2 questions Stan,
1. Do you plan AGS 2.0?
2. My understanding is that AGS will never be made liquid, mainly for legal reasons not for lack of desire to do so.
Is there any recent development that this might change? (as in loopholes, working towards change the laws… etc.)
We have no plans for AGS 2.0. We have suggested that individual DACs might distribute some of their remaining 80% using a similar proof-of-donation approach, but that is up to individual developer/operators, not us.
We see the most potential in having Delegate controlled smart spigots fund future development. This puts these fund allocation decisions in the hands of elected leaders, not us.
There were several reasons for not making AGS liquid - regulatory constraints is one. Not changing the rules is another. To me, the biggest consideration the fact that AGS targets sharedrops to people proven to donate to developers
. If liquid, they would be no different from PTS and then you would have to argue why one demographic mailing list should get 20% of the shares. A harder sell, IMHO, than 10% to two different demographics.