I am a little confused.
Here are my understanding as follows:
In BTS X (including XT or XV version), PTS\AGS holders will have 50%\50%
While in future DACs like music, lotto, ME etc., PTS\AGS holders will have 10%\10%, and use the allocation plan BM just mentioned yesterday.
Am I right?
It is the responsibility of every DAC developer/operator to make those decisions
in competition with others who will try to make better decisions.
To get our support (and presumably your support) they must honor the 10% minimums.
To get our recommendation, a DAC must be most competitive and of greatest benefit to PTS/AGS holders (like ourselves) in the long run.
But the market will decide.
Stan, I am still confused.
Did you mean that AGS\PTS holders could only get 10%\10% when BTS XV or XC are released?
You will undoubtedly wind up owning several variants as several operators offer their own optimized clones. Whether the first full-featured 50/50 PTS/AGS chain beats some other competitor that allocates 10/10 and makes smarter use of the remaining 80% remains to be seen.
You will own shares in all of them so presumably the one the market likes best will make you the most money, regardless of the initial percentages. Keep them all or sell the ones you don't think will succeed.
Never before have investors had the chance to own ALL the competing options for the price of one. How's that for hedging your bets?
So there will be two chains? BTS1 AGS holders 50% PTS holders 50%
another one BTS2 AGS holders 10% PTS holders 10% delegate 80%
or maybe more? BTS 3\4\5\6………………………………
I feel quite doubtful about the whole thing, and I cannot see any promising future about the whole thing
First of all, with so many chains, if there is someone who wants to buy BTS, which one should he buy? he will be confused and he will be not sure which one to buy and will not want to buy because he will be not sure which one will be the final version.
second, before, all the people thought AGS\PTS would get 50%\50%, so they made the investment, but now they were told they might only get 10% or 10%? plus, if you said you would let the market decide, the fact woule be that, if PTS AGS holders only get 10% instead of 50%, the other people could get the rest 80%, of course people would like this plan. it is just like if the people who originally have a lot of money now have to spare their money to the poor people. of course this plan would be more welcome by the people, because poor people are much more.
sorry for my words, i am just very very XX right now.