Author Topic: The first ever bitUSD  (Read 1240 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline bitcoinerS

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 592
    • View Profile
Code: [Select]
>>> blockchain_market_order_history USD BTSX
   TYPE                         PRICE                     PAID                 RECEIVED                FEES              TIMESTAMP
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Buy0.04597701149425287 USD / BTSX              15.9998 USD           347.99782 BTSX          0.0000 USD    2014-08-25T20:43:30
   Sell0.04597701149425287 USD / BTSX           347.99782 BTSX              15.9998 USD        0.00000 BTSX    2014-08-25T20:43:30
    Buy0.04608294930875576 USD / BTSX               4.9999 USD           108.50000 BTSX          0.0000 USD    2014-08-25T20:41:40
   Sell0.04608294930875576 USD / BTSX           108.50000 BTSX               4.9999 USD        0.00000 BTSX    2014-08-25T20:41:40
    Buy0.04608294930875576 USD / BTSX               9.9999 USD           217.00000 BTSX          0.0000 USD    2014-08-25T20:40:10
   Sell0.04608294930875576 USD / BTSX           217.00000 BTSX               9.9999 USD        0.00000 BTSX    2014-08-25T20:40:10
    Buy0.04608294930875576 USD / BTSX              45.3917 USD           985.00000 BTSX          0.0000 USD    2014-08-25T20:39:00

>>> approve bitcoiners

Offline svk

Nice! I'll try to find time to include assets in the info on the website later today!
Worker: dev.bitsharesblocks

Offline tonyk

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3308
    • View Profile
OK we know that bitUSD are in circulation now!!!

I am trying to figure out which is the first one ever! But I am badly lacking the tools to do so. Can somebody help, 1. in which block this happened; 2.by which delegate 3.What was the transaction id?


I believe the first block in which bitUSD started its life is this one:

---------------------------------------------
Block # 314431
Previous block Next block
Block details
Timestamp:   Aug 25, 2014 4:46:30 PM
Delegate signee:   coolspeed

# of transactions   1
Total transaction value:   25.000 BTSX
Fees:   0.500 BTSX
Block size:   382 bytes
Latency:   0
Processing Time:   0.010271
Hashes
Previous:   d004c908556272d01758426c32797244b717aa7d
Transaction digest:   c8cf12fe3180ed901a58a0697a522f1217de72d04529bd255627a4ad6164f0f0
Next secret hash:   8ed8140a34347be0ac36b64d9e796cc8f849b530
Previous secret:   d12b6155b529d33311f049dad522b6cc8cd264cf
Transaction 314431.1
Transaction value:   25.500 BTSX
Type:   Register account
Votes in transaction:   For delegate:

--------------------

So my answerers to q 1 and 2 are

1.Block # 314431
2. Delegate :   coolspeed

But I am far from certain in this.


Lack of arbitrage is the problem, isn't it. And this 'should' solves it.