46
General Discussion / Re: BitHalo / BlackHalo addition to BitShares
« on: June 22, 2016, 04:38:55 pm »
cannot use openbazzar for this?
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
BTS is already a zombie.a lot of people loves zombies, me too
Danno, at same time I agree n disagree with you.I'm not sure what you're disagreeing with me on 2) about, as I read your message as supporting OPEN. asset coins as a viable trading methodology. I'm a big supporter of 2) for now (on a very technical level, too, as BlockTrades implements and supports the OpenLedger gateways for Ronny). I actually think it's the best solution we can afford now for many coins. But I think we should try 1) for coins we don't have time to support with a full gateway.
I agree,
4) make more coins born in graphene bitshares blockchain, it is pretty great we have peerplays, muse here.....if we could patner with more projects to born here with support that is pretty good way to grow this is pretty much make a decentrilised ecosystem grow from bottom to top, a plataform for projetcs n a exchange for them, decentrilised, top tech. Is there a lot projetcs borning everiday in crypto space, huge market.
I Disagree
2) In my opinion our partnership with openledger is a bless, they are promoting our tech, our bts, they are making it happen for them n for us......open.assets is the way the world works right now......you dont cut it because so you are out of game.....we have to join togheter n grow togheter try to bring transparency for open.assets....good volume for them, better for us, better for our tech, I know bad things can happen but we have to educate people about it
Sidechains I do not understand fully but it only makes sense if it can improve our game, but in a decentrilised way, if we are talking about multisig we could partner with supernet to bring a new player, a new option to people, but Im not sure that is the point but I would be glad to hear more about this.
Just to clarify what I'm calling a sidechain, it's a truly "trustless" method of sending coins in and out between two different blockchains without requiring any custodian(s). But implementing this isn't a small undertaking, and in the current state of crypto, it would have to be done on a coin-by-coin basis.
Thanks a lot guys for the explanations. The OPEN.X UIA concept is awesome, i hope to see it expand as other exchanges come on board like CCEDK is doing as a gateway. I applaud @ccedk for taking on this role and offering the UIAs. The next step should be some sort of escrow service and/or smart contract to lock up collateral against OPEN.X assets to eliminate the counterparty risk of the exchange(s) going under or losing funds.I dont understand the tech but I think It would be a kind of multisig, right? I really cant see how it could be much different than supernet, I dont know if there is a way to make something completely decentrilised, what bitshares have with open.asset n bitassets is pretty good......if we had 100000 volume in smartcoins we wouldnt talk about it anymore questioning ourselves why we are not there yet.... People are putting their trust in tether without nothing to back it, only trus it self, that is the point if smarcoins are wide accept they are simple widely accepted with a plus collateral guarantee.