Good luck with this..
I been attempting for the past week to get a dead delegate voted out but it continues to fester.
As for my positions for minebitshares/bunkermining.. I have expressed time and again that the need for multiples is due to the limiting funding of the current model. The reality is we don't have 101, we have more like maybe 15 if that. Many developers have mulltiple 100% delegates.. and many older 3%ers that have been unresponsive in providing feeds.
My plan for my delegates when we get to 2.0 is to put in a single worker proposal, get that approved, and then wind up all my delegates down to 1 witness + 1 worker. This is detailed in my bid at http://vote.bunkermining.com
Others we have not heard much from maybe because of other things.. be nice to hear where all the others are at.
I manage the following delegates in the 101:
delegate.rgcrypto - 100%
sollywood.sollars-com - 100% -- managed servicewww.minebitshares-com
www2.minebitshares-com - 3%
minebitshares-reloaded - 100%
minebts1.bunkermining-com - 100%
Other delegates that are not in the 101 (though I think should be) that I provided managed services too are:
You will note that among all the 101, I have maintained up to date feeds, and all of these delegates have operated with almost no downtime since we started managing them.
Also note we are the only ones that can survive extreme conditions.. even the atomic kind.
After our BunkerShares campaign we have new upgrades being done to our control panel and network infrastructure that is going to enable us to control servers in over 25 different locations worldwide from the bunker. I have plans to develop load balanced templates for any delegates we might manage so they have the option to have their servers run from a particular location as a primary and perhaps the bunker as a secondary.
I run a nuclear bunker data center.. sooo kinda have a lot of resources to bring to this space.
So there is my contribution to "The Purge"