scan failure? Bad address

[matt608]

Cusknee has a problem which sounds related to this - can anyone help? He voted and his funds never came back.
https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=11847.msg159613#msg159613

[toast]

As long as delegates continue signing block it is a minor issue .. imho

To me a crash bug is still serious. Something which causes the delegates to crash is worse, of course. :)

Very interesting.  Looks like something that was already fixed for our next release.  We will get a new release out today that addresses this issue among several others.

Thanks , need it ASAP ,  because it's the PLAY snapshot time .

https://github.com/BitShares/bitshares/releases/tag/v0.4.24.1

[cn-members]

As long as delegates continue signing block it is a minor issue .. imho

To me a crash bug is still serious. Something which causes the delegates to crash is worse, of course. :)

Very interesting.  Looks like something that was already fixed for our next release.  We will get a new release out today that addresses this issue among several others.

Thanks , need it ASAP ,  because it's the PLAY snapshot time .

[bytemaster]

As long as delegates continue signing block it is a minor issue .. imho

To me a crash bug is still serious. Something which causes the delegates to crash is worse, of course. :)

Very interesting.  Looks like something that was already fixed for our next release.  We will get a new release out today that addresses this issue among several others.

[monsterer]

As long as delegates continue signing block it is a minor issue .. imho

To me a crash bug is still serious. Something which causes the delegates to crash is worse, of course. :)

[xeroc]

As long as delegates continue signing block it is a minor issue .. imho

[monsterer]

It was a minor bug with the wallet.

I like your definition of 'minor' :p

[CLains]

It was a minor bug with the wallet.

Devs already handled it, so exchanges just needs to update and we are good.  ;)

[liondani]

the problem is because somebody try a escrow transaction, but still not support by client

Code Select Expand


btsbots (unlocked) >>> blockchain_get_block 1209399
{
  "previous": "006648b96af11d06e3b6c55c8cf295d571148c51",
  "block_num": 1209399,
  "timestamp": "20141208T003100",
  "transaction_digest": "c8cf12fe3180ed901a58a0697a522f1217de72d04529bd255627a4ad6164f0f0",
  "next_secret_hash": "b4864ba1493f38fa226b9d49e404c329a73419ff",
  "previous_secret": "690d2d987911bed1ef2283a683045de12a3cdf2f",
  "delegate_signature": "206be773a62d0005d750a45dfd16a71b1a8bbb5c3b087582603c6b6f4df93acbd3bb55c0e3112e9ce02a99723088e78b8168f79f781212dd47a2a95faa701d0112",
  "user_transaction_ids": [
    "4a7efe44c91909c1214762c186b8c57ae12a16f3",
    "d307c1e97d427428f1d5859d2be608ff1b2ccc6f"
  ]
}
btsbots (unlocked) >>> blockchain_get_transaction 4a7efe44c91909c1214762c186b8c57ae12a16f3
{
  "trx": {
    "expiration": "20141208T013055",
    "delegate_slate_id": null,
    "operations": [{
        "type": "deposit_op_type",
        "data": {
          "amount": 1000000,
          "condition": {
            "asset_id": 0,
            "delegate_slate_id": 9473675977916939725,
            "type": "withdraw_escrow_type",
            "data": {
              "owner": "BTSX111111111111111111113MQ7LD",
              "start_time": "20240917T192947",
              "duration": 3845107543,
              "original_balance": -4376472804032454471
            }
          }
        }
      },{


with me the problems started when trying to email somebody via the BTS wallet before it is officially supported...  I suggest they must somehow block commands for the client  as long as they are still  on BETA stage ...  at least for the gui...

Sent from my ALCATEL ONE TOUCH 997D

[cn-members]

https://github.com/BitShares/bitshares/pull/1111

another patch from Yunbi exchange developer .

[alt]

the problem is because somebody try a escrow transaction, but still not support by client

