Author Topic: 99,003.377 BTS of Trx Fee for a cover operation in Block # 1465854 ?  (Read 2718 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline abit

  • Committee member
  • Hero Member
  • *
  • Posts: 4664
    • View Profile
    • Abit's Hive Blog
  • BitShares: abit
  • GitHub: abitmore
BitShares committee member: abit
BitShares witness: in.abit

Offline role

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 92
    • View Profile

Offline btswildpig

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1424
    • View Profile
It seems the wallet thought that it wouldn't get the collateral back and so it did not try to deposit it. Most likely because the client was out of sync. So all those BTS went into fees.

We're coming up with a solution so that this can't happen again, meanwhile BM is discussing whether we should reimburse that guy out of delegate pay since that's effectively where his funds are right now.

He shorted @ 0.4.24 with fully synced wallet .
He covered @ 0.4.27.2 with fully synced wallet .
这个是私人账号,表达的一切言论均不代表任何团队和任何人。This is my personal account , anything I said with this account will be my opinion alone and has nothing to do with any group.

Offline 2031654

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 47
    • View Profile
wallet_regenerate_keys 80000 这个不行  等一会就自动退出客户端了 我设置的是wallet_regenerate_keys 20000
我都同步过了操作的

这是下空单和成交时间 用的版本是0.4.24

这是我1月8号早上的所有操作 用的版本号是0.4.27.2
我记得早上是这样操作的:“花费15326个BTS买入1410个BITCNY,然后平仓12月9日做空的BITCNY得到45140个抵押的BTS,然后又花费31000个BTS做空229个BITUSD,然后又花费37253个BTS买入551个BITUSD(其中自己做空的229个BITUSD成交),最后直接平仓12月9日做空的BITUSD,至此我抵押的BTS全部没有了”

交易记录上显示全部被当做手续费了 :'( :'( :'( :'( :'(
我不会英语只能用汉语贴到这了

Offline bytemaster

For the latest updates checkout my blog: http://bytemaster.bitshares.org
Anything said on these forums does not constitute an intent to create a legal obligation or contract between myself and anyone else.   These are merely my opinions and I reserve the right to change them at any time.

Offline toast

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4001
    • View Profile
  • BitShares: nikolai
It seems the wallet thought that it wouldn't get the collateral back and so it did not try to deposit it. Most likely because the client was out of sync. So all those BTS went into fees.

We're coming up with a solution so that this can't happen again, meanwhile BM is discussing whether we should reimburse that guy out of delegate pay since that's effectively where his funds are right now.
Do not use this post as information for making any important decisions. The only agreements I ever make are informal and non-binding. Take the same precautions as when dealing with a compromised account, scammer, sockpuppet, etc.

Offline abit

  • Committee member
  • Hero Member
  • *
  • Posts: 4664
    • View Profile
    • Abit's Hive Blog
  • BitShares: abit
  • GitHub: abitmore
Here is a complaint about fund lost caused by covering a short order.
https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=13042.0

Please check this block:
http://bitsharesblocks.com/blocks/block?id=1465854

Looks strange.
Code: [Select]
>>> blockchain_get_block_transactions 1465854
...
      "deposits": [[
          22,{
            "amount": 5504026,
            "asset_id": 22
          }
        ]
      ],
      "withdraws": [[
          0,{
            "amount": 9900337696,
            "asset_id": 0
          }
        ],[
          22,{
            "amount": 5504026,
            "asset_id": 22
          }
        ]
      ],
...
BitShares committee member: abit
BitShares witness: in.abit