Deposit / Withdraw of Crypto-Coins via Blocktrades & CCEDK

Started by bytemaster, October 12, 2015, 03:42:55 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

betax

Quote from: xeroc on October 13, 2015, 02:08:14 PM
Guys .. please calm down .. we are talking about an MVP!! I know people are expecting wonders .. but there is alot (and I really mean alot) of development ongoing (not to say the last few weeks have been VERY productive from the webdev team) .. please give them some little time to implement your feature request ..
This is still 2015 and many months to go to release the kraken (phun intended)

And being a web wallet, releases / fixes can be made faster...
[url="https://metaexchange.info"]https://metaexchange.info[/url] | Bitcoin<->Altcoin exchange | Instant | Safe | Low spreads

BunkerChainLabs-DataSecurityNode

Quote from: xeroc on October 13, 2015, 02:08:14 PM
Guys .. please calm down .. we are talking about an MVP!! I know people are expecting wonders .. but there is alot (and I really mean alot) of development ongoing (not to say the last few weeks have been VERY productive from the webdev team) .. please give them some little time to implement your feature request ..
This is still 2015 and many months to go to release the kraken (phun intended)

^^^ This... for those of you who are not programmers.. MVP means Minimum Viable Product.. note the Minimum. :)  It's like getting a car without the leather bucket seats.. it will get you from point A to B. Which is what we really want here.
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
[url="//www.peerplays.com"]www.Peerplays.com[/url] | Decentralized Gaming Built with Graphene - Now with BookiePro and Sweeps!
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

xeroc

Guys .. please calm down .. we are talking about an MVP!! I know people are expecting wonders .. but there is alot (and I really mean alot) of development ongoing (not to say the last few weeks have been VERY productive from the webdev team) .. please give them some little time to implement your feature request ..
This is still 2015 and many months to go to release the kraken (phun intended)

speedy

Nice, but these dialogs are not clear at all. When I "withdraw" Bitcoin it doesnt show the conversion rate from CORE to Bitcoin (from looking at graphene.bitshares.org)

Also depositing Bitcoin gives TRADE.BTC - why should I prefer that over BitBTC? And the dialog should have a risk disclaimer about the TRADE.BTC UIA being vulnerable to couterparty risk.

+5% for Metaexchange integration - competition is good escpecially because Meta seems to give tighter spreads!

monsterer

Quote from: bytemaster on October 12, 2015, 08:17:15 PM
If you have an API for generating a deposit address and can accept withdraws by having the BTC address in the memo then I can probably get you integrated today.

https://metaexchange.info/apiDocs#api/1/submitAddress

Withdrawals would be bitshares asset to native asset? Use the function above to get a destination address + memo; the memo is customised to suit the order, its not a plain BTC address. Any questions please give me a shout and thank you for considering us :)
My opinions do not represent those of metaexchange unless explicitly stated.
[url="https://metaexchange.info"]https://metaexchange.info[/url] | Bitcoin<->Altcoin exchange | Instant | Safe | Low spreads

bytemaster

Quote from: Shentist on October 12, 2015, 07:29:41 PM
Quote from: bytemaster on October 12, 2015, 06:27:23 PM
Quote from: monsterer on October 12, 2015, 05:52:15 PM
Quote from: liondani on October 12, 2015, 05:46:37 PM
Quote from: monsterer on October 12, 2015, 05:42:14 PM
Quote from: bytemaster on October 12, 2015, 03:52:50 PM
We will add support for any exchanges / gateways / bridges that define a React JS component and give us a pull request.

The excuse for not integrating metaexchange into 1.0 was that you didn't want to show favouritism to any one service, so for 2.0 you go and integrate your business partners only?

Nice.

he said: any

Blocktrades and ccedk are built in.

We will be more than happy to add support for your gateway.   Support for Blocktrades was "last second" and CCEDK is using the same backend as Blocktrades so they got it for free.  I just haven't had the time to do custom development to support others yet.

the point is we were delegated to valentine to talk to him. we did a short skype talk in JUNE. We left the conversation that he will look into it and will talk to us if he needs anything from us. So now on launch time we are not integrated and it seems we have to do the work by ourself. Fine, maybe we are not important etc. but this is not a good way to support the only open-source community supported exchange.

If you have an API for generating a deposit address and can accept withdraws by having the BTC address in the memo then I can probably get you integrated today.
For the latest updates checkout my blog: [url="http://bytemaster.bitshares.org"]http://bytemaster.bitshares.org[/url]
Anything said on these forums does not constitute an intent to create a legal obligation or contract between myself and anyone else.   These are merely my opinions and I reserve the right to change them at any time.

clout

Will blocktrade reduce the fee on btc to trade.btc conversion since they can generate income from trading in graphene?

Shentist

Quote from: bytemaster on October 12, 2015, 06:27:23 PM
Quote from: monsterer on October 12, 2015, 05:52:15 PM
Quote from: liondani on October 12, 2015, 05:46:37 PM
Quote from: monsterer on October 12, 2015, 05:42:14 PM
Quote from: bytemaster on October 12, 2015, 03:52:50 PM
We will add support for any exchanges / gateways / bridges that define a React JS component and give us a pull request.

The excuse for not integrating metaexchange into 1.0 was that you didn't want to show favouritism to any one service, so for 2.0 you go and integrate your business partners only?

Nice.

he said: any

Blocktrades and ccedk are built in.

