XTS6TMMu8B5MBEgj2kg9pGF8dzrWBtj5CpKHHQxM3x4EsvD4mJMUK should be named "init-delegate-1" (is currently init-delegate-1).
XTS7diW1nWPWrxkwuqXkwmxFN4qrQ7jyVNcRhqGqrriVvK2udynhD should be named "Angel" (is currently init-delegate-2).
XTS7bUdQ41J4vhNVBkmbqDKGiftrmQNrL1vCx881Fg4R2hE5r6P2Z should be named "Investor" (is currently init-delegate-3).
XTS6XtS7F5Fy3dUVSUKHJHN1dC66VaruRFkKmo8um6QB24Xsf2mzF should be named "Democratic" (is currently init-delegate-4).
XTS8ZhbpwEgwgV1gjCNrYfMDxsB6diofNtsg1m4yN62Zii1EwpK7B should be named "Gamble" (is currently init-delegate-25).
I'd be really happy to see some comments on this:
Here is a proposal that sounds right to me:
1 Give all of the initial delegates the names they want
2 Assign the total trust to ALL initial delegates to no more than 0.01% of all shares
3 Assign ONE special untrusted-delegate with 99.99% of the votes and never enable it. (throw its private key into the deepest river you can find)
4 Let the people rule
Is there something wrong with the above ?
PS: I know how hard it is to organize everything. You are doing great job. Keep going.
PPS: If point 3 is difficult due to the max 2% per delegate you can use 50 special untrusted-delegates and destroy all their keys.