GPU miners comparsion

[reorder]

1gh v1.2 - windows 8 64 bit.  sapphire 7970 ghz edition 3gb, 1040 core 1500 ram clock speed. ~1120 CPM

Just for fun:

cudapts (linux) v2014-01-12 GTX690, stock clock settings, 1780 c/m.

Do you mind to try 1gh miner on this one? That would give a general idea how much OpenCL is inferior to CUDA.

[Aber]

Wow :) but 690 is like 2x680?

[phrozenspite]

1gh v1.2 - windows 8 64 bit.  sapphire 7970 ghz edition 3gb, 1040 core 1500 ram clock speed. ~1120 CPM

Just for fun:

cudapts (linux) v2014-01-12 GTX690, stock clock settings, 1780 c/m.

yeah your core from what i've seen with the nvidia results seems to possibly be faster, i'll be curious to see when someone finally implements openCL in more than a benchmarking tool

[dga]

1gh v1.2 - windows 8 64 bit.  sapphire 7970 ghz edition 3gb, 1040 core 1500 ram clock speed. ~1120 CPM

Just for fun:

cudapts (linux) v2014-01-12 GTX690, stock clock settings, 1780 c/m.

[phrozenspite]

1gh v1.2 - windows 8 64 bit.  sapphire 7970 ghz edition 3gb, 1040 core 1500 ram clock speed. ~1120 CPM

[Aber]

There are few in a wild, so maybe we will make a comparsion of them to use best one?

Results

1gh v1.2 - ubuntu 13.04 - 280x (1100/1500) ~1070 cpm
1gh v1.2 - windows 8 64 bit - 7970 3gb (1040/1500) ~1120 cpm

1gh v1.2 - ubuntu x64 - GTX 570 ~960+ cpm
1gh v1.2 - ubuntu x64 - GTX 560Ti ~660+ cpm

1gh v1.2 - AWS g2.2xlarge ~687cpm

cudapts v2014-01-12 - linux - GTX690 (stock clock settings) ~1780 cpm

PtsGPUz0.2ab.exe - windows 8 64 bit - GTX 570 ~830 cpm