100% Delegates Proposal: BTSNow Developers

Started by dannotestein, January 05, 2015, 10:04:59 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

dannotestein

Quote from: testz on January 13, 2015, 06:07:15 AM
Voted. Thanks for your work  +5%

Quote from: dannotestein on January 05, 2015, 10:04:59 PM
We've been operating a private jenkins build server that builds Linux, Mac, and Windows versions of the software...

Do you have GUI Linux version? If yes, can you start posting Linux release versions to Github?
Trusted pre-compiled version will help Linux users a lot.
Yes, we'll be releasing GUI Linux versions as well.
[url="http://blocktrades.us"]http://blocktrades.us[/url] Fast/Safe/High-Liquidity Crypto Coin Converter

vegolino


testz

Voted. Thanks for your work  +5%

Quote from: dannotestein on January 05, 2015, 10:04:59 PM
We've been operating a private jenkins build server that builds Linux, Mac, and Windows versions of the software...

Do you have GUI Linux version? If yes, can you start posting Linux release versions to Github?
Trusted pre-compiled version will help Linux users a lot.


bytemaster

Quote from: sumantso on January 06, 2015, 11:02:16 AM
Quote from: toast on January 06, 2015, 01:22:27 AM
Quote from: dannotestein on January 05, 2015, 10:04:59 PM
As Bytemaster succinctly put it in today's meeting, we're "the guys that solve hard problems".

Yep! If anyone has disproportionally low "rep" in the bitshares community, it's dan and eric.

If I  remember correctly, after your first days with I3 you said that BM and Dan N were on another level.

This is a great example how forcing the employees to become block producers is ungainly. There are now 4 block producers by the same company which was completely unnecessary. With all the paid delegate bids, it also means all the reliable block producers who only stay as such will get eventually moved out.

I would recommend that we use helper delegates.  Reliable block producers could "hire" Dan N and Co. and run their nodes for them.   Once BTS grows then Dan N can run a single delegate.   Lets not draw long term conclusions based upon short term situation.
For the latest updates checkout my blog: [url="http://bytemaster.bitshares.org"]http://bytemaster.bitshares.org[/url]
Anything said on these forums does not constitute an intent to create a legal obligation or contract between myself and anyone else.   These are merely my opinions and I reserve the right to change them at any time.

sumantso

Quote from: Rune on January 06, 2015, 01:32:54 PM
Quote from: sumantso on January 06, 2015, 11:02:16 AM
Quote from: toast on January 06, 2015, 01:22:27 AM
Quote from: dannotestein on January 05, 2015, 10:04:59 PM
As Bytemaster succinctly put it in today's meeting, we're "the guys that solve hard problems".

Yep! If anyone has disproportionally low "rep" in the bitshares community, it's dan and eric.

If I  remember correctly, after your first days with I3 you said that BM and Dan N were on another level.

This is a great example how forcing the employees to become block producers is ungainly. There are now 4 block producers by the same company which was completely unnecessary. With all the paid delegate bids, it also means all the reliable block producers who only stay as such will get eventually moved out.

There's no risk in having a single entity controlling 4 delegates. Even if we only had 10 people controlling 10 delegates each, we'd still be more decentralized than bitcoin. And I don't see anything wrong in pushing out some init delegates :P. Eventually many of the people who are currently block producers can become highly voted standby delegates instead. They can still be compensated for their standby service, ensuring that the moment a delegate stops producing blocks they can get voted out and quickly replaced by an operational block producer.

You're preaching to the wrong guy. Try getting heard over the loud trolls.
The minimum option we give them, the better.

xeroc

adding you to my slate on the next update

Rune

Quote from: sumantso on January 06, 2015, 11:02:16 AM
Quote from: toast on January 06, 2015, 01:22:27 AM
Quote from: dannotestein on January 05, 2015, 10:04:59 PM
As Bytemaster succinctly put it in today's meeting, we're "the guys that solve hard problems".

Yep! If anyone has disproportionally low "rep" in the bitshares community, it's dan and eric.

If I  remember correctly, after your first days with I3 you said that BM and Dan N were on another level.

This is a great example how forcing the employees to become block producers is ungainly. There are now 4 block producers by the same company which was completely unnecessary. With all the paid delegate bids, it also means all the reliable block producers who only stay as such will get eventually moved out.

There's no risk in having a single entity controlling 4 delegates. Even if we only had 10 people controlling 10 delegates each, we'd still be more decentralized than bitcoin. And I don't see anything wrong in pushing out some init delegates :P. Eventually many of the people who are currently block producers can become highly voted standby delegates instead. They can still be compensated for their standby service, ensuring that the moment a delegate stops producing blocks they can get voted out and quickly replaced by an operational block producer.

sumantso

Quote from: toast on January 06, 2015, 01:22:27 AM
Quote from: dannotestein on January 05, 2015, 10:04:59 PM
As Bytemaster succinctly put it in today's meeting, we're "the guys that solve hard problems".

Yep! If anyone has disproportionally low "rep" in the bitshares community, it's dan and eric.

If I  remember correctly, after your first days with I3 you said that BM and Dan N were on another level.

This is a great example how forcing the employees to become block producers is ungainly. There are now 4 block producers by the same company which was completely unnecessary. With all the paid delegate bids, it also means all the reliable block producers who only stay as such will get eventually moved out.

CLains

Interesting to hear what you all have been doing behind the scenes!  +5%

Now that SynaptiCAD needs a "face" both for the voting majority and for the on/off ramp, I would love to see you collaborating closely with a designer-type as well.
Vote for BitSpace EOS Block Producer!

[url="https://steemit.com/eos/@bitspace/bitspace-eos-block-producer-candidate"]https://steemit.com/eos/@bitspace/bitspace-eos-block-producer-candidate[/url]

BTSdac

I will vote you , also thanks for your team working +5% and I think BTS should been consider as stock not money. because now the price of BTS is a little low ,it is a little difficult  to use BTS to cover salary .
but if the BTS price is up to 1USD, LOL, a delegate can hire ten developing maybe.
[url="//github.com"]github.com[/url] :pureland
BTS2.0 API :[url="ws://139.196.37.179:8091"]ws://139.196.37.179:8091[/url]
BTS2.0 API 数据源ws:[url="//139.196.37.179:8091"]//139.196.37.179:8091[/url]

cass

Will vote for sure! Thx for your outstanding work so far...  +5%
█║▌║║█  - - -  The quieter you become, the more you are able to hear  - - -  █║▌║║█

roadscape

http://cryptofresh.com  |  witness: roadscape

toast

Quote from: dannotestein on January 05, 2015, 10:04:59 PM
As Bytemaster succinctly put it in today's meeting, we're "the guys that solve hard problems".

Yep! If anyone has disproportionally low "rep" in the bitshares community, it's dan and eric.
Do not use this post as information for making any important decisions. The only agreements I ever make are informal and non-binding. Take the same precautions as when dealing with a compromised account, scammer, sockpuppet, etc.

onceuponatime

Quote from: lzr1900 on January 06, 2015, 12:14:23 AM
4 100% payrate delegates?

4 programmers (in one entity/company) working full time on bitshares.

lzr1900