Delegates and seed nodes, upgrade your client version to 0.4.1

Started by DACSunlimited, August 15, 2014, 01:49:14 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

xeroc

just upgrating to 0.4.1 .. lets check that out ..
0.4.0 was working fine for me though

HackFisher

Quote from: bdnoble on August 15, 2014, 06:31:20 PM
So..... 0.4.1..... crash fixed?

not confirmed yet, some brave delegates are running in gdb trying to catch it.
Anything said on these forums does not constitute an intent to create a legal obligation or contract between myself and anyone else.   These are merely my opinions and I reserve the right to change them at any time.

bdnoble

:)

vikram


GaltReport


GaltReport

Quote from: vikram on August 15, 2014, 04:51:16 PM
Quote from: emski on August 15, 2014, 07:19:27 AM
I updated and everything seemed to work properly.
As soon as I published price feeds I started missing blocks.
emski (unlocked) >>> info
{
  "blockchain_head_block_num": 227738,
  "blockchain_head_block_age": "5 seconds old",
  "blockchain_head_block_timestamp": "2014-08-15T07:17:00",
  "blockchain_average_delegate_participation": "91.82 %",
  "blockchain_confirmation_requirement": 1,
  "blockchain_accumulated_fees": "153,146.14196 BTSX",
  "blockchain_delegate_pay_rate": "1.26608 BTSX",
  "blockchain_share_supply": "1,999,957,225.95763 BTSX",
  "blockchain_blocks_left_in_round": 17,
  "blockchain_next_round_time": "3 minutes in the future",
  "blockchain_next_round_timestamp": "2014-08-15T07:19:50",
  "blockchain_random_seed": "14bfd263fd0987fa90ce853b16c3461e89f4524e",
  "client_data_dir": "/home/emski/bitsharesnodeTock/bitsharesx/programs/client/dd4.0",
  "network_num_connections": 66,
  "network_num_connections_max": 200,
  "ntp_time": "2014-08-15T07:17:05",
  "ntp_time_error": -0.0043769999999999998,
  "wallet_open": true,
  "wallet_unlocked": true,
  "wallet_unlocked_until": "37 minutes in the future",
  "wallet_unlocked_until_timestamp": "2014-08-15T07:53:41",
  "wallet_scan_progress": "? %",
  "wallet_block_production_enabled": true,
  "wallet_next_block_production_time": "at least 3 minutes in the future",
  "wallet_next_block_production_timestamp": null
}
emski (unlocked) >>> blockchain_list_blocks
HEIGHT  TIMESTAMP           SIGNING DELEGATE                # TXS   SIZE    TOTAL FEES      LATENCY PROCESSING TIME
===================================================================================================================
227738  2014-08-15T07:17:00 dpos.crazybit                   0       166     0.00000 BTSX    0       0.004883
227737  2014-08-15T07:16:50 fox                             0       166     0.00000 BTSX    0       0.000117
MISSED  2014-08-15T07:16:40 lotto-delegate                  N/A     N/A     N/A             N/A     N/A
227736  2014-08-15T07:16:30 init34                          0       166     0.00000 BTSX    0       0.002168


And where is my console.log ?


Output from 3.1 client:
     227736
     6b6301bb71de964c1a8f759f304316a3f6417967                lotto-delegate              2       502 2014-08-15T07:16:40         0      NO                  NO
     71f889b8659ff455185586ebedca7e99a21a59bf                           fox              0       166 2014-08-15T07:16:50         0     YES                 YES
         227744
     704bd508f16573c486e8ba828026f257364cc340               delegate.webber              0       166 2014-08-15T07:18:10         0     YES                  NO
     61d53df45eebe57e9f81632dc27eb845ced89d3e               delegate.webber              0       166 2014-08-15T07:18:10         0     YES                 YES
REASONS FOR INVALID BLOCKS
6b6301bb71de964c1a8f759f304316a3f6417967: 10 assert_exception: Assert Exception
converter_itr != _converters.end():
    {}
    th_a  operations.cpp:62 to_variant

    {}
    th_a  operations.cpp:64 to_variant

    {"trx_num":0}
    th_a  chain_database.cpp:1003 apply_transactions

Quote from: emski on August 15, 2014, 07:24:40 AM
What if the delegate in the round just after me hasn't updated?
When we are required to publish price feeds?
Should we do it for all currencies ?
Quote from: Riverhead on August 15, 2014, 09:09:45 AM
Not sure if this is related to 0.4.0 delegates vs 0.3.1 but I'm see this. Note that I haven't missed a block because of this. I have not published a feed yet.




