Dry Run 9: [Block]Chain Hang Low (featuring guest performer: ~~BitUSD~~)

Started by toast, July 15, 2014, 04:11:56 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

bytemaster

For the latest updates checkout my blog: [url="http://bytemaster.bitshares.org"]http://bytemaster.bitshares.org[/url]
Anything said on these forums does not constitute an intent to create a legal obligation or contract between myself and anyone else.   These are merely my opinions and I reserve the right to change them at any time.

bytemaster

Quote from: spartako on July 15, 2014, 09:27:17 PM
Tried to import my private key but I have this error:


default (unlocked) >>> wallet_account_create spartako
default (unlocked) >>>wallet_import_private_key 5...BTC..PRIVATE...KEY.... spartako
10 assert_exception: Assert Exception
oacct.valid(): just imported a key but now the key has no owner
    {}
    th_a  client.cpp:1733 wallet_import_private_key

    {}
    th_a  common_api_client.cpp:563 wallet_import_private_key

    {"command":"wallet_import_private_key"}
    th_a  cli.cpp:538 execute_command


EDIT: even if there is this error after wallet_rescan_blockchain command the balance is CORRECT
Known issue, Toast is on it.
For the latest updates checkout my blog: [url="http://bytemaster.bitshares.org"]http://bytemaster.bitshares.org[/url]
Anything said on these forums does not constitute an intent to create a legal obligation or contract between myself and anyone else.   These are merely my opinions and I reserve the right to change them at any time.

Fox

I had to up my RAM allocation to compile this Dry Run version. 

Off we go:
wallet_approve_delegate fox
Witness: fox

spartako

Tried to import my private key but I have this error:


default (unlocked) >>> wallet_account_create spartako
default (unlocked) >>>wallet_import_private_key 5...BTC..PRIVATE...KEY.... spartako
10 assert_exception: Assert Exception
oacct.valid(): just imported a key but now the key has no owner
    {}
    th_a  client.cpp:1733 wallet_import_private_key

    {}
    th_a  common_api_client.cpp:563 wallet_import_private_key

    {"command":"wallet_import_private_key"}
    th_a  cli.cpp:538 execute_command


EDIT: even if there is this error after wallet_rescan_blockchain command the balance is CORRECT
wallet_account_set_approval spartako

liondani

Quote from: jbutta2k13 on July 15, 2014, 08:31:16 PM
Loading blockchain from "/var/bts/chain"
Loading config "/var/bts/config.json"
------------ error --------------
10001 db_in_use_exception: Database in Use
Unable to open database /var/bts/peers.leveldb
        IO error: lock /var/bts/peers.leveldb/LOCK: Resource temporarily unavail
able
    {"db":"/var/bts/peers.leveldb","msg":"IO error: lock /var/bts/peers.leveldb/
LOCK: Resource temporarily unavailable"}
    p2p  level_pod_map.hpp:45 open
zsh: segmentation fault  /var/bts/bitshares_toolkit/programs/client/bitshares_cl
ient --data-dir   6553

also ports are not releasing and full reboot is required.

had same issue
and was fixed after a hard reset...

On this Dry Run and Dry Run 6 if I can remember well (linux Mint 17 64bit)
[url="https://www.steempeak.com/@liondani"]https://www.steempeak.com/@liondani[/url]

toast

Do not use this post as information for making any important decisions. The only agreements I ever make are informal and non-binding. Take the same precautions as when dealing with a compromised account, scammer, sockpuppet, etc.

liondani

[url="https://www.steempeak.com/@liondani"]https://www.steempeak.com/@liondani[/url]

liondani

Quote from: Simeon II on July 15, 2014, 08:09:56 PM

Is this thread gonna be about expensive play dough?

On another note, I said that 'I will not try to be a delegate' (post is dilated now due to semi-smooth start to this run).
So I made the right decision and end up saving a lot of fake money! Should I jump with joy?

