Main Menu

Naming of XT

Started by xeroc, June 20, 2014, 05:28:49 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Print
Go Down Pages1
User actions

xeroc

#9
June 20, 2014, 08:41:46 PM
So .. we shouldn't call it TEST! Once the real thing is out!

tonyk

#8
June 20, 2014, 07:16:56 PM
Quote from: xeroc on June 20, 2014, 07:07:13 PM
i dont get it .. arent we snapshotting all genesis block of the bitshares X series from XT? any sources I can reread about the purpose of XT?
Yes as of the day of the snapshot for Bitshares X... not as 02/28/2014
Lack of arbitrage is the problem, isn't it. And this 'should' solves it.

tonyk

#7
June 20, 2014, 07:09:59 PM
Quote from: tonyk on June 20, 2014, 06:36:06 PM
Quote from: toast on June 20, 2014, 06:18:31 PM
Quote from: tonyk on June 20, 2014, 05:36:55 PM
But it is worth nothing...other than testnet and late buyers' chance... It is not a DAC it is a alt coin/test coin...

Also the proto-DAC for BTS X. It's original, intended purpose was as a liquid snapshot to appease all the donors.

Only an average/below average size donor, but count me appalled by it.

After doing this last sin - quoting myself...

... what the hell, instead of complaining, I will just double down and  load up on cheap BTS XT when it comes out.

Lack of arbitrage is the problem, isn't it. And this 'should' solves it.

xeroc

#6
June 20, 2014, 07:07:13 PM
Quote from: gamey on June 20, 2014, 06:32:30 PM

Calling it  BTS eXchange Target was my idea but honestly that is what I guessed it meant.  So in that regard it wasn't a suggestion but a mistake.

The reason I post this is not to pat myself on the back, but to point out the level of confusion in all this stuff.
i dont get it .. arent we snapshotting all genesis block of the bitshares X series from XT? any sources I can reread about the purpose of XT?

tonyk

#5
June 20, 2014, 06:36:06 PM
Quote from: toast on June 20, 2014, 06:18:31 PM
Quote from: tonyk on June 20, 2014, 05:36:55 PM
But it is worth nothing...other than testnet and late buyers' chance... It is not a DAC it is a alt coin/test coin...

Also the proto-DAC for BTS X. It's original, intended purpose was as a liquid snapshot to appease all the donors.

Only an average/below average size donor, but count me appalled by it.
Lack of arbitrage is the problem, isn't it. And this 'should' solves it.

gamey

#4
June 20, 2014, 06:32:30 PM

Calling it  BTS eXchange Target was my idea but honestly that is what I guessed it meant.  So in that regard it wasn't a suggestion but a mistake.

The reason I post this is not to pat myself on the back, but to point out the level of confusion in all this stuff.
I speak for myself and only myself.

toast

#3
June 20, 2014, 06:18:31 PM
Quote from: tonyk on June 20, 2014, 05:36:55 PM
But it is worth nothing...other than testnet and late buyers' chance... It is not a DAC it is a alt coin/test coin...

Also the proto-DAC for BTS X. It's original, intended purpose was as a liquid snapshot to appease all the donors.
Do not use this post as information for making any important decisions. The only agreements I ever make are informal and non-binding. Take the same precautions as when dealing with a compromised account, scammer, sockpuppet, etc.

tonyk

#2
June 20, 2014, 05:36:55 PM Last Edit: June 20, 2014, 05:39:39 PM by tonyk
But it is worth nothing...other than testnet and late buyers' chance... It is not a DAC it is a alt coin/test coin...
Lack of arbitrage is the problem, isn't it. And this 'should' solves it.

xeroc

#1
June 20, 2014, 05:28:49 PM
Can we find consensus about NOT calling BitShares XT the _test_ of bitshares x buz maybe (as I read somewhere else)
BitShares eXchange Target

Calling it Testing too much implies a testnetwork worth nothing!

Discuss!
Print
Go Up Pages1
User actions