Main Menu

Milestone changes

Started by werneo, January 07, 2015, 08:04:05 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

merlin0113

Quote from: clayop on January 17, 2015, 02:09:25 AM
Quote from: merlin0113 on January 17, 2015, 01:17:02 AM
Quote from: Rune on January 17, 2015, 01:01:57 AM
Quote from: merlin0113 on January 17, 2015, 12:43:09 AM
Are you VA devs working on light client in parallel with working on 1.0? If so, that's the big news!

来自我的 M040 上的 Tapatalk

Wait, the Chinese community doesn't know that the light client is coming out soon? Nathan Hourt and others have been working on it full time for months and it's soon done.

Maybe just me! So good what's the ETA? I thought all work indicates here:
https://github.com/BitShares/bitshares/milestones#userconsent#
on which no light wallet included.
https://github.com/BitShares/bitshares/labels/Light%20Wallet

Thanks clayop. Many chinese people know this now, very positve.

clayop

Quote from: merlin0113 on January 17, 2015, 01:17:02 AM
Quote from: Rune on January 17, 2015, 01:01:57 AM
Quote from: merlin0113 on January 17, 2015, 12:43:09 AM
Are you VA devs working on light client in parallel with working on 1.0? If so, that's the big news!

来自我的 M040 上的 Tapatalk

Wait, the Chinese community doesn't know that the light client is coming out soon? Nathan Hourt and others have been working on it full time for months and it's soon done.

Maybe just me! So good what's the ETA? I thought all work indicates here:
https://github.com/BitShares/bitshares/milestones#userconsent#
on which no light wallet included.
https://github.com/BitShares/bitshares/labels/Light%20Wallet
Bitshares Korea - [url="http://www.bitshares.kr"]http://www.bitshares.kr[/url]
Vote for me and see Korean Bitshares community grows
delegate-clayop

merlin0113

#15
Quote from: Rune on January 17, 2015, 01:01:57 AM
Quote from: merlin0113 on January 17, 2015, 12:43:09 AM
Are you VA devs working on light client in parallel with working on 1.0? If so, that's the big news!

来自我的 M040 上的 Tapatalk

Wait, the Chinese community doesn't know that the light client is coming out soon? Nathan Hourt and others have been working on it full time for months and it's soon done.

Maybe just me! So good what's the ETA? I thought all work indicates here:
https://github.com/BitShares/bitshares/milestones#userconsent#
on which no light wallet included.

Rune

Quote from: merlin0113 on January 17, 2015, 12:43:09 AM
Are you VA devs working on light client in parallel with working on 1.0? If so, that's the big news!

来自我的 M040 上的 Tapatalk

Wait, the Chinese community doesn't know that the light client is coming out soon? Nathan Hourt and others have been working on it full time for months and it's soon done.

merlin0113

Are you VA devs working on light client in parallel with working on 1.0? If so, that's the big news!

来自我的 M040 上的 Tapatalk


toast

0.8.0 + light client = 1.0

ha ha..
Do not use this post as information for making any important decisions. The only agreements I ever make are informal and non-binding. Take the same precautions as when dealing with a compromised account, scammer, sockpuppet, etc.

Rune

Can we all come to a consensus that light client release = 1.0?

arhag

Quote from: vikram on January 08, 2015, 04:54:01 PM
Quote from: arhag on January 08, 2015, 02:40:08 AM

  • Ability to also vote with stake in market orders and collateral in short positions.

This is a larger change and not on roadmap for 1.0.

Thanks for the response. But that is disappointing. We have approximately 200 million BTS tied in collateral (that is 8% of BTS stake owned by active members of the community that could be voting for delegates but currently are not able to). I don't know how many more BTS are tied up in market orders. Is there a reason why you guys can't just slap on a "restricted owner" or "voter key" to market orders and short positions and allow for changing the votes of the associated BTS stake the same way separate voting keys will be done in 0.6? Why is it such a significant change that cannot make 1.0?

vikram

Quote from: arhag on January 08, 2015, 02:40:08 AM

  • Separate voting keys from spending keys with support in the GUI client.
  • Cold storage with offline transaction signing with support in the client.

I have voting keys and multisig hardfork targeted for 0.6; can't say when there will be GUI support.

Quote from: arhag on January 08, 2015, 02:40:08 AM

  • Ability to also vote with stake in market orders and collateral in short positions.

This is a larger change and not on roadmap for 1.0.

bubble789

Whats the progress with light client?

arhag

I don't care what you call it, all I want to know is which milestones (with their tentative schedules) will have:

  • Separate voting keys from spending keys with support in the GUI client.
  • Cold storage with offline transaction signing with support in the client.
  • Ability to also vote with stake in market orders and collateral in short positions.

CryptoPrometheus

Well, Looks like things are progressing since this morning.....

https://github.com/BitShares/bitshares/milestones?state=open

0.5 is now at 100% and everything else has been pushed forward 2 weeks
"Power and law are not synonymous. In fact, they are often in opposition and irreconcilable."
- Cicero

ripplexiaoshan

1.0 is a dream which will never be reached. Bitcoin is still at its 0.9 after 6 years.
BTS committee member:jademont

donkeypong

Around here, the Ides of March comes in July or so.  ;)

Island time.

Riverhead

Quote from: toast on January 07, 2015, 08:06:49 PM
The name "1.0" has a lot of significance even if it's arbitrary.

+5%

1.0 is like a dev sign off that everything is working nominally.

toast

#2
I'm in favor of calling one of the earlier versions "1.0" because it is all pretty much arbitrary but people are waiting on 1.0 to take action which could be done as soon as the light client is out.


edit:   To clarify, 1.0 was supposed to mean protocol stable version. We want protocol stability for third-party services and light client stuff. Those don't actually require the stuff in the newly labeled "1.0", I guess services may have to update their client two extra times. The name "1.0" has a lot of significance even if it's arbitrary.
Do not use this post as information for making any important decisions. The only agreements I ever make are informal and non-binding. Take the same precautions as when dealing with a compromised account, scammer, sockpuppet, etc.

werneo

https://github.com/BitShares/bitshares/milestones

Milestones have changed as of today. It looks like the 1.0 release is set back 6 weeks.

Any official comments about the development roadmap?
live bts charts: [url="https://cryptrader.com/charts/poloniex/bts/btc"]https://cryptrader.com/charts/poloniex/bts/btc[/url]

[url="https://twitter.com/werneo"]https://twitter.com/werneo[/url]