Any Chinese translators want to translate what is going on here?

Started by matt608, September 26, 2014, 07:24:15 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

serejandmyself

btsx - bitsharesrussia

serejandmyself

Quote from: tbkmcjl on September 27, 2014, 09:48:51 AM


Oh,who wants some Fund,post your BTSX account here,just for fun

Ill have some please ))) account - bitsharesrussia
btsx - bitsharesrussia

santaclause102

Quote from: tbkmcjl on September 27, 2014, 11:07:42 AM
Quote from: delulo on September 27, 2014, 10:53:50 AM
Does "fund" have any value? Or does the amount of fund just show that you are voting for some of the delegates in the fund group?

See this https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=5775.msg77810#msg77810
The happyshares concept would be harmful to any DPOS network if it is applied at scale.

I think the people who vote base on a small bribe does not have enough asset to control the system.
Rich guys who have much voting power will not accept a small bribe.

so,you get my point.after all ,DPOS voting power is not about head count,it's about the amount of the asset.

You are completely right with what you said! I would only be worried if a "voting culture" is established where shareholders do not vote anymore for the best delegates but instead for the biggest pay back.
Like you said there would be little benefit for big stakeholders to vote for delegates who are not the best for the job but give high pay backs. 2 Questions / issues arise here:
1) There is no difference between small and big shareholders here (with small shareholders the pack back is small compared to the effect they have on the delegates approval).
2) If such pay back culture is establish and wide spread once big shareholders might just do the same without thinking much about it because they might not completely comprehend that the benefit/cost ratio is negative here.

One question I have: Do you get "fund" proportional to the amount of stake you voted with or x amount of fund if you vote at all vote a delegate. The last option would be beneficial to the system because it would encourage voting at all...

Akado

Quote from: tbkmcjl on September 27, 2014, 12:35:00 PM
Quote from: Akado on September 27, 2014, 12:32:33 PM
may i also ask about this? https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=8973.45

they already have prints of a gui it seems. Could someone tell me the status on this? and will it be done using the BitShares Play blockchain?

https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=9393.0

here is the english link

Thank you!  :)
[url="https://metaexchange.info"]https://metaexchange.info[/url] | Bitcoin<->Altcoin exchange | Instant | Safe | Low spreads

Akado

may i also ask about this? https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=8973.45

they already have prints of a gui it seems. Could someone tell me the status on this? and will it be done using the BitShares Play blockchain?
[url="https://metaexchange.info"]https://metaexchange.info[/url] | Bitcoin<->Altcoin exchange | Instant | Safe | Low spreads

santaclause102

Does "fund" have any value? Or does the amount of fund just show that you are voting for some of the delegates in the fund group?

See this https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=5775.msg77810#msg77810
The happyshares concept would be harmful to any DPOS network if it is applied at scale.

lastagile

They are creating a new asset named FUND. Which is used to reward those people vote for them.

matt608

https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=9136.0

The Google translate doesn't make a whole lot of sense, but I'd quite like to know what they are talking about as it looks potentially somewhat important.

The Chinese section of bitsharestalk is very active, I wish the translations were better.