It is obvious not a problem with Dry Runs and fake money, we are only discussing it now so maybe we prevent problems on the original chain run...
I guess on the real chain everything will be smoother due to real coin value...
[url="https://www.steempeak.com/@liondani"]https://www.steempeak.com/@liondani[/url]

jbutta2k13

Loading blockchain from "/var/bts/chain"
Loading config "/var/bts/config.json"
------------ error --------------
10001 db_in_use_exception: Database in Use
Unable to open database /var/bts/peers.leveldb
        IO error: lock /var/bts/peers.leveldb/LOCK: Resource temporarily unavail
able
    {"db":"/var/bts/peers.leveldb","msg":"IO error: lock /var/bts/peers.leveldb/
LOCK: Resource temporarily unavailable"}
    p2p  level_pod_map.hpp:45 open
zsh: segmentation fault  /var/bts/bitshares_toolkit/programs/client/bitshares_cl
ient --data-dir   6553

also ports are not releasing and full reboot is required.


bytemaster

By popular demand, the delegate fee calculation is clearly way more volatile than I intended so we are going to reset this dryrun before we get too far into it.

New calculations:


delegate_pay = total_accumulated_fees / (blocks_per_day*14)
delegate_registration = delegate_pay * blocks_per_hour * 2 / 101


The effect of this change is that delegate pay will rise much slower, and registration will have a much smaller impact on delegate pay.  (14 days vs 2 hours). 
For the latest updates checkout my blog: [url="http://bytemaster.bitshares.org"]http://bytemaster.bitshares.org[/url]
Anything said on these forums does not constitute an intent to create a legal obligation or contract between myself and anyone else.   These are merely my opinions and I reserve the right to change them at any time.

dxtr

I can not cover a short position (I think I'm doing it right way, and have sufficient funds...):

dxtr-wallet (unlocked) >>> blockchain_market_list_shorts USD
TYPE        QUANTITY            PRICE                         BALANCE             COST                COLLATERAL          ID                                 
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
short_order 111.11111 XTS       0.9 USD / XTS                 111.11111 XTS       99.9999 USD         N/A                 XTS7H8Bnrk5iFHP9rXcj6Kj5VJPRbd6aWJPz
dxtr-wallet (unlocked) >>>  wallet_market_cover dxtr 10 USD XTS7H8Bnrk5iFHP9rXcj6Kj5VJPRbd6aWJPz
10 assert_exception: Assert Exception
order_to_cover.valid():
    {}
    th_a  wallet.cpp:3215 cover_short

    {"from_account_name":"dxtr","real_quantity_usd":10,"quote_symbol":"USD","owner_address":"XTS7H8Bnrk5iFHP9rXcj6Kj5VJPRbd6aWJPz","sign":true}
    th_a  wallet.cpp:3288 cover_short

    {}
    th_a  common_api_client.cpp:1299 wallet_market_cover

    {"command":"wallet_market_cover"}
    th_a  cli.cpp:538 execute_command

Help me out:     wallet_approve_delegate mr.scroodge true

Simeon II


Is this thread gonna be about expensive play dough?

On another note, I said that 'I will not try to be a delegate' (post is dilated now due to semi-smooth start to this run).
So I made the right decision and end up saving a lot of fake money! Should I jump with joy?

[url=http://letstalkbitcoin.com?ref=dbb10f76]LTBcoin - The future of mining! Can be mined using Tapatalk![/url]

liondani

Quote from: bytemaster on July 15, 2014, 07:33:28 PM
Quote from: liondani on July 15, 2014, 06:44:25 PM
Quote from: bytemaster on July 15, 2014, 06:38:31 PM
Quote from: bitcoinerS on July 15, 2014, 06:30:04 PM
Something needs to be done about delegate registration fees.

2014-07-15T18:16:37 544       bitcoiners          bitcoiners          0.00000 XTS           856,060.89468 XTS   register bitcoiners as a delegate       92fe4244


The registration fees are doing their job of rate-limiting delegate signup.   They are currently 4 million, and in an hour will be under 60K if no one else signs up and pays the huge price.    In 2 hours it will be under 6000 (assuming few fees are collected during that time).

so that means only the BitSharesX whales will have the oportumity to be the first delegates, and I assume the last ones as well...

