It means BitShares (BTS) and not any other token / ledger.
the only point of 2.0 that is not "fair" in my opinion. The community supporters for long times are shut out of the possible private chains Cryptonomex will create and
this community can have 1 chain. At least you should consider to give the BTS community the right to make as many chains with 100% sharedroping.
If you look carefully this is really the next big cut the community has to take.
1. merger - because the possibilty bytemaster will leave BTS
2. Cryptonomex - restriction to 1 chain, because of what?
and to be clear, i know everyone has the need to get food and money etc., but why are you not considering to give later the BTS community a fair amount of Cryptonomex? Just my opinion, but just take
one look from outside. If you would be out of Cryptonomex, would you consider this proposal good or bad for you?