It still shows that people need to provide the buy orders while in bitshares the protocol can deal with settlement (as a last resort)
I can admit that is true. However, so far Nushares has been able to provide sufficient incentive for people to have those buy and sell orders in place to hold the peg. It is unclear whether or not incentive can be maintained for a prolonged period of time (although it has worked quite well for over a year).
In my design I am proposing for Bitshares, it does away with the small army of people it takes to provide liquidity. It is almost purely autonomous, meanwhile Nubits' liquidity operations require a lot of "man power". My design would never succumb to the issue that post refers to since it is done autonomously.
Furthermore, my design is not meant to be a permanent solution like Nubits' solution is... it works like training wheels do on a bicycle. As soon as "natural liquidity" is established on the DEX, the autonomous liquidity operations cease and the BTS/SmartCoins that were used to provide it are burned.
I am about to post a more detailed synopsis that I have been working on all morning.
EDIT:
https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php/topic,21197.msg276084.html#msg276084or
https://www.docdroid.net/2OcoImM/autonomous-smartcoin-liquidity-funded-by-dilution.pdf.html