Author [EN] [ZH] [ES] [PT] [IT] [DE] [FR] [NL] [TR] [SR] [AR] [RU] [EN] [ZH] [ES] [PT] [IT] [DE] [FR] [NL] [TR] [SR] [AR] [RU] [EN] [ZH] [ES] [PT] [IT] [DE] [FR] [NL] [TR] [SR] [AR] [RU] Topic: -- Brand Conflict  (Read 492 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline fluxer555

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 745
    • View Profile -- Brand Conflict
« on: January 18, 2014, 04:36:10 AM »

I just stumbled upon this site. Is this something that we should take into consideration if we're switching branding to BEX?

Offline Giga

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 118
  • Futurist & Endless Dreamer
    • View Profile
Re: -- Brand Conflict
« Reply #1 on: January 18, 2014, 06:08:48 AM »
I knew about BEX I think they r owned by the same ppl who made . It might be a brand conflict and cause confusion once they r launched. Maybe change to BTEX? Or BSEX? Though the latter sounds like a porn site Lol

Sent from my Nexus 4 using Tapatalk

Offline toast

Re: -- Brand Conflict
« Reply #2 on: January 18, 2014, 06:31:29 AM »
Personally I want the original final chain to take over the name bts so bts BEX will only be used to clarify things a when discussing bitshares brand of dac
Do not use this post as information for making any important decisions. The only agreements I ever make are informal and non-binding. Take the same precautions as when dealing with a compromised account, scammer, sockpuppet, etc.

Offline bytemaster

Re: -- Brand Conflict
« Reply #3 on: January 18, 2014, 06:54:39 AM »
BitShares BEX has been replaced with BitShares X as far as our branding is concerned.

Individual instantiations of BitShares X may have to avoid conflict.
For the latest updates checkout my blog:
Anything said on these forums does not constitute an intent to create a legal obligation or contract between myself and anyone else.   These are merely my opinions and I reserve the right to change them at any time.