I thought 0.4.17 fixed the short-matching bug?

Started by biophil, September 25, 2014, 05:37:26 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

bytemaster

It will restore to the GUI that came with your download 0.4.17
For the latest updates checkout my blog: [url="http://bytemaster.bitshares.org"]http://bytemaster.bitshares.org[/url]
Anything said on these forums does not constitute an intent to create a legal obligation or contract between myself and anyone else.   These are merely my opinions and I reserve the right to change them at any time.

biophil

Quote from: toast on September 25, 2014, 08:55:44 PM
I think there's a new bug... It matches against a short if there's a tiny ask for it to partially match against first

Delightful.
Support our research efforts to improve BitAsset price-pegging! Vote for worker 1.14.204 "201907-uccs-research-project."

tonyk

Quote from: biophil on September 25, 2014, 08:51:49 PM
Does nobody else see the bid overlapping with the short wall?

I do not... what is the price for that bid?
now I do.
Lack of arbitrage is the problem, isn't it. And this 'should' solves it.

toast

I think there's a new bug... It matches against a short if there's a tiny ask for it to partially match against first
Do not use this post as information for making any important decisions. The only agreements I ever make are informal and non-binding. Take the same precautions as when dealing with a compromised account, scammer, sockpuppet, etc.

biophil

Does nobody else see the bid overlapping with the short wall?
Support our research efforts to improve BitAsset price-pegging! Vote for worker 1.14.204 "201907-uccs-research-project."

biophil

Quote from: tonyk on September 25, 2014, 08:42:46 PM
Quote from: biophil on September 25, 2014, 08:38:25 PM
Quote from: tonyk on September 25, 2014, 08:35:04 PM
Quote from: biophil on September 25, 2014, 08:33:27 PM
Quote from: tonyk on September 25, 2014, 08:28:36 PM
Quote from: biophil on September 25, 2014, 08:25:32 PM

None of this explains why my bids weren't matching the short wall.
agree! it does not.

Try again I have some bitBTC for sale right now.


My bid just went in above the short price, highest collateralization is 30,000. Apparently not matching.
13,495.28 will not cut it... try something >= 13,510
[edit] you are on 0.4.17 right?

But I don't want to match the ask, I want to match the short.

Yeah, 0.4.17.

the ask has a better price... so you will have to wait somebody to buy it first...

My GUI was (and is? this new update isn't terribly self-explanatory) showing the short wall at the top of the order book. My bid should have matched a short, as should the new bid someone entered for 1 bitBTC.
Support our research efforts to improve BitAsset price-pegging! Vote for worker 1.14.204 "201907-uccs-research-project."

toast

Quote from: tonyk on September 25, 2014, 08:45:38 PM
File>Check for updates
is not working on win7/32bit...

Your bug report needs more details
Do not use this post as information for making any important decisions. The only agreements I ever make are informal and non-binding. Take the same precautions as when dealing with a compromised account, scammer, sockpuppet, etc.

tonyk

#13
Quote
File>Check for updates
is not working on win7/32bit...
scratch that    working with like 1 min delay...

OK The pop up asked me to update to 0.4.14; selecte 'no' to make backup first.
File>Check for updates
no reaction...
restarted the client
File>Check for updates
no reaction...
1 or 2 min later it finally asked me to update
Lack of arbitrage is the problem, isn't it. And this 'should' solves it.

tonyk

Quote from: biophil on September 25, 2014, 08:38:25 PM
Quote from: tonyk on September 25, 2014, 08:35:04 PM
Quote from: biophil on September 25, 2014, 08:33:27 PM
Quote from: tonyk on September 25, 2014, 08:28:36 PM
Quote from: biophil on September 25, 2014, 08:25:32 PM

None of this explains why my bids weren't matching the short wall.
agree! it does not.

Try again I have some bitBTC for sale right now.


My bid just went in above the short price, highest collateralization is 30,000. Apparently not matching.
13,495.28 will not cut it... try something >= 13,510
[edit] you are on 0.4.17 right?

But I don't want to match the ask, I want to match the short.

Yeah, 0.4.17.

the ask has a better price... so you will have to wait somebody to buy it first...
Lack of arbitrage is the problem, isn't it. And this 'should' solves it.

biophil

Quote from: tonyk on September 25, 2014, 08:35:04 PM
Quote from: biophil on September 25, 2014, 08:33:27 PM
Quote from: tonyk on September 25, 2014, 08:28:36 PM
Quote from: biophil on September 25, 2014, 08:25:32 PM

None of this explains why my bids weren't matching the short wall.
agree! it does not.

Try again I have some bitBTC for sale right now.


My bid just went in above the short price, highest collateralization is 30,000. Apparently not matching.
13,495.28 will not cut it... try something >= 13,510
[edit] you are on 0.4.17 right?

But I don't want to match the ask, I want to match the short.

Yeah, 0.4.17.
Support our research efforts to improve BitAsset price-pegging! Vote for worker 1.14.204 "201907-uccs-research-project."

tonyk

#10
Quote from: biophil on September 25, 2014, 08:33:27 PM
Quote from: tonyk on September 25, 2014, 08:28:36 PM
Quote from: biophil on September 25, 2014, 08:25:32 PM

None of this explains why my bids weren't matching the short wall.
agree! it does not.

Try again I have some bitBTC for sale right now.


