Main Menu

Light Wallet Beta Release

Started by modprobe, February 16, 2015, 02:55:52 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.


abit

The windows client has memory leaks somewhere. It uses a bit more RAM after every UI change (when a new page loaded). After keep it running for days, it allocated 320M RAM. After restart I can see it uses about 90M RAM.
BitShares committee member: abit
BitShares witness: in.abit

modprobe

New beta available in OP. Not many changes in this one, but UIA transfers should be fixed. Enjoy!

modprobe

Arhag is correct; the light wallet pays one fee to the network and one fee to the light wallet server. Internally the light wallet combines these fees into one, to be concise, but if you inspect the underlying transaction, you will see the transfer to the light server separately listed out.

abit

Quote from: arhag on March 01, 2015, 06:13:40 AM
Quote from: abit on March 01, 2015, 04:14:45 AM
Quote from: taoljj on March 01, 2015, 01:50:24 AM
Quote from: abit on March 01, 2015, 01:11:08 AM
http://bitsharesblocks.com/blocks/block?id=1903934
I was transferring 1.5 BTS from light wallet (windows beta2) to an TITAN account, the light wallet said the fee is 0.5 BTS, but why the transaction history shows 0.25 BTS of fee instead? The withdrawal of 2 BTS doesn't match total deposit of 1.75 BTS.
0   Withdrawal   BTS   BTSKRrT9jvXAdaebPC32NqAqpMKLMdYDRe9x   2.0000 BTS
1   Deposit   BTS   BTS7v8r44XXpadFq5c1JMhfAFPTf2AvvDPdo   0.2500 BTS
2   Deposit   BTS   BTSL9pFk718xzSHb3YbQx6NZKAXQSH96jvo5   1.5000 BTS

0.25 fee
1.5+0.25+0.25?
I thought the 0.25 bts went to BTS7v8r44XXpadFq5c1JMhfAFPTf2AvvDPdo is the fee.. If it's not the case, Does it mean I donated 0.25 bts to someone indeed?

Every BitShares transaction needs to pay a minimum fee to the network. In this case the fee paid by this transaction to the network is 0.25 BTS. The rest of the balance 1.75 BTS is sent to other addresses. 1.5 BTS is sent to the address you intended to send it to. The other 0.25 BTS is sent to an address Nathan controls (BTS7v8r44XXpadFq5c1JMhfAFPTf2AvvDPdo) as payment for using the light wallet service. The light wallet displayed the total combined fee of 0.5 BTS (0.25 BTS network fee and 0.25 BTS light wallet relay fee) when you were confirming the transaction.
Thanks for replying.
BitShares committee member: abit
BitShares witness: in.abit

arhag

Quote from: abit on March 01, 2015, 04:14:45 AM
Quote from: taoljj on March 01, 2015, 01:50:24 AM
Quote from: abit on March 01, 2015, 01:11:08 AM
http://bitsharesblocks.com/blocks/block?id=1903934
I was transferring 1.5 BTS from light wallet (windows beta2) to an TITAN account, the light wallet said the fee is 0.5 BTS, but why the transaction history shows 0.25 BTS of fee instead? The withdrawal of 2 BTS doesn't match total deposit of 1.75 BTS.
0   Withdrawal   BTS   BTSKRrT9jvXAdaebPC32NqAqpMKLMdYDRe9x   2.0000 BTS
1   Deposit   BTS   BTS7v8r44XXpadFq5c1JMhfAFPTf2AvvDPdo   0.2500 BTS
2   Deposit   BTS   BTSL9pFk718xzSHb3YbQx6NZKAXQSH96jvo5   1.5000 BTS

0.25 fee
1.5+0.25+0.25?
I thought the 0.25 bts went to BTS7v8r44XXpadFq5c1JMhfAFPTf2AvvDPdo is the fee.. If it's not the case, Does it mean I donated 0.25 bts to someone indeed?