We will be more than happy to add support for your gateway.   Support for Blocktrades was "last second" and CCEDK is using the same backend as Blocktrades so they got it for free.  I just haven't had the time to do custom development to support others yet.

the point is we were delegated to valentine to talk to him. we did a short skype talk in JUNE. We left the conversation that he will look into it and will talk to us if he needs anything from us. So now on launch time we are not integrated and it seems we have to do the work by ourself. Fine, maybe we are not important etc. but this is not a good way to support the only open-source community supported exchange.

santaclause102

Quote from: bytemaster on October 12, 2015, 03:42:55 PM
Here is a screenshot showing the deposit / withdraw interface

https://slack-files.com/T04MJ0W5X-F0CA1QX98-a705cfc235

https://slack-files.com/T04MJ0W5X-F0C9Y3E9L-4d95d638c7
When I bought my first Bitcoin / Altcoin on Cryptsy it took me quite a while to figure out what "generate" has to do with the depositing process because I didnt know anything about Bitcoin. Maybe the Button could be "Deposit / Generate" instead of "Generate" only?

bytemaster

Quote from: monsterer on October 12, 2015, 05:52:15 PM
Quote from: liondani on October 12, 2015, 05:46:37 PM
Quote from: monsterer on October 12, 2015, 05:42:14 PM
Quote from: bytemaster on October 12, 2015, 03:52:50 PM
We will add support for any exchanges / gateways / bridges that define a React JS component and give us a pull request.

The excuse for not integrating metaexchange into 1.0 was that you didn't want to show favouritism to any one service, so for 2.0 you go and integrate your business partners only?

Nice.

he said: any

Blocktrades and ccedk are built in.

We will be more than happy to add support for your gateway.   Support for Blocktrades was "last second" and CCEDK is using the same backend as Blocktrades so they got it for free.  I just haven't had the time to do custom development to support others yet.   
For the latest updates checkout my blog: [url="http://bytemaster.bitshares.org"]http://bytemaster.bitshares.org[/url]
Anything said on these forums does not constitute an intent to create a legal obligation or contract between myself and anyone else.   These are merely my opinions and I reserve the right to change them at any time.

monsterer

Quote from: liondani on October 12, 2015, 06:00:20 PM
Have you asked to be included?
Or do you know what criteria you must met to get included?

Last thing I heard was that we were being integrated.
My opinions do not represent those of metaexchange unless explicitly stated.
[url="https://metaexchange.info"]https://metaexchange.info[/url] | Bitcoin<->Altcoin exchange | Instant | Safe | Low spreads

clayop

Bitshares Korea - [url="http://www.bitshares.kr"]http://www.bitshares.kr[/url]
Vote for me and see Korean Bitshares community grows
delegate-clayop

liondani

Quote from: monsterer on October 12, 2015, 05:52:15 PM
Blocktrades and ccedk are built in.

Have you asked to be included?
Or do you know what criteria you must met to get included?
[url="https://www.steempeak.com/@liondani"]https://www.steempeak.com/@liondani[/url]

monsterer

Quote from: liondani on October 12, 2015, 05:46:37 PM
Quote from: monsterer on October 12, 2015, 05:42:14 PM
Quote from: bytemaster on October 12, 2015, 03:52:50 PM
We will add support for any exchanges / gateways / bridges that define a React JS component and give us a pull request.

The excuse for not integrating metaexchange into 1.0 was that you didn't want to show favouritism to any one service, so for 2.0 you go and integrate your business partners only?

Nice.

he said: any

Blocktrades and ccedk are built in.
My opinions do not represent those of metaexchange unless explicitly stated.
[url="https://metaexchange.info"]https://metaexchange.info[/url] | Bitcoin<->Altcoin exchange | Instant | Safe | Low spreads

liondani

Quote from: monsterer on October 12, 2015, 05:42:14 PM
Quote from: bytemaster on October 12, 2015, 03:52:50 PM
We will add support for any exchanges / gateways / bridges that define a React JS component and give us a pull request.

The excuse for not integrating metaexchange into 1.0 was that you didn't want to show favouritism to any one service, so for 2.0 you go and integrate your business partners only?

Nice.

he said: any
[url="https://www.steempeak.com/@liondani"]https://www.steempeak.com/@liondani[/url]

monsterer

Quote from: bytemaster on October 12, 2015, 03:52:50 PM
We will add support for any exchanges / gateways / bridges that define a React JS component and give us a pull request.

The excuse for not integrating metaexchange into 1.0 was that you didn't want to show favouritism to any one service, so for 2.0 you go and integrate your business partners only?

Nice.
My opinions do not represent those of metaexchange unless explicitly stated.
[url="https://metaexchange.info"]https://metaexchange.info[/url] | Bitcoin<->Altcoin exchange | Instant | Safe | Low spreads

twitter

 +5% +5% nice.

by the way , when will 2.0 build be available?   
witness:


Ben Mason


bytemaster

We will add support for any exchanges / gateways / bridges that define a React JS component and give us a pull request.
For the latest updates checkout my blog: [url="http://bytemaster.bitshares.org"]http://bytemaster.bitshares.org[/url]
Anything said on these forums does not constitute an intent to create a legal obligation or contract between myself and anyone else.   These are merely my opinions and I reserve the right to change them at any time.

xeroc


cube

ID: bitcube
bitcube is a dedicated witness and committe member. Please vote for bitcube.

betax

[url="https://metaexchange.info"]https://metaexchange.info[/url] | Bitcoin<->Altcoin exchange | Instant | Safe | Low spreads

bytemaster

For the latest updates checkout my blog: [url="http://bytemaster.bitshares.org"]http://bytemaster.bitshares.org[/url]
Anything said on these forums does not constitute an intent to create a legal obligation or contract between myself and anyone else.   These are merely my opinions and I reserve the right to change them at any time.