My bid just went in above the short price, highest collateralization is 30,000. Apparently not matching.
13,495.28 will not cut it... try something >= 13,510
[edit] you are on 0.4.17 right?
Lack of arbitrage is the problem, isn't it. And this 'should' solves it.

biophil

Quote from: tonyk on September 25, 2014, 08:28:36 PM
Quote from: biophil on September 25, 2014, 08:25:32 PM

None of this explains why my bids weren't matching the short wall.
agree! it does not.

Try again I have some bitBTC for sale right now.

My bid just went in above the short price, highest collateralization is 30,000. Apparently not matching.
Support our research efforts to improve BitAsset price-pegging! Vote for worker 1.14.204 "201907-uccs-research-project."

tonyk

#8
Quote from: biophil on September 25, 2014, 08:25:32 PM

None of this explains why my bids weren't matching the short wall.
agree! it does not.

Try again I have some bitBTC for sale right now.
Lack of arbitrage is the problem, isn't it. And this 'should' solves it.

biophil

Quote from: tonyk on September 25, 2014, 08:23:28 PM
Quote from: biophil on September 25, 2014, 08:21:51 PM
Quote from: tonyk on September 25, 2014, 06:05:55 PM
Quote from: biophil on September 25, 2014, 05:51:29 PM
Hmm... What range are you talking about? Is it a range of valid collateralization? I wonder if that could be it. The top short has a collateral ratio of 20,000 BTSX/BitBTC, but 1.5x13,518 is greater than 20,000. So that would mean that every short in the order book is currently invalid until the price of BTC falls a little more.

I think this 20,000 BTSX/BitBTC is just the collateral that person trying to open a short position provides (i.e. does not include the proceeds of the bitBTC sell), partly because the sell price is unknown...

Is there a lower bound on the allowable collateral? so if the price is 13,333, could you short at anything less than 20,000?
@ 13,333 the min will be 13333 BTSX

Ah, because the sale proceeds are 13,333 and those are also held as collateral, so you have 200% collateral after the sale. Thanks.

None of this explains why my bids weren't matching the short wall.
Support our research efforts to improve BitAsset price-pegging! Vote for worker 1.14.204 "201907-uccs-research-project."

tonyk

Quote from: biophil on September 25, 2014, 08:21:51 PM
Quote from: tonyk on September 25, 2014, 06:05:55 PM
Quote from: biophil on September 25, 2014, 05:51:29 PM
Hmm... What range are you talking about? Is it a range of valid collateralization? I wonder if that could be it. The top short has a collateral ratio of 20,000 BTSX/BitBTC, but 1.5x13,518 is greater than 20,000. So that would mean that every short in the order book is currently invalid until the price of BTC falls a little more.

I think this 20,000 BTSX/BitBTC is just the collateral that person trying to open a short position provides (i.e. does not include the proceeds of the bitBTC sell), partly because the sell price is unknown...

Is there a lower bound on the allowable collateral? so if the price is 13,333, could you short at anything less than 20,000?
@ 13,333 the min will be 13333 BTSX and you will be last in line... following others offering more than the min.
Lack of arbitrage is the problem, isn't it. And this 'should' solves it.

biophil

Quote from: tonyk on September 25, 2014, 06:05:55 PM
Quote from: biophil on September 25, 2014, 05:51:29 PM
Hmm... What range are you talking about? Is it a range of valid collateralization? I wonder if that could be it. The top short has a collateral ratio of 20,000 BTSX/BitBTC, but 1.5x13,518 is greater than 20,000. So that would mean that every short in the order book is currently invalid until the price of BTC falls a little more.

I think this 20,000 BTSX/BitBTC is just the collateral that person trying to open a short position provides (i.e. does not include the proceeds of the bitBTC sell), partly because the sell price is unknown...

Is there a lower bound on the allowable collateral? so if the price is 13,333, could you short at anything less than 20,000?
Support our research efforts to improve BitAsset price-pegging! Vote for worker 1.14.204 "201907-uccs-research-project."

tonyk

#4
Quote from: biophil on September 25, 2014, 05:51:29 PM
Hmm... What range are you talking about? Is it a range of valid collateralization? I wonder if that could be it. The top short has a collateral ratio of 20,000 BTSX/BitBTC, but 1.5x13,518 is greater than 20,000. So that would mean that every short in the order book is currently invalid until the price of BTC falls a little more.

I think this 20,000 BTSX/BitBTC is just the collateral that person trying to open a short position provides (i.e. does not include the proceeds of the bitBTC sell), partly because the sell price is unknown...
Lack of arbitrage is the problem, isn't it. And this 'should' solves it.

biophil

Hmm... What range are you talking about? Is it a range of valid collateralization? I wonder if that could be it. The top short has a collateral ratio of 20,000 BTSX/BitBTC, but 1.5x13,518 is greater than 20,000. So that would mean that every short in the order book is currently invalid until the price of BTC falls a little more.
Support our research efforts to improve BitAsset price-pegging! Vote for worker 1.14.204 "201907-uccs-research-project."

xeroc

if the short is outside the range it becomes invalid .. thats why your order is not matched .. (imho)

biophil

In BitBTC market, I have a small bid in at 13,531.7999, and the short wall is at the top of the order book at 13,531.7997. Why is my bid not matching the shorts? And why is the short wall above the feed price of 13,518.9942?
Support our research efforts to improve BitAsset price-pegging! Vote for worker 1.14.204 "201907-uccs-research-project."