Ridiculous.   Even at todays BTSX prices on BTER the current signup fee is only $1800 and falling.   That is hardly whale level.


I think you are wrong. To get a delegate right now it costs 6,312,291 XTS
that means 6,312,291*0.0000203 BTC = 128.1395073 BTC * $620 = $79,446


liondani (unlocked) >>> config
{
  "blockchain_id": "5a50ec8c2433e7d5fce13187be2db73d112dcdc6b3766751fbff6162e90836b0",
  "symbol": "XTS",
  "name": "BitShares XTS",
  "version": 107,
  "genesis_timestamp": "20140715T000000",
  "block_interval": 10,
  "target_block_size": 25600,
  "max_block_size": 51200,
  "max_blockchain_size": 107374182400,
  "address_prefix": "XTS",
  "min_block_fee": 1,
  "inactivity_fee_apr": 10,
  "delegate_num": 101,
  "delegate_reg_fee": "6,312,291.61188 XTS",
  "name_size_max": 63,
  "memo_size_max": 19,
  "data_size_max": 65536,
  "symbol_size_max": 5,
  "symbol_size_min": 3,
  "asset_reg_fee": "637,541,452.80000 XTS",
  "asset_shares_max": 1000000000000000,
  "proposal_vote_message_max": 1024,
  "max_pending_queue_size": 100,
  "max_trx_per_second": 10
}


[url="https://www.steempeak.com/@liondani"]https://www.steempeak.com/@liondani[/url]

bitcoinerS

>>> approve bitcoiners

dxtr

Quote from: bitcoinerS on July 15, 2014, 07:47:43 PM
It seems delegate registration fees are changing quite randomly. It dropped down below 100,000 XTS and now back up to over 10 million..

>> blockchain_get_config

{
  "blockchain_id": "5a50ec8c2433e7d5fce13187be2db73d112dcdc6b3766751fbff6162e90836b0",
  "symbol": "XTS",
  "name": "BitShares XTS",
  "version": 107,
  "genesis_timestamp": "20140715T000000",
  "block_interval": 10,
  "target_block_size": 25600,
  "max_block_size": 51200,
  "max_blockchain_size": 107374182400,
  "address_prefix": "XTS",
  "min_block_fee": 1,
  "inactivity_fee_apr": 10,
  "delegate_num": 101,
  "delegate_reg_fee": "11,444,627.53767 XTS",
  "name_size_max": 63,
  "memo_size_max": 19,
  "data_size_max": 65536,
  "symbol_size_max": 5,
  "symbol_size_min": 3,
  "asset_reg_fee": "1,155,907,381.30560 XTS",
  "asset_shares_max": 1000000000000000,
  "proposal_vote_message_max": 1024,
  "max_pending_queue_size": 100,
  "max_trx_per_second": 10
}
>> blockchain_get_config

{
  "blockchain_id": "5a50ec8c2433e7d5fce13187be2db73d112dcdc6b3766751fbff6162e90836b0",
  "symbol": "XTS",
  "name": "BitShares XTS",
  "version": 107,
  "genesis_timestamp": "20140715T000000",
  "block_interval": 10,
  "target_block_size": 25600,
  "max_block_size": 51200,
  "max_blockchain_size": 107374182400,
  "address_prefix": "XTS",
  "min_block_fee": 1,
  "inactivity_fee_apr": 10,
  "delegate_num": 101,
  "delegate_reg_fee": "116,088.31803 XTS",
  "name_size_max": 63,
  "memo_size_max": 19,
  "data_size_max": 65536,
  "symbol_size_max": 5,
  "symbol_size_min": 3,
  "asset_reg_fee": "11,724,920.12160 XTS",
  "asset_shares_max": 1000000000000000,
  "proposal_vote_message_max": 1024,
  "max_pending_queue_size": 100,
  "max_trx_per_second": 10
}


No it goes with what BM said - the price melts down to amount the next candidate is willing to pay, if he pays - it is automatically increasing total_fees and reseting the clock waiting for next rich candidate for a delegate to participate.

But it goes along with: Rich get richer, poor get poorer...
Help me out:     wallet_approve_delegate mr.scroodge true