Coyote Miner | PPS Mining Pool

[bytemaster]

In order to cover the cost of variance I have added a 5% fee to this pool.   Once the network stabilizes I will lower it.

[bytemaster]

Inoticed not all my computers using the same address dont have the #of valids and invalids. i have like 7 computers running..is this a bug?

Please be more specific, all computers using the same address should see the cumulative # of valid and # of invalid.

[gabainc]

Inoticed not all my computers using the same address dont have the #of valids and invalids. i have like 7 computers running..is this a bug?

[goldbishop]

version `GLIBC_2.14' not found (required by ./linux_alpha_miner-0.1.0) someone fixed it?

Are you on Debian x64?

yes

from terminal :

sudo editor /etc/apt/sources.list

add this line :

"deb http://ftp.debian.org/debian/ testing main contrib non-free" (no quotes)

run :
sudo apt-get update
sudo apt-get -t testing install libc6-dev



it'll ask you a few questions about restarting processes. go ahead and let it restart them
worked on my debian 7 x64 stable

thanks!

[alexxy]

@bytemaster

seems like your miner didnt like gentoo-hardened

Code Select Expand


./linux_alpha_miner-0.1.0: /usr/lib64/libcrypto.so.1.0.0: no version information available (required by ./linux_alpha_miner-0.1.0)
Throw location unknown (consider using BOOST_THROW_EXCEPTION)
Dynamic exception type: boost::exception_detail::clone_impl<boost::exception_detail::error_info_injector<boost::thread_resource_error> >
std::exception::what: boost::thread_resource_error: Resource temporarily unavailable


[spoonman]

Will the linux build work on centOS 6?

[spoonman]

Question:  is it better to use the same wallet address on all my mining machines or different addresses?  Or it doesn't matter?

Ta

I been creating a different address for each computer, makes it easier to track things.

[arubi]

version `GLIBC_2.14' not found (required by ./linux_alpha_miner-0.1.0) someone fixed it?

Are you on Debian x64?

yes

from terminal :

sudo editor /etc/apt/sources.list

add this line :

"deb http://ftp.debian.org/debian/ testing main contrib non-free" (no quotes)

run :
sudo apt-get update
sudo apt-get -t testing install libc6-dev



it'll ask you a few questions about restarting processes. go ahead and let it restart them
worked on my debian 7 x64 stable

[gabainc]

okso we can mine again or arr you goingto go down again ?

[bytemaster]

According to my wallet I have paid out a total of 586 PTS divided among several hundred people. 

I received a transaction for my own miner on the pool which earned 9PTS... 

When you saw the connection drop and reconnect that was due to me processing payments.   

There was a brief period where the PPS was calculated wrong and I was paying you all 3x what I should have, a full 0.1 PTS per share.   I lost money there, but hey it was my mistake.

This pool is still an experiment, don't mine here unless you are willing to take the risk that my software has bugs that could cause problems.  I will make my best effort to see everyone gets paid even if I lose some, but there is still potential of data corruption that would make it hard for me to know what to pay out.   After all it was written in the middle of the night by a coder strung up on caffeinated beverages.   

Disclaimer aside, it appears to be working well from this end.

your mean miner display balance num is wrong?? is 3x?

No, I mean for a while I was incrementing your balance by .1 per share.  I honored those payments so don't worry about your balance what is displayed on your client is what I have in my database and what will be paid to you.

[goldbishop]

version `GLIBC_2.14' not found (required by ./linux_alpha_miner-0.1.0) someone fixed it?

Are you on Debian x64?

yes

[rambo]

According to my wallet I have paid out a total of 586 PTS divided among several hundred people. 

I received a transaction for my own miner on the pool which earned 9PTS... 

When you saw the connection drop and reconnect that was due to me processing payments.   

There was a brief period where the PPS was calculated wrong and I was paying you all 3x what I should have, a full 0.1 PTS per share.   I lost money there, but hey it was my mistake.

This pool is still an experiment, don't mine here unless you are willing to take the risk that my software has bugs that could cause problems.  I will make my best effort to see everyone gets paid even if I lose some, but there is still potential of data corruption that would make it hard for me to know what to pay out.   After all it was written in the middle of the night by a coder strung up on caffeinated beverages.   

Disclaimer aside, it appears to be working well from this end.

your mean miner display balance num is wrong?? is 3x?

[arubi]

version `GLIBC_2.14' not found (required by ./linux_alpha_miner-0.1.0) someone fixed it?

Are you on Debian x64?

[bytemaster]

I want to confirm that everyone is OK with the PPS price given the share target at 0x03ffff....

I would guess so given the demand :)   This means I either got the price right or am over paying.

[goldbishop]

 version `GLIBC_2.14' not found (required by ./linux_alpha_miner-0.1.0) someone fixed it?