31
General Discussion / Re: Bitshares price discussion
« on: July 11, 2017, 08:54:00 am »
Such red, very stressful, many suicides, so downhill.
wow
wow
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
I saw big margin call had happen on these three market,
but the share holders seems refuse to take the 10% profit help others quit short position.
you need to know when the price continue drop, black swan will happen in these SILVER,
then these SILVER you hold will lose the value it can be.
sell your SILVER, take the 10% profit, this is what you should do, or your SILVER will not worth 1 real SILVER after the blackswan
Thanks Fuzzy. I just tuned in to your show the first time and appreciate all you do for BTS
SO many people here doing amazing things for BTS. So few known as well as they should be. The more resources I continue getting though...the more I will make that no longer true
It's not that complicated, and common sense dictates that you should not send your life savings ahead of actually performing small transactions and testing backup procedures to ensure that your funds remain accessible.
It is complicated. Don't attack people for not understanding it all out once. That's another problem with our community. We have had years of using this system so we understand the structure, but someone new to crypto of coming from another coin is not going to get at first.
We claim that for pro trader and not average ppl but that isn't true. Pro traders are not going to tolerate a bad interface. There are to many other options out there. I have been in Bitshares since AnglShares and this has been one of my pet peeves about the system.
Trezor support "soon"?
:DDDDDDDDDDDD
Full nodes expose an API and thus need the history plugins.
p2p2-consensus-nodes only store the blockchain and verify it
Yes .. plenty of discussion between devs .. and plenty of ways to address it
Not sure what to believe is going on here, but in the course of researching the issue, I found some interesting links to Ken's past:
https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/2vqhsr/dont_give_ukencode_any_of_your_money/
http://archive.is/XBw1a
There were some very serious allegations being made on steemit (top reply to the "chris, where are you post" of his, if you're interested) as well.. I thought, and indeed started, writing an article asking for clarifications on all of that, but no matter how neutral I wanted it to read, it always read like a hit piece.. so I ended up not publishing it.
I am very curious about what ken has to say about the allegations. Hopefully he can clear the situation up..
super old news, and we investigated a lot of time and text here in the forums on ken already. how did you manage to ignore this?
Businesses that run on top of BitShares have incentive to run their own nodes (think exchanges)
The memory mostly grows due to the market history and account history plugin. Those are only required for full-nodes, not for block producers, nor for p2p-consensus-nodes.
Not sure what to believe is going on here, but in the course of researching the issue, I found some interesting links to Ken's past:
https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/2vqhsr/dont_give_ukencode_any_of_your_money/
http://archive.is/XBw1a