Author Topic: 58 delegates - New update - INDEXES of Hang Seng, Shenzhen Composite, and Nikke  (Read 27269 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline eagleeye

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 931
    • View Profile
To clarify this .. the assets should have had a precision of at least the precision of the denominated asset .. e.g. shenzen in cny .. nikkei in hkd ...

Nikkei is in Japan, so yen.

Xeroc, how about the size, 0.00001 or ?

Offline xeroc

  • Board Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12922
  • ChainSquad GmbH
    • View Profile
    • ChainSquad GmbH
  • BitShares: xeroc
  • GitHub: xeroc
To clarify this .. the assets should have had a precision of at least the precision of the denominated asset .. e.g. shenzen in cny .. nikkei in yen ...
« Last Edit: June 17, 2015, 05:50:57 pm by xeroc »

Offline eagleeye

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 931
    • View Profile
How much should the division be exactly, 1000th it is right now and priced in CNY or BTS?

If 7400 BTS is 0.01 it should be 0.000001 correct?
« Last Edit: June 17, 2015, 05:31:22 pm by eagleeye »

iHashFury

  • Guest
The world is watching and we need to get this as balanced as possible.

As long as these assets can be traded fairly at a reasonable cost and precision, its a win win for everyone.

0.7 BTS or 0.07 BTS fees would be OK now but should we consider the future?

Offline eagleeye

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 931
    • View Profile
Sure, 1/1000 seems like a reasonable scaling factor - I was leaning more towards pricing in BTS, actually... we could do with some more input on the matter.

Once we are sure which way to go, we need the feed authors to update their scripts for us...

I would like to hear iHashFurys input, we may need to go to 1/10000 or 1/100000

More input is definitely needed

It's fine that we need to get people to update, it's a sunk cost, I'll help with that but it may not be as easy as last time
« Last Edit: June 16, 2015, 07:01:38 pm by eagleeye »

Offline monsterer

Sure, 1/1000 seems like a reasonable scaling factor - I was leaning more towards pricing in BTS, actually... we could do with some more input on the matter.

Once we are sure which way to go, we need the feed authors to update their scripts for us...
My opinions do not represent those of metaexchange unless explicitly stated.
https://metaexchange.info | Bitcoin<->Altcoin exchange | Instant | Safe | Low spreads

Offline eagleeye

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 931
    • View Profile
Ok, so we need everyone to update the script, monsterer?

We need to chose how we will update the script first :)

I feel we just go to 10000th or so 0.00001 or what you were thinking

We already have iHashFury in for some BTS so I don't think we should sacrifice him, we just need to make it go lower.
« Last Edit: June 16, 2015, 06:52:11 pm by eagleeye »

Offline monsterer

Ok, so we need everyone to update the script, monsterer?

We need to chose how we will update the script first :)
My opinions do not represent those of metaexchange unless explicitly stated.
https://metaexchange.info | Bitcoin<->Altcoin exchange | Instant | Safe | Low spreads

Offline eagleeye

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 931
    • View Profile
Ok, so we need everyone to update the script, monsterer?

iHashFury

  • Guest
serious school boy error and the first time Bitshares has actually pissed me off  >:(

All of these INDEXES are untradable and I'm in for quite a few BTS

Code: [Select]
TIMESTAMP           BLOCK     FROM                TO                  AMOUNT                  MEMO                                        BALANCE                 FEE                 ID     
================================================================================================================================================================================================
|2015-06-14T16:18:10 2802474   SHORT-9d1b797e      MARGIN-9d1b797e     14,751.00000 BTS        add collateral                              0.00000 BTS             0.00000 BTS         VIRTUAL |
|                              MARKET              MARGIN-9d1b797e     7,375.50000 BTS         add collateral                              0.00000 BTS                                         |
|                              MARGIN-9d1b797e     MARKET              0.01 NASDAQC            short proceeds @ 0.000001356502887 NASDA... 0.00 NASDAQC                                        |
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|2015-06-14T16:18:10 2802474   ASK-da8f10e1        MARKET              7,375.50000 BTS         fill ask @ 0.000001356502887 NASDAQC / BTS  0.00000 BTS             0.00000 BTS         VIRTUAL |
|                              ASK-da8f10e1        mulla               0.01 NASDAQC            ask proceeds @ 0.000001356502887 NASDAQC... 0.01 NASDAQC                                        |
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 2015-06-14T19:16:30 2803543   mulla               BID-2598e19e        0.01 NASDAQC            buy BTS @ 0.00000125 NASDAQC / BTS          0.00 NASDAQC            0.10000 BTS         ad260c3d
 2015-06-15T10:13:18 2808911   BID-2598e19e        mulla               0.01 NASDAQC            cancel BID-2598e19e                         0.01 NASDAQC            0.01 NASDAQC        fafe4e2f

iHashFury

  • Guest
wallet_uia_update_supply <paying_account> <asset_symbol> <max_supply_with_trailing_decimals>

for a MIA

Offline xeroc

  • Board Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12922
  • ChainSquad GmbH
    • View Profile
    • ChainSquad GmbH
  • BitShares: xeroc
  • GitHub: xeroc
In bts 2 .. we can simple vote for a hard fork to fix this!

I would prefer the quick dirty method as bts 2 could take alot more time than you think!
I know that you can change some attributes for UIA if current supply is zero .. maybe something similar is possible with mia .. though i dont know if there is a "owner" for mias

iHashFury

  • Guest
In bts 2 .. we can simple vote for a hard fork to fix this!

I would prefer the quick dirty method as bts 2 could take alot more time than you think!

Offline xeroc

  • Board Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12922
  • ChainSquad GmbH
    • View Profile
    • ChainSquad GmbH
  • BitShares: xeroc
  • GitHub: xeroc
In bts 2 .. we can simple vote for a hard fork to fix this!

iHashFury

  • Guest
It looks like this is turning out to be a missed opportunity if we cant get a quick consensus.

Everyone seems to be more interested in  bitshares 1 v bitshares 2 threads.