Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - cube

Pages: 1 ... 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 [89] 90 91 92 93 94
1321
KeyID / Re: High-pay delegates for transparent faucets
« on: October 03, 2014, 05:37:04 pm »
I just setup a delegate bitcube with a faucet at the following URL:

http://bit.cubeconnex.com:5555

I am creating a new twitter, google and facebook accounts to facilitate this faucet.  The layout and design will be enhanced later.

Edit: The authentication using twitter and google can work now.  I suppose I need DNS 'coins' to enable the faucet to register KeyIDs, right?  Where can I get some DNS to start the operation? 

ps: I missed the snapshot phase.

1322
KeyID / Re: [DNS] v0.0.2 - Trade the snapshot and fight for delegate pay
« on: October 03, 2014, 03:27:00 pm »
I would like to set up a delegate. Can someone please send 1 DNS to bitcube?

Thanks in advance.

1323
KeyID / Re: BitsharesBlocks DNS/KeyID!
« on: October 03, 2014, 01:47:19 pm »
Well done!  +5%

1324
KeyID / Re: Exchanges?
« on: October 03, 2014, 01:45:28 pm »
Let's have people post here as soon as exchanges enable DNS for trading here. I thought they'd do an IOU as they did with BTSX.

By the way what would the symbol be? Is this under Bitshares brand? BTSD? BDNS?

Just DNS?

How about trading within bitshare wallet?  btsx <--> DNS   ;D

1325
KeyID / Re: [DNS] v0.0.2 - Trade the snapshot and fight for delegate pay
« on: October 03, 2014, 01:43:29 pm »
Can someone send 1 DNS to bitcube?

Thank you.

1326
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: Delegate bitcube - Please vote for me :)
« on: October 02, 2014, 07:31:08 pm »
Upgraded to v0.4.19.  Has been stable.
lucky you .. running 2 nodes on 19 and one on 18 (delegate)
both 19ers crash regularily :-\

I read it could be a memory issue.

I saw the post requiring us to downgrade v0.4.19.  Just as I was recompiling the previous version, I saw v0.4.20 newly released in github.  I upgrade to v0.4.20 and it has been stable.  Have you tried v0.4.20?

1327
General Discussion / Re: segfault in 0.4.19
« on: October 02, 2014, 07:23:08 pm »
0.4.20 seems to hold up fine. Great job on the quick fix, thanks! I will be able to sleep tight tonight  :P

Just updated to 0.4.20.  It has been stable.  Thanks for the fast response.

1328
Quote
I mean I would perhaps expose my stake to being stolen. Loading a wallet onto a PC and unlocking it to vote could potentially get it stolen if I had a Trojan/key logger or something I was unaware of - I'm a point and click guy, but this a concern/possibility right?

I have the same concerns...And since I am not a tech guy I don't know how secure are my funds when my wallet is unlocked for voting..
Security wise is my wallet exposed like if I have a ppc wallet unlocked for minting, the same exposure as my btc wallet when synchoniosed to the networl, less secure or more secure?

Yes. Most people would have these concerns. Key loggers and malware permitting remote spying/control are tools that hackers can use to pry some coins out of the wallet.  If you have a large sum, unlock the wallet just for voting and once done, send the excess fund into cold storage.

1329
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: Delegate bitcube - Please vote for me :)
« on: October 02, 2014, 12:44:55 pm »
Upgraded to v0.4.19.  Has been stable.

1330
General Discussion / Re: segfault in 0.4.19
« on: October 02, 2014, 12:39:25 pm »
I have been running 0.4.19 for a few hours now.  So far being stable. No crash.

1331
Technical Support / Re: How to profit from Music DAC Snapshot
« on: September 30, 2014, 10:14:00 am »
...
Any consensus will ultimately be defied by the market because the weight of capital acting in unison will create a different and unexpected outcome (think how impossible it is to get set when everybody acts in unison). That is why the market peak and behaviour has shifted with each new DAC, as everyone keeps adjusting behaviour based on the last experience, ignoring the obvious game that everyone is doing likewise. It is more profitable to fade the herd, or if that cannot be gauged easily, invest with a longer term view on whether you think the investment is worthwhile or not.
...

I think that says it.  +5%

1332
Technical Support / Re: How to profit from Music DAC Snapshot
« on: September 30, 2014, 04:07:44 am »
...
Also, since the DNS DAC is already snapshoted, why isn't there more activity here on the forum related to the DNS DAC?

Because the developer is still developing and testing the DNS DAC application.  Got to wait for it to be ready.

As for the MUSIC Dac, the latest news is that there will be a pre-sales event (ie funding event) AFTER the snapshot. This means the shares derived from this snapshot would be worth less somewhat.   I do not expect PTS price to hold.

1333
Technical Support / Re: How to profit from Music DAC Snapshot
« on: September 29, 2014, 08:55:47 am »
Before BTSX snapshot back in FEB if I remember correctly PTS were worth $25-$30 dollars and after the snapshot the price decreased very brutally. Many, including me didn't see that coming and kept buying PTS... So based on that yes, PTS price falls after the snapshot.

BUT!!! Since then things have changed remarkably! DNS-Vote snapshot happened and PTS price after the snapshot didn't fell much. Just fell a little bit and recouped very easily back to pre-snapshot levels, even if bitcoin was falling in price.
...


PTS was around 0.03BTC before the FEB snapshot and plunged to around 0.01BTC after the snapshot.  The drop is significant.  Things changed after the first snapshot. The slight is smaller but much earlier . Take for example, in the latest snapshot in Aug 2014, the price spiked to around 0.009BTC (from around 0.0065BTC) immediately after the announcement which was one to two weeks before the snapshot.  It peaked at 0.009 and started sliding down to 0.007 one week before the snapshot.  It dropped from 0.007 to 0.0055 right after the snapshot.

I am seeing similar trend now.  The price should be reaching its peak soon or is at it now.

Edit: One thing for sure. If I were you, I would not bet my rent on it.  It is not worth the risk.

1334
Thank you.  You have my vote  :)

1335
General Discussion / Re: Feeds without delegates....maybe a better solution?
« on: September 28, 2014, 08:34:37 pm »
I think we should first start down voting delegates that don't do there job properly

I mentioned already that some delegates seem to be too lazy while standby delegates most certainly are not.

As a standby delegate, I tried to put in a feed but encountered error.  So no go.  Standby delegate cannot publish feeds.

I believe there are other standby delegates like me who are eager and capable to perform this role, and are waiting for the opportunity to be given.  :)

Pages: 1 ... 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 [89] 90 91 92 93 94