Peer 104.131.134.181:51145 disconnected us: You offered us a block that we reject as invalid
Peer 106.185.24.234:39314 disconnected us: You offered us a block that we reject as invalid

Quote from: xeroc on August 15, 2014, 09:12:48 AM
hm .. my backup system successfully upgraded and produced blocks .. when switching to the main system with 0.4.0 he missed blocks ... wlthough all seemed fine ..
strange .. looking into ito

//edit: seems I needed to reanble block production

Do not publish price feeds until after hardfork and all clients are upgraded. This is a new operation that is part of the hardfork. All old clients will reject blocks containing publish price feed operation. This is the reason for missed blocks.

Large transaction and block sizes are also part of the hardfork, and could result in missed blocks.

console.log was disabled by default in previous update for security concerns. It can be enabled using --log-commands argument.

Delegates are still free to upgrade but must be aware that there a crashing issue has been identified. Brave delegates can upgrade and run client in a debugger to help us get a stack trace of the crash.
ah, great. 

The Unwittingly Brave


bytemaster

No one should publish feeds until we have a chance to provide some more guidance. 


Quote from: vikram on August 15, 2014, 04:51:16 PM
Quote from: emski on August 15, 2014, 07:19:27 AM
I updated and everything seemed to work properly.
As soon as I published price feeds I started missing blocks.
emski (unlocked) >>> info
{
  "blockchain_head_block_num": 227738,
  "blockchain_head_block_age": "5 seconds old",
  "blockchain_head_block_timestamp": "2014-08-15T07:17:00",
  "blockchain_average_delegate_participation": "91.82 %",
  "blockchain_confirmation_requirement": 1,
  "blockchain_accumulated_fees": "153,146.14196 BTSX",
  "blockchain_delegate_pay_rate": "1.26608 BTSX",
  "blockchain_share_supply": "1,999,957,225.95763 BTSX",
  "blockchain_blocks_left_in_round": 17,
  "blockchain_next_round_time": "3 minutes in the future",
  "blockchain_next_round_timestamp": "2014-08-15T07:19:50",
  "blockchain_random_seed": "14bfd263fd0987fa90ce853b16c3461e89f4524e",
  "client_data_dir": "/home/emski/bitsharesnodeTock/bitsharesx/programs/client/dd4.0",
  "network_num_connections": 66,
  "network_num_connections_max": 200,
  "ntp_time": "2014-08-15T07:17:05",
  "ntp_time_error": -0.0043769999999999998,
  "wallet_open": true,
  "wallet_unlocked": true,
  "wallet_unlocked_until": "37 minutes in the future",
  "wallet_unlocked_until_timestamp": "2014-08-15T07:53:41",
  "wallet_scan_progress": "? %",
  "wallet_block_production_enabled": true,
  "wallet_next_block_production_time": "at least 3 minutes in the future",
  "wallet_next_block_production_timestamp": null
}
emski (unlocked) >>> blockchain_list_blocks
HEIGHT  TIMESTAMP           SIGNING DELEGATE                # TXS   SIZE    TOTAL FEES      LATENCY PROCESSING TIME
===================================================================================================================
227738  2014-08-15T07:17:00 dpos.crazybit                   0       166     0.00000 BTSX    0       0.004883
227737  2014-08-15T07:16:50 fox                             0       166     0.00000 BTSX    0       0.000117
MISSED  2014-08-15T07:16:40 lotto-delegate                  N/A     N/A     N/A             N/A     N/A
227736  2014-08-15T07:16:30 init34                          0       166     0.00000 BTSX    0       0.002168


And where is my console.log ?


