Author Topic: Dividends?  (Read 5765 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline bytemaster

I think OldMan makes a strong case for monthly dividend payouts. “Destroy continuously and split monthly.”   I would like to see this seriously considered as a requirement.

If Bitshares is going to advertise that it pays dividends (as it currently does) then these dividends need to manifest as a concrete inflow value that the user can easily connect to something tangible (IE ooh I can get a free lunch tomorrow). A dividend needs to be a transaction showing a deposit into the user’s wallet.  I think it would be a big mistake to punt on implementing dividend transactions and instead think it is acceptable to solve this in the UI layer and display some calculated value percentage of the whole.   I get it that it burning the fees is cleaner and handles the math, but it will not have the same impact on the user’s value perception.   

Is there an opportunity to incentivize support of the TaPOS here?  Something like: wallets that have made at least 1 transaction in the past month will receive dividend payout. Inactive wallets are penalized by not getting dividend payout.

I think that we can work it like this:

Balance:              1000 MIPs  (Micro Percents) 
Dividend Earned:  .01345  MIPs (since last transaction)
Total Balance:       1000.01345 MIPs

This way users can 'remember' what they use to own.   Then when they make a transaction the display updates to:

Balance:              1000.0135 BTS 
Dividend Earned:  .0  BTS (since last transaction)
Total Balance:      1000.01345

All of this would be purely on the display side of things.   When the user makes the transaction it will simply show 'dividends earned' as a separate line item.  We can then display:  Dividends Year to Date.

For the latest updates checkout my blog: http://bytemaster.bitshares.org
Anything said on these forums does not constitute an intent to create a legal obligation or contract between myself and anyone else.   These are merely my opinions and I reserve the right to change them at any time.

Offline patrickb323

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 40
    • View Profile
I think OldMan makes a strong case for monthly dividend payouts. “Destroy continuously and split monthly.”   I would like to see this seriously considered as a requirement.

If Bitshares is going to advertise that it pays dividends (as it currently does) then these dividends need to manifest as a concrete inflow value that the user can easily connect to something tangible (IE ooh I can get a free lunch tomorrow). A dividend needs to be a transaction showing a deposit into the user’s wallet.  I think it would be a big mistake to punt on implementing dividend transactions and instead think it is acceptable to solve this in the UI layer and display some calculated value percentage of the whole.   I get it that it burning the fees is cleaner and handles the math, but it will not have the same impact on the user’s value perception.   

Is there an opportunity to incentivize support of the TaPOS here?  Something like: wallets that have made at least 1 transaction in the past month will receive dividend payout. Inactive wallets are penalized by not getting dividend payout.   

Offline bytemaster

My suggestion would be to show in the wallet, perhaps on an 'Economy' tab:

Balance: 4000 BTS
Percentage of Total: 0.1%
Dividend Yield: 5%

Dividend yield would be the percentage of coins destroyed in the last year.  A graph could also show total supply decreasing as well as yield.

What would be the purpose of displaying the 4000 number? Since the fraction of the money supply is all that matters, the absolute size of your stake in the total supply is unnecessary and misleading.

Instead, the above balance should merely read 100m% (or some other unit that describes fractional quantities), and people are happy because if they just sit on their money, every day they'll own more m% than they did the day before. Done. The only people who ever need to know about the absolute quantities are the programmers.
For transactions, it would be better to show a purchase of 4000 BTS than 0.1%, which actually changes with each transaction due to the destructing fee.

The change in purchasing power for a single transaction is very very small. I don't recall what the fees are, but even if the fee is as high as 1%, you'd have to transact the entire money supply for the purchasing power to change by 1% in a single transaction. The few people who are moving very large amounts of money around are the only ones who will ever notice.

It isn't a matter of the amount of money transacted, but the volume of transactions.  Fees are charged on a per-byte basis.  The total bandwidth is limited by design to maintain low barriers to entry.  This means that price will rise to what the market will bear for transaction fee per byte.   

For the latest updates checkout my blog: http://bytemaster.bitshares.org
Anything said on these forums does not constitute an intent to create a legal obligation or contract between myself and anyone else.   These are merely my opinions and I reserve the right to change them at any time.

Offline oldman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 556
    • View Profile
How about this: once per day the total supply is increased back to 4,000,000 BTS.  OldMan with his 4000 BTS would wake up the next morning to see 4000.5 BTS because 500 coins had been destroyed the previous day, and the block chain updated everyone's wallet balances without actual transactions.

This, except reset monthly instead of daily.

Current practice is monthly distributions and sticking close to what investors are familiar with will help adoption.

Offline biophil

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 880
  • Professor of Computer Science
    • View Profile
    • My Academic Website
  • BitShares: biophil
My suggestion would be to show in the wallet, perhaps on an 'Economy' tab:

Balance: 4000 BTS
Percentage of Total: 0.1%
Dividend Yield: 5%

Dividend yield would be the percentage of coins destroyed in the last year.  A graph could also show total supply decreasing as well as yield.

What would be the purpose of displaying the 4000 number? Since the fraction of the money supply is all that matters, the absolute size of your stake in the total supply is unnecessary and misleading.

Instead, the above balance should merely read 100m% (or some other unit that describes fractional quantities), and people are happy because if they just sit on their money, every day they'll own more m% than they did the day before. Done. The only people who ever need to know about the absolute quantities are the programmers.
For transactions, it would be better to show a purchase of 4000 BTS than 0.1%, which actually changes with each transaction due to the destructing fee.

The change in purchasing power for a single transaction is very very small. I don't recall what the fees are, but even if the fee is as high as 1%, you'd have to transact the entire money supply for the purchasing power to change by 1% in a single transaction. The few people who are moving very large amounts of money around are the only ones who will ever notice.
Support our research efforts to improve BitAsset price-pegging! Vote for worker 1.14.204 "201907-uccs-research-project."