Code Select Expand


btsbots (unlocked) >>> blockchain_get_block 1209399
{
  "previous": "006648b96af11d06e3b6c55c8cf295d571148c51",
  "block_num": 1209399,
  "timestamp": "20141208T003100",
  "transaction_digest": "c8cf12fe3180ed901a58a0697a522f1217de72d04529bd255627a4ad6164f0f0",
  "next_secret_hash": "b4864ba1493f38fa226b9d49e404c329a73419ff",
  "previous_secret": "690d2d987911bed1ef2283a683045de12a3cdf2f",
  "delegate_signature": "206be773a62d0005d750a45dfd16a71b1a8bbb5c3b087582603c6b6f4df93acbd3bb55c0e3112e9ce02a99723088e78b8168f79f781212dd47a2a95faa701d0112",
  "user_transaction_ids": [
    "4a7efe44c91909c1214762c186b8c57ae12a16f3",
    "d307c1e97d427428f1d5859d2be608ff1b2ccc6f"
  ]
}
btsbots (unlocked) >>> blockchain_get_transaction 4a7efe44c91909c1214762c186b8c57ae12a16f3
{
  "trx": {
    "expiration": "20141208T013055",
    "delegate_slate_id": null,
    "operations": [{
        "type": "deposit_op_type",
        "data": {
          "amount": 1000000,
          "condition": {
            "asset_id": 0,
            "delegate_slate_id": 9473675977916939725,
            "type": "withdraw_escrow_type",
            "data": {
              "owner": "BTSX111111111111111111113MQ7LD",
              "start_time": "20240917T192947",
              "duration": 3845107543,
              "original_balance": -4376472804032454471
            }
          }
        }
      },{


[alt]

here is the patch for client, delegate don't need to upgrade.

Code Select Expand


diff --git a/libraries/wallet/transaction_ledger.cpp b/libraries/wallet/transaction_ledger.cpp
index 0623a6c..0d6e98a 100644
--- a/libraries/wallet/transaction_ledger.cpp
+++ b/libraries/wallet/transaction_ledger.cpp
@@ -1178,6 +1178,11 @@ bool wallet_impl::scan_deposit( const deposit_operation& op, const vector<privat
           // TODO: FC_THROW( "withdraw_option_type not implemented!" );
           break;
        }
+       case withdraw_escrow_type:
+       {
+          // TODO: FC_THROW( "withdraw_option_type not implemented!" );
+          break;
+       }
        default:
        {
           FC_THROW( "unknown withdraw condition type!" );


[svk]

Same here:

Code Select Expand

Beginning scan at block 1209398...
Scan failure.
Beginning scan at block 1209398...
Scan failure.
Beginning scan at block 1209398...
Scan failure.
Beginning scan at block 1209398...
Scan failure.
Beginning scan at block 1209398...
Scan failure.
Beginning scan at block 1209398...
Scan failure.
Beginning scan at block 1209398...
Scan failure.
Beginning scan at block 1209398...
Scan failure.
Beginning scan at block 1209398...
Scan failure.

[merockstar]

Anyone try to delete mail folder?

yes. works for the segmentation fault im experiencing in a different thread. still getting the scanning error though.

[zerosum]

Anyone try to delete mail folder?

If I would expect somebody to come with the most illogical solution that works, that will be *Dani the Lion* ...so just try it, I say.

[jsidhu]

Anyone try to delete mail folder?

[cn-members]

last month I had to  export all my private keys , exit the wallet , rename the wallet data folder ,  start the wallet , create a new one , import all my private keys (BTSfniksefNRKENFKfFNDKFNKD,this kind of private key ) , then wait for a rescan , solved the problem .

Simple rescan didn't solve it .

[emailtooaj]

Ditto!
I'm having the same "Failure During Transaction Scanning" error.

I've restarted everything to no avail!

[onceuponatime]

Are transactions stopped? Is current situation serious or just a happening?

Is this an emergency?

Are core devs aware of it?

[clayop]

Are transactions stopped? Is current situation serious or just a happening?

[jsidhu]

wonder which delegate signed the block.. maybe they tampering with the chain somehow.. dont know the consensus on how blocks are accepted intot he chain... thought its a majority between all 101 delegates? Dunno maybe just a loophole with the pub key address validation.

Nothing was pushed to master so its not the code, either someone signed a bad block on purpose or the validation isn't right.

[jsidhu]

I am getting "Failure during transaction scanning" in my v0.4.24

Tried restarting, same.

Tried rescanning, starts off, but then same.

Uninstalled and then reinstalled, said: "Failure during transaction scanning"

Tried rescanning and watched closely. It rescanned 99% and then "Failure during transaction scanning".

It just happened... check the logs..

[onceuponatime]

I am getting "Failure during transaction scanning" in my v0.4.24

Tried restarting, same.

Tried rescanning, starts off, but then same.

Uninstalled and then reinstalled, said: "Failure during transaction scanning"

Tried rescanning and watched closely. It rescanned 99% and then "Failure during transaction scanning".

[jsidhu]

I think I just had a similar error. Before attempting a transaction and segmentation faulting.

Must have just happened.. Stan had it too.

[merockstar]

I think I just had a similar error. Before attempting a transaction and segmentation faulting.

[jsidhu]

KEY9EZUvQjARsbqxC☻DQ261f6irmi1MxJj89 was found as a key and thus crashed my client... Stan also had scan failure just like me... I restarted my client and saw this assertion where the key was invalid.


How does a key like that get created? looks like a raw address... hacker?