Output from 3.1 client:
     227736
     6b6301bb71de964c1a8f759f304316a3f6417967                lotto-delegate              2       502 2014-08-15T07:16:40         0      NO                  NO
     71f889b8659ff455185586ebedca7e99a21a59bf                           fox              0       166 2014-08-15T07:16:50         0     YES                 YES
         227744
     704bd508f16573c486e8ba828026f257364cc340               delegate.webber              0       166 2014-08-15T07:18:10         0     YES                  NO
     61d53df45eebe57e9f81632dc27eb845ced89d3e               delegate.webber              0       166 2014-08-15T07:18:10         0     YES                 YES
REASONS FOR INVALID BLOCKS
6b6301bb71de964c1a8f759f304316a3f6417967: 10 assert_exception: Assert Exception
converter_itr != _converters.end():
    {}
    th_a  operations.cpp:62 to_variant

    {}
    th_a  operations.cpp:64 to_variant

    {"trx_num":0}
    th_a  chain_database.cpp:1003 apply_transactions

Quote from: emski on August 15, 2014, 07:24:40 AM
What if the delegate in the round just after me hasn't updated?
When we are required to publish price feeds?
Should we do it for all currencies ?
Quote from: Riverhead on August 15, 2014, 09:09:45 AM
Not sure if this is related to 0.4.0 delegates vs 0.3.1 but I'm see this. Note that I haven't missed a block because of this. I have not published a feed yet.




Peer 104.131.134.181:51145 disconnected us: You offered us a block that we reject as invalid
Peer 106.185.24.234:39314 disconnected us: You offered us a block that we reject as invalid

Quote from: xeroc on August 15, 2014, 09:12:48 AM
hm .. my backup system successfully upgraded and produced blocks .. when switching to the main system with 0.4.0 he missed blocks ... wlthough all seemed fine ..
strange .. looking into ito

//edit: seems I needed to reanble block production

Do not publish price feeds until after hardfork and all clients are upgraded. This is a new operation that is part of the hardfork. All old clients will reject blocks containing publish price feed operation. This is the reason for missed blocks.

Large transaction and block sizes are also part of the hardfork, and could result in missed blocks.

console.log was disabled by default in previous update for security concerns. It can be enabled using --log-commands argument.

Delegates are still free to upgrade but must be aware that there a crashing issue has been identified. Brave delegates can upgrade and run client in a debugger to help us get a stack trace of the crash.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
For the latest updates checkout my blog: [url="http://bytemaster.bitshares.org"]http://bytemaster.bitshares.org[/url]
Anything said on these forums does not constitute an intent to create a legal obligation or contract between myself and anyone else.   These are merely my opinions and I reserve the right to change them at any time.

vikram

Quote from: emski on August 15, 2014, 07:19:27 AM
I updated and everything seemed to work properly.
As soon as I published price feeds I started missing blocks.
emski (unlocked) >>> info
{
  "blockchain_head_block_num": 227738,
  "blockchain_head_block_age": "5 seconds old",
  "blockchain_head_block_timestamp": "2014-08-15T07:17:00",
  "blockchain_average_delegate_participation": "91.82 %",
  "blockchain_confirmation_requirement": 1,
  "blockchain_accumulated_fees": "153,146.14196 BTSX",
  "blockchain_delegate_pay_rate": "1.26608 BTSX",
  "blockchain_share_supply": "1,999,957,225.95763 BTSX",
  "blockchain_blocks_left_in_round": 17,
  "blockchain_next_round_time": "3 minutes in the future",
  "blockchain_next_round_timestamp": "2014-08-15T07:19:50",
  "blockchain_random_seed": "14bfd263fd0987fa90ce853b16c3461e89f4524e",
  "client_data_dir": "/home/emski/bitsharesnodeTock/bitsharesx/programs/client/dd4.0",
  "network_num_connections": 66,
  "network_num_connections_max": 200,
  "ntp_time": "2014-08-15T07:17:05",
  "ntp_time_error": -0.0043769999999999998,
  "wallet_open": true,
  "wallet_unlocked": true,
  "wallet_unlocked_until": "37 minutes in the future",
  "wallet_unlocked_until_timestamp": "2014-08-15T07:53:41",
  "wallet_scan_progress": "? %",
  "wallet_block_production_enabled": true,
  "wallet_next_block_production_time": "at least 3 minutes in the future",
  "wallet_next_block_production_timestamp": null
}
emski (unlocked) >>> blockchain_list_blocks
HEIGHT  TIMESTAMP           SIGNING DELEGATE                # TXS   SIZE    TOTAL FEES      LATENCY PROCESSING TIME
===================================================================================================================
227738  2014-08-15T07:17:00 dpos.crazybit                   0       166     0.00000 BTSX    0       0.004883
227737  2014-08-15T07:16:50 fox                             0       166     0.00000 BTSX    0       0.000117
MISSED  2014-08-15T07:16:40 lotto-delegate                  N/A     N/A     N/A             N/A     N/A
227736  2014-08-15T07:16:30 init34                          0       166     0.00000 BTSX    0       0.002168


And where is my console.log ?


