Main Menu

memorycoin Hashpermin VS processor

Started by trankil, December 19, 2013, 02:21:07 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

agran

Quote2x Xeon 8 Core E5-2650 2.00 GHz - Ubuntu 12.04 x64 = 10.1 hpm
Please fix:
Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2650 v2 @ 2.60GHz - Ubuntu 12.04 x64 = 10.1 hpm
Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2650 0 @ 2.00GHz - Ubuntu 12.04 x64 = 8.2 hpm
MMC: MEKdGj95hNjuYn8xiw4iz1iQUQGA47UBMB | BTC: 1agran1xQ4Nwiqv1qegBDF6kqZdfESMUG


nomullet

Can't believe how expensive that LGA 1366 hardware has gotten- looks like I could sell my 2 year old computer (i7 950) for more than I paid for it...

Quote from: luckye on December 22, 2013, 11:17:18 PM
Dual Xeon 5670 AES-NI @ 8 Hs/min 32 threads
M9ycAeveS8hhQtok6xgLPMEpGsZxFkcgzT

luckye

Dual Xeon 5670 AES-NI @ 8 Hs/min 32 threads

trankil

MMC : MTxecTRmb6Gs4wu4jsftJSHSuowiV3o6tF

PTS : PZt3qLFhQeber5NFjjv3ith813oF6zBwnU

agran

MMC: MEKdGj95hNjuYn8xiw4iz1iQUQGA47UBMB | BTC: 1agran1xQ4Nwiqv1qegBDF6kqZdfESMUG

Delinquency

#19
They do not. Dual L5639 just have a ton of GHz (24 v-cores).

nomullet

I don't believe these older xeons have the AES instruction set.

Quote from: Djemi on December 21, 2013, 07:13:47 AM
Quote from: Delinquency on December 21, 2013, 04:10:15 AM
Quote from: chida on December 20, 2013, 08:04:35 PM
Quote from: trankil on December 19, 2013, 02:21:07 PM

4x 4770k @ 5ghz  16.0

mainboard?

Eh, that must price inefficient for $ per H/m (fades)


---

Dual Xeon L5639 - "hashespermin" : 6.18893583 with version 85400

I have the same config with 2 x5639 getting only 4.5 h/m now... Where is the trick?
M9ycAeveS8hhQtok6xgLPMEpGsZxFkcgzT

Delinquency

Quote from: Djemi on December 21, 2013, 07:13:47 AM
Quote from: Delinquency on December 21, 2013, 04:10:15 AM
Quote from: chida on December 20, 2013, 08:04:35 PM
Quote from: trankil on December 19, 2013, 02:21:07 PM

4x 4770k @ 5ghz  16.0

mainboard?

Eh, that must price inefficient for $ per H/m (fades)


---

Dual Xeon L5639 - "hashespermin" : 6.18893583 with version 85400

I have the same config with 2 x5639 getting only 4.5 h/m now... Where is the trick?

I have a custom script that prevents 'watch' from abusing resources.
the miner runs as an idle process on linux by default.

trankil

MMC : MTxecTRmb6Gs4wu4jsftJSHSuowiV3o6tF

PTS : PZt3qLFhQeber5NFjjv3ith813oF6zBwnU

Djemi

Quote from: Delinquency on December 21, 2013, 04:10:15 AM
Quote from: chida on December 20, 2013, 08:04:35 PM
Quote from: trankil on December 19, 2013, 02:21:07 PM

4x 4770k @ 5ghz  16.0

mainboard?

Eh, that must price inefficient for $ per H/m (fades)


---

Dual Xeon L5639 - "hashespermin" : 6.18893583 with version 85400

I have the same config with 2 x5639 getting only 4.5 h/m now... Where is the trick?

Delinquency

#14
Quote from: chida on December 20, 2013, 08:04:35 PM
Quote from: trankil on December 19, 2013, 02:21:07 PM

4x 4770k @ 5ghz  16.0

mainboard?

Eh, that must price inefficient for $ per H/m (fades)


---

Dual Xeon L5639 - "hashespermin" : 6.18893583 with version 85400

agran

AMD 8 Core FX-8350 - Windows 8 x64 = 2.95 hpm / Ubuntu 12.04 x64 = 3.3 hpm
2x Xeon 8 Core E5-2650 2.00 GHz - Ubuntu 12.04 x64 = 10.1 hpm
MMC: MEKdGj95hNjuYn8xiw4iz1iQUQGA47UBMB | BTC: 1agran1xQ4Nwiqv1qegBDF6kqZdfESMUG

chida

BTC: 12A5tZgivCa7BVF4YbQdtSedFzanpCbupb
MMC: MBayoLj9WEWTsCk8n45G37tDSSJP2Dd9k5
PTS: PiVUjNkwk6VKrKWCMtA7NkqFhfkqR5pnCS

trankil

MMC : MTxecTRmb6Gs4wu4jsftJSHSuowiV3o6tF

PTS : PZt3qLFhQeber5NFjjv3ith813oF6zBwnU