptr_base.h:957
#8  0x0000000000856070 in shared_ptr<std::allocator<bts::client::client>, char const (&) [15]> (__a=..., __tag=..., this=0x7fffffffe110) at /usr/include/c++/4.8/bits/shared_ptr.h:316
#9  allocate_shared<bts::client::client, std::allocator<bts::client::client>, char const (&) [15]> (__a=...) at /usr/include/c++/4.8/bits/shared_ptr.h:598
#10 make_shared<bts::client::client, char const (&) [15]> () at /usr/include/c++/4.8/bits/shared_ptr.h:614
#11 main (argc=1, argv=0x7fffffffe288) at /root/sparkle/programs/client/main.cpp:31
(gdb)

 :(

Fixed.. 

Offline toast

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4001
    • View Profile
  • BitShares: nikolai
Code: [Select]
(gdb) r
Starting program: /root/sparkle/programs/client/sparkle_client
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
Using host libthread_db library "/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libthread_db.so.1".
terminate called after throwing an instance of 'std::bad_alloc'
  what():  std::bad_alloc

Program received signal SIGABRT, Aborted.
0x00007ffff65f5bb9 in __GI_raise (sig=sig@entry=6) at ../nptl/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/raise.c:56
56 ../nptl/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/raise.c: No such file or directory.
(gdb) bt
#0  0x00007ffff65f5bb9 in __GI_raise (sig=sig@entry=6) at ../nptl/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/raise.c:56
#1  0x00007ffff65f8fc8 in __GI_abort () at abort.c:89
#2  0x00007ffff6f016b5 in __gnu_cxx::__verbose_terminate_handler() () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libstdc++.so.6
#3  0x00007ffff6eff836 in ?? () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libstdc++.so.6
#4  0x00007ffff6eff863 in std::terminate() () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libstdc++.so.6
#5  0x00007ffff6effaf6 in __cxa_rethrow () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libstdc++.so.6
#6  0x0000000000859262 in std::__shared_count<(__gnu_cxx::_Lock_policy)2>::__shared_count<bts::client::client, std::allocator<bts::client::client>, char const (&) [15]> (this=<optimized out>, __a=...) at /usr/include/c++/4.8/bits/shared_ptr_base.h:509
#7  0x00000000008592b6 in std::__shared_ptr<bts::client::client, (__gnu_cxx::_Lock_policy)2>::__shared_ptr<std::allocator<bts::client::client>, char const (&) [15]> (this=this@entry=0x7fffffffe110, __tag=__tag@entry=..., __a=...)
    at /usr/include/c++/4.8/bits/shared_ptr_base.h:957
#8  0x0000000000856070 in shared_ptr<std::allocator<bts::client::client>, char const (&) [15]> (__a=..., __tag=..., this=0x7fffffffe110) at /usr/include/c++/4.8/bits/shared_ptr.h:316
#9  allocate_shared<bts::client::client, std::allocator<bts::client::client>, char const (&) [15]> (__a=...) at /usr/include/c++/4.8/bits/shared_ptr.h:598
#10 make_shared<bts::client::client, char const (&) [15]> () at /usr/include/c++/4.8/bits/shared_ptr.h:614
#11 main (argc=1, argv=0x7fffffffe288) at /root/sparkle/programs/client/main.cpp:31
(gdb)

 :(
Do not use this post as information for making any important decisions. The only agreements I ever make are informal and non-binding. Take the same precautions as when dealing with a compromised account, scammer, sockpuppet, etc.