Offline CryptoVape

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 14
    • View Profile
How about this: once per day the total supply is increased back to 4,000,000 BTS.  OldMan with his 4000 BTS would wake up the next morning to see 4000.5 BTS because 500 coins had been destroyed the previous day, and the block chain updated everyone's wallet balances without actual transactions.


PTS: PuTuywkbbsBKPkZ9gaLobjH7PoPb2xUoHQ

Offline CryptoVape

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 14
    • View Profile
My suggestion would be to show in the wallet, perhaps on an 'Economy' tab:

Balance: 4000 BTS
Percentage of Total: 0.1%
Dividend Yield: 5%

Dividend yield would be the percentage of coins destroyed in the last year.  A graph could also show total supply decreasing as well as yield.

What would be the purpose of displaying the 4000 number? Since the fraction of the money supply is all that matters, the absolute size of your stake in the total supply is unnecessary and misleading.

Instead, the above balance should merely read 100m% (or some other unit that describes fractional quantities), and people are happy because if they just sit on their money, every day they'll own more m% than they did the day before. Done. The only people who ever need to know about the absolute quantities are the programmers.
For transactions, it would be better to show a purchase of 4000 BTS than 0.1%, which actually changes with each transaction due to the destructing fee.
« Last Edit: March 26, 2014, 03:26:27 pm by CryptoVape »
PTS: PuTuywkbbsBKPkZ9gaLobjH7PoPb2xUoHQ

Offline biophil

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 880
  • Professor of Computer Science
    • View Profile
    • My Academic Website
  • BitShares: biophil
My suggestion would be to show in the wallet, perhaps on an 'Economy' tab:

Balance: 4000 BTS
Percentage of Total: 0.1%
Dividend Yield: 5%

Dividend yield would be the percentage of coins destroyed in the last year.  A graph could also show total supply decreasing as well as yield.

What would be the purpose of displaying the 4000 number? Since the fraction of the money supply is all that matters, the absolute size of your stake in the total supply is unnecessary and misleading.

Instead, the above balance should merely read 100m% (or some other unit that describes fractional quantities), and people are happy because if they just sit on their money, every day they'll own more m% than they did the day before. Done. The only people who ever need to know about the absolute quantities are the programmers.
Support our research efforts to improve BitAsset price-pegging! Vote for worker 1.14.204 "201907-uccs-research-project."

Offline CryptoVape

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 14
    • View Profile
My suggestion would be to show in the wallet, perhaps on an 'Economy' tab:

Balance: 4000 BTS
Percentage of Total: 0.1%
Dividend Yield: 5%

Dividend yield would be the percentage of coins destroyed in the last year.  A graph could also show total supply decreasing as well as yield.
PTS: PuTuywkbbsBKPkZ9gaLobjH7PoPb2xUoHQ

Offline Troglodactyl

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 960
    • View Profile
My understanding is that since the unit of measurement for these shares is percentage based, the dividends by destruction will be noticeable by increasing wallet balance.  This is not just monthly, but each block.  The only time a split would be necessary would be when granularity of the underlying technical units became a problem, which may not be for quite a number of years.  Still, it's worth considering building in a solution.

Offline oldman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 556
    • View Profile
As Bitshares are destroyed and the total trends to zero there will need to be a reset/split at some point.

Splitting on a monthly basis would mirror the monthly dividend payouts most investors are familiar with.

The psychological value of consistent monthly 'payouts' is enormous - both individual and institutional investors place great value on payment consistency ie. dividend aristocrats and are willing to pay a premium for equities with long histories of uninterrupted payouts.

An increasing percentage is mathematically elegant but does not provide investors with tangible 'spendable' income, ie. fungible value. This is what most investors expect when dividends are marketed.

Honestly, if Invictus markets a '5% dividend' and investors show up to find a percentage 'tracker' there will be a sense of being duped. It's human nature.

I agree with dividends-by-destruction 100%, however, I think there is an opportunity to have the cake and eat it too.

Destroy continuously and split monthly. Best of both worlds.

Offline Troglodactyl

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 960
    • View Profile
If a stock split feature is necessary, I would suggest allowing a snapshot style checkpoint block with all balances bit shifted by 1 to double, any time the total supply has shrunk to less than half the initial supply.

Offline mint chocolate chip

A stock split feature could possibly prove useful for other DACs.
What is the mechanism for a stock split to be used if it was available?

Offline amencon

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 227
    • View Profile
If you split the stock all the time, you will totally remove the point of having a dividend at all, and it could affect the psychology of the market and the share price.


You probably shouldn't have any plan to split it at all, and only do it like 5 years from now when everyone is crying about it.

I could be wrong but I don't think they are planning any stock splits, just that there will be something displayed that indicates your balance in relation to all existing units.

That way even if your actual balance stays the same, this percentage indicator will go up as BTS is destroyed.

A "stock split" would make your balance show a higher number in the same way.

I haven't looked heavily into it, but I'd assume that handling destructive transaction "fees" based on percentages would mean you never get to 0 BTS since as more is destroyed the actual amount destroyed for the next transaction would be less but still the same percentage of the whole.

Edit: Oops, BM beat me to it.

Offline bytemaster

If you split the stock all the time, you will totally remove the point of having a dividend at all, and it could affect the psychology of the market and the share price.


You probably shouldn't have any plan to split it at all, and only do it like 5 years from now when everyone is crying about it.

No plan to split the stock, but it *could* be done if necessary.
For the latest updates checkout my blog: http://bytemaster.bitshares.org
Anything said on these forums does not constitute an intent to create a legal obligation or contract between myself and anyone else.   These are merely my opinions and I reserve the right to change them at any time.