Main Menu

Light Wallet Beta Release

Started by modprobe, February 16, 2015, 02:55:52 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Print
Go Down Pages 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
User actions

fav

#115
March 09, 2015, 08:41:16 PM
Quote from: modprobe on March 09, 2015, 08:06:03 PM
joe could send bitBTC to another account, which could be a bridge or gateway or another user. He needs to go to their website to set up the exchange and see the exchange rates anyways.

there's no real world value in bitBTC. that's my point. you can't use it like bitcoin
Join us on Hive: [url="https://peakd.com/c/hive-120117/created"]https://peakd.com/c/hive-120117/created[/url]

modprobe

#114
March 09, 2015, 08:06:03 PM
joe could send bitBTC to another account, which could be a bridge or gateway or another user. He needs to go to their website to set up the exchange and see the exchange rates anyways.

fav

#113
March 09, 2015, 07:33:59 PM
Quote from: fluxer555 on March 07, 2015, 02:22:07 PM
The problem is urgency. We need BTC -> BitBTC functionality in the wallet, NOW. We can take a more neutral approach later.

and what would joe do with BitBTC except for staring at them?
Join us on Hive: [url="https://peakd.com/c/hive-120117/created"]https://peakd.com/c/hive-120117/created[/url]

monsterer

#112
March 09, 2015, 05:51:03 PM
Quote from: modprobe on March 06, 2015, 01:07:03 AM
At present, I have no plans on integrating with any particular exchanges or gateways. Sending to and receiving from these services using the light wallet should work as expected, and I do not necessarily want to endorse any particular service over another.

There is a way to achieve both goals:

* Offer a single deposit/withdraw interface
* Integrate a bridge wrapper
* Choose the bridge with the best price for the chosen coin type

This doesn't unfairly advantage any particular bridge and is win/win for everyone :)
My opinions do not represent those of metaexchange unless explicitly stated.
[url="https://metaexchange.info"]https://metaexchange.info[/url] | Bitcoin<->Altcoin exchange | Instant | Safe | Low spreads

matt608

#111
March 09, 2015, 05:30:03 PM Last Edit: March 09, 2015, 05:35:11 PM by matt608
Is there an ETA for when this will work on all major operating systems?

fluxer555

#110
March 07, 2015, 02:22:07 PM
The problem is urgency. We need BTC -> BitBTC functionality in the wallet, NOW. We can take a more neutral approach later.
Bitshares Wallet Recovery Service:
[url="https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php/topic,24436.0.html"]https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php/topic,24436.0.html[/url]

xeroc

#109
March 07, 2015, 12:38:42 PM
Quote from: hpenvy2 on March 06, 2015, 04:47:56 AM
Quote from: modprobe on March 06, 2015, 01:07:03 AM
At present, I have no plans on integrating with any particular exchanges or gateways. Sending to and receiving from these services using the light wallet should work as expected, and I do not necessarily want to endorse any particular service over another.

It's like we're doing whatever we can not to make BitShares relevant. Between the gag order, the 30M Adam bounty and now this now this. Wow. Hopefully someone will step up and create one that will compete.

From NXT:
http://www.reddit.com/r/NXT/comments/2xw2ox/why_is_the_multigateway_not_included_with_nxt_by/

Quote
MultiGateWay is a 3rd party app. The standard Nxt client is "objective" and does not include any 3rd party apps by default.

However, we are working on a plugin system which will make it extremely easy to just add the MGW plugin to the standard client. :)

I think we should do it the same way .. have an "objective" "official" client capable of loading plugins like metaexchange or btxbots .. or even plugins that do arbitrage on your platform .. :)

clout

#108
March 06, 2015, 08:52:14 PM
Quote from: modprobe on March 06, 2015, 01:07:03 AM
At present, I have no plans on integrating with any particular exchanges or gateways. Sending to and receiving from these services using the light wallet should work as expected, and I do not necessarily want to endorse any particular service over another.

Meant to post this on the web wallet thread. Its not as necessary to have this functionality in the light wallet but it would be nice.

hpenvy2

#107
March 06, 2015, 04:47:56 AM
Quote from: modprobe on March 06, 2015, 01:07:03 AM
At present, I have no plans on integrating with any particular exchanges or gateways. Sending to and receiving from these services using the light wallet should work as expected, and I do not necessarily want to endorse any particular service over another.

It's like we're doing whatever we can not to make BitShares relevant. Between the gag order, the 30M Adam bounty and now this now this. Wow. Hopefully someone will step up and create one that will compete.

modprobe

#106
March 06, 2015, 01:07:03 AM
At present, I have no plans on integrating with any particular exchanges or gateways. Sending to and receiving from these services using the light wallet should work as expected, and I do not necessarily want to endorse any particular service over another.

clout

#105
March 05, 2015, 11:40:59 PM
How long will it take to integrate the metaexchange API into the wallet? 

cgafeng

#104
March 04, 2015, 03:10:20 PM
BTC:1EYwcZ9cYVj6C9LMLafdcjK9wicVMDV376

modprobe

#103
March 03, 2015, 03:29:46 PM
@abit: Good to know. I'll look into it, thanks. :)

donkeypong

#102
March 03, 2015, 06:09:51 AM
Don't worry. Most of the time, I'm not serious.
Print
Go Up Pages 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
User actions