引用自bitcointalk

[coolspeed]

中文版打stan冒泡之后，连沈波也出动了......

相信中文版的信息Bo Shen一直在关注 :D

沈老师经常在中文版块发帖啊。

[jackie]

社区活跃起来了，真好

[lib]

中文版打stan冒泡之后，连沈波也出动了......

相信中文版的信息Bo Shen一直在关注 :D

[bulabu]

中文版打stan冒泡之后，连沈波也出动了......

[ripplexiaoshan]

大家请不要误会。

1》 我是 Bo Shen.  Bitcointalk.org里的boshen1011, 也是charles 文中提到的Bo.
2》 李笑来， charles， dan， stan 和我， 是很好的朋友。
3》 就Ethereum 和 Bitshares （3i） 的关系也非常紧密。

任何优秀的公司都是有优秀的对手作伴的，支持竞争对手~

[Amazon]

李笑来在bitcointalk的ID是 lixiaolai, VIP member。这个帖子里没有出现。所以我要改下标题了，有问题pm我

[codinat]

Bo Shen 先生你好，能告诉大家这次迈阿密大会的收获吗?

[boshen1011]

大家请不要误会。

1》 我是 Bo Shen.  Bitcointalk.org里的boshen1011, 也是charles 文中提到的Bo.
2》 李笑来， charles， dan， stan 和我， 是很好的朋友。
3》 就Ethereum 和 Bitshares （3i） 的关系也非常紧密。

[alt]

哈哈，sfinder闹了个大笑话

你理解错了...Dan说的是查尔斯，前CEO，就是在贴子里跟他吵架的这个ID。关于李笑来，两个人都是说好话的(其实是借此讥讽对方不诚实正直。。)。不过这个帖子挺有趣的，仇好深呐。。

[yidaidaxia]

你理解错了...Dan说的是查尔斯，前CEO，就是在贴子里跟他吵架的这个ID。关于李笑来，两个人都是说好话的(其实是借此讥讽对方不诚实正直。。)。不过这个帖子挺有趣的，仇好深呐。。

[sfinder]

你看链接上的其它post，dan说老李是骗子还喜欢指手划脚。不过我相信老李可能在国内被捧，老外不尿他的想法，然后老李就有脾气。不过老李是个英语老师而已，技术问题的确不该插手太多，术业有专攻嘛

[lib]

怎么看出来老李被扁的  ;D

[sfinder]

李笑来原来被Dan给扁了呀？老李给Dan一个右钩拳。<lol> 自己用谷歌翻译看他们吵架的片段

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=325425.80
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=325425.80

Great! Now I have your words on both sides.

No, I started project Invictus back in June of 2013 prior to any investments or people as a call to arms to resolve the fiat to Crypto problem:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=229315.msg2423000#msg2423000

This is Invictus the movement and it is divorced from people and global in scope. My belief is that BitShares and DomainShares as independent blockchains are unnecessary once Ethereum is released and they can simply be deployed upon the Ethereum blockchain. This is why I say they are unnecessary in their current form. I don't look at things Bo as sum zero with winners or losers rather rising tides of what is good for the movement in general.

It makes no sense to me to see all the innovation done by mutually exclusive blockchains each competing for resources and attention. Rather build a single, beautiful and powerful foundation that is sufficiently abstract and modular to accommodate all innovation. Whatever social contracts you want to establish on top is the business of particulars and not of the protocol. This really works well for assurance launched proof of stake style subcurrencies like BitShares for example. This also works well for colored coins as the color kernels can be arbitrary and don't compete.

I really have no problem with the ecosystem Invictus has attracted and the people in it. I do have a problem with your CEO attacking my veracity, ignoring the innovations I brought to the company including the very idea of protoshares (IPOCoin) and the manner in which I was totally divested without any debate or a proper board resolution. These are not issues for the community to be involved in nor productive to rehash.