Every BitShares transaction needs to pay a minimum fee to the network. In this case the fee paid by this transaction to the network is 0.25 BTS. The rest of the balance 1.75 BTS is sent to other addresses. 1.5 BTS is sent to the address you intended to send it to. The other 0.25 BTS is sent to an address Nathan controls (BTS7v8r44XXpadFq5c1JMhfAFPTf2AvvDPdo) as payment for using the light wallet service. The light wallet displayed the total combined fee of 0.5 BTS (0.25 BTS network fee and 0.25 BTS light wallet relay fee) when you were confirming the transaction.

abit

Quote from: taoljj on March 01, 2015, 01:50:24 AM
Quote from: abit on March 01, 2015, 01:11:08 AM
http://bitsharesblocks.com/blocks/block?id=1903934
I was transferring 1.5 BTS from light wallet (windows beta2) to an TITAN account, the light wallet said the fee is 0.5 BTS, but why the transaction history shows 0.25 BTS of fee instead? The withdrawal of 2 BTS doesn't match total deposit of 1.75 BTS.
0   Withdrawal   BTS   BTSKRrT9jvXAdaebPC32NqAqpMKLMdYDRe9x   2.0000 BTS
1   Deposit   BTS   BTS7v8r44XXpadFq5c1JMhfAFPTf2AvvDPdo   0.2500 BTS
2   Deposit   BTS   BTSL9pFk718xzSHb3YbQx6NZKAXQSH96jvo5   1.5000 BTS

0.25 fee
1.5+0.25+0.25?
I thought the 0.25 bts went to BTS7v8r44XXpadFq5c1JMhfAFPTf2AvvDPdo is the fee.. If it's not the case, Does it mean I donated 0.25 bts to someone indeed?
BitShares committee member: abit
BitShares witness: in.abit

taoljj

Quote from: abit on March 01, 2015, 01:11:08 AM
http://bitsharesblocks.com/blocks/block?id=1903934
I was transferring 1.5 BTS from light wallet (windows beta2) to an TITAN account, the light wallet said the fee is 0.5 BTS, but why the transaction history shows 0.25 BTS of fee instead? The withdrawal of 2 BTS doesn't match total deposit of 1.75 BTS.
0   Withdrawal   BTS   BTSKRrT9jvXAdaebPC32NqAqpMKLMdYDRe9x   2.0000 BTS
1   Deposit   BTS   BTS7v8r44XXpadFq5c1JMhfAFPTf2AvvDPdo   0.2500 BTS
2   Deposit   BTS   BTSL9pFk718xzSHb3YbQx6NZKAXQSH96jvo5   1.5000 BTS

0.25 fee
1.5+0.25+0.25?
BTS      Witness: delegate.taoljj

abit

http://bitsharesblocks.com/blocks/block?id=1903934
I was transferring 1.5 BTS from light wallet (windows beta2) to an TITAN account, the light wallet said the fee is 0.5 BTS, but why the transaction history shows 0.25 BTS of fee instead? The withdrawal of 2 BTS doesn't match total deposit of 1.75 BTS.
BitShares committee member: abit
BitShares witness: in.abit


clayop

Bitshares Korea - [url="http://www.bitshares.kr"]http://www.bitshares.kr[/url]
Vote for me and see Korean Bitshares community grows
delegate-clayop

Troglodactyl

Name suggestion:

BitShares Tendril

cgafeng

Quote from: modprobe on February 26, 2015, 02:38:46 PM
Thanks again, @cgafeng! :) Have you tried just deleting qmlsettingsplugind.dll? It's a debug library (that's what the 'd' at the end of the name means) so if the light wallet isn't using the debug libs, you should be fine without it. That should make Comodo shut up. Haha

OK, i will delete the debug library next time.

Quote from: clayop on February 26, 2015, 05:45:54 PM
@cgafeng can you make an installer version for non-technical people? I really appreciate for your effort :)
I think there are office team working on it. I can do this before that and may take some time.
BTC:1EYwcZ9cYVj6C9LMLafdcjK9wicVMDV376


joele