Output from 3.1 client:
     227736
     6b6301bb71de964c1a8f759f304316a3f6417967                lotto-delegate              2       502 2014-08-15T07:16:40         0      NO                  NO
     71f889b8659ff455185586ebedca7e99a21a59bf                           fox              0       166 2014-08-15T07:16:50         0     YES                 YES
         227744
     704bd508f16573c486e8ba828026f257364cc340               delegate.webber              0       166 2014-08-15T07:18:10         0     YES                  NO
     61d53df45eebe57e9f81632dc27eb845ced89d3e               delegate.webber              0       166 2014-08-15T07:18:10         0     YES                 YES
REASONS FOR INVALID BLOCKS
6b6301bb71de964c1a8f759f304316a3f6417967: 10 assert_exception: Assert Exception
converter_itr != _converters.end():
    {}
    th_a  operations.cpp:62 to_variant

    {}
    th_a  operations.cpp:64 to_variant

    {"trx_num":0}
    th_a  chain_database.cpp:1003 apply_transactions

Quote from: emski on August 15, 2014, 07:24:40 AM
What if the delegate in the round just after me hasn't updated?
When we are required to publish price feeds?
Should we do it for all currencies ?
Quote from: Riverhead on August 15, 2014, 09:09:45 AM
Not sure if this is related to 0.4.0 delegates vs 0.3.1 but I'm see this. Note that I haven't missed a block because of this. I have not published a feed yet.




Peer 104.131.134.181:51145 disconnected us: You offered us a block that we reject as invalid
Peer 106.185.24.234:39314 disconnected us: You offered us a block that we reject as invalid

Quote from: xeroc on August 15, 2014, 09:12:48 AM
hm .. my backup system successfully upgraded and produced blocks .. when switching to the main system with 0.4.0 he missed blocks ... wlthough all seemed fine ..
strange .. looking into ito

//edit: seems I needed to reanble block production

Do not publish price feeds until after hardfork and all clients are upgraded. This is a new operation that is part of the hardfork. All old clients will reject blocks containing publish price feed operation. This is the reason for missed blocks.

Large transaction and block sizes are also part of the hardfork, and could result in missed blocks.

console.log was disabled by default in previous update for security concerns. It can be enabled using --log-commands argument.

Delegates are still free to upgrade but must be aware that there a crashing issue has been identified. Brave delegates can upgrade and run client in a debugger to help us get a stack trace of the crash.

liondani

will upgrade but hold off feeds2 until clarifications will made  ;)
[url="https://www.steempeak.com/@liondani"]https://www.steempeak.com/@liondani[/url]

CalabiYau


cgafeng

running 0.4 and works fine for now, did't publish price feeds.
BTC:1EYwcZ9cYVj6C9LMLafdcjK9wicVMDV376

GaltReport

Quote from: Riverhead on August 15, 2014, 03:17:11 PM
Quote from: GaltReport on August 15, 2014, 03:16:19 PM
Quote from: xeroc on August 15, 2014, 03:12:36 PM
if you have a delegate running then you should update .. at the end everything is running fine .. at least at my end :)
what about price feeds?  Don't see any crystal clear instructions on that.
I am on 0.4.0 without issue but have not touched price feeds yet.

Okay, I'll do the upgrade but hold off on feeds.

Riverhead

Quote from: GaltReport on August 15, 2014, 03:16:19 PM
Quote from: xeroc on August 15, 2014, 03:12:36 PM
if you have a delegate running then you should update .. at the end everything is running fine .. at least at my end :)
what about price feeds?  Don't see any crystal clear instructions on that.
I am on 0.4.0 without issue but have not touched price feeds yet.

GaltReport

Quote from: xeroc on August 15, 2014, 03:12:36 PM
if you have a delegate running then you should update .. at the end everything is running fine .. at least at my end :)
what about price feeds?  Don't see any crystal clear instructions on that.

xeroc

if you have a delegate running then you should update .. at the end everything is running fine .. at least at my end :)