Worker Proposal - Refund Order Creation Fees

[Bhuz]

 

[bytemaster]

Adding the percentage fee and splitting in among the referral program is a Separate proposal. It will probably take a similar amount of time and cost.

This is new code that has to redirect the fee to temporarily be held on the order until the order is at least partially filled, then it is paid.  Currently the fee is paid immediately.

Margin Trading / Lending is a much bigger proposal that is not fully defined / specced / understood at this point in time. It will probably be produced later. Lets keep this discussion focused on the narrow scope of the proposed work.

[oldmine]

Are you going to be publishing a worker proposal for margin trading/lending soon?

[clayop]

Where is the percentage fee? Is it retracted or will be implemented in a separate proposal?

[lil_jay890]

 Is this a new fee type that needs to be coded in, or is it the return to sender code that is new?  I do support the fee characteristic change though.

Can we expect the implementation of the referral program for trading fees to cost as much and take as long?  Both are needed for this to be effective.

[bytemaster]

https://github.com/cryptonomex/graphene/issues/445

We have set up a refined process for worker proposals using github to document them.  This is a micro proposal for a small change to the BitShares network to lower fees in the event an order is not filled.

It is small, self contained, and I believe universally desired.  I have asked Bunkerchain Labs to create the worker so voting can begin. 

The total cost is half of one of the earlier proposals because this proposal does not divided Market Trading fees among the referral program.  We will implement that as a separate / independent worker proposal.