BitShares Forum
Main => Technical Support => Topic started by: btswolf on October 25, 2015, 12:42:14 pm
-
What are the plans for PlasmaOS?
Will it be some kind of a atomic cross-chain protocol?
Is it going to be a upgrade for GrapheneOS or a new product independent from Graphene and BitShares?
(http://i.imgur.com/Snduyzf.png)
-
My guess, and it's just that, is this is Bitshares 2.1 or 3.0 or something in the same convention as Mavericks -> Yosemite -> El Capitan.
-
Looks to be interoperable between many chains.
-
Considering the differences between POW-DOS to BitShars OS and from there to GrapheneOS .. I would assume it's not as easy as just adding a Bond market or having xchain compatibility ..
I am confident they have somthing more "pinky" in their pipeline :D
-
Will it be some kind of a atomic cross-chain protocol?
I'm going to guess the answer is no, judging by Dan's past opinions on ACCT.
-
If we told you, we'd have to shoot you.
-
it is the first blockchain running on multiple servers on the solarsystem!
at the moment
- earth
- mars
- jupiter
agreed to joined this small step for a blockchain, but a big leap for mankind!
they are also in the talks with venus.
-
If we told you, we'd have to shoot you.
Maybe in the thigh? I'm sure we could pass a hat around and someone would volunteer :).
-
If we told you, we'd have to shoot you.
Maybe in the thigh? I'm sure we could pass a hat around and someone would volunteer :).
You don't want to be shot in the thigh. The foot maybe, but not the thigh.
-
If we told you, we'd have to shoot you.
Maybe in the thigh? I'm sure we could pass a hat around and someone would volunteer :).
You don't want to be shot in the thigh. The foot maybe, but not the thigh.
I already shoot myself in the foot often enough.
-
I already shoot myself in the foot often enough.
(http://static2.fjcdn.com/thumbnails/comments/I+love+how+the+interview+dude+is+just+brushing+his+_415dde90eeb36b945a303f9a3366e68e.gif)
-
Will it be some kind of a atomic cross-chain protocol?
I'm going to guess the answer is no, judging by Dan's past opinions on ACCT.
I agree. although it would be nice to have this even if only to graphene chains, meaning we could have a single bitUSD for all chains. Would make sense given the name :P at least if i get shot now we will know the truth.
Would like to speculate on more ideas but that's the only thing i can come up with atm