Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - sahkan

Pages: 1 ... 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 [10] 11 12 13 14 15 16 17
136
Full node has all the history plug-ins. Are you running one? If not you can connect to mine like so:
Code: [Select]
./programs/cli_wallet/cli_wallet -s wss://dexnode.net/ws

137
An example:

Code: [Select]
get_market_history BTS USD 3600 "2017-07-01T00:00:00" "2017-07-02T00:00:00"
Output:
Code: [Select]
get_market_history BTS USD 3600 "2017-07-01T00:00:00" "2017-07-02T00:00:00"
[{
    "id": "5.1.1768216",
    "key": {
      "base": "1.3.0",
      "quote": "1.3.121",
      "seconds": 3600,
      "open": "2017-07-01T00:00:00"
    },
    "high_base": 283,
    "high_quote": 6,
    "low_base": 129072761,
    "low_quote": 3173899,
    "open_base": 427095301,
    "open_quote": 10000000,
    "close_base": 129072761,
    "close_quote": 3173899,
    "base_volume": 1645300312,
    "quote_volume": 39864423
  },{
...

You have to be connected to a FULL node.

139
Technical Support / Re: Failed to sync with the API server
« on: July 10, 2017, 06:19:35 pm »
I'm also having the same problem now. None of the listed Full Node API servers are working. All are giving the "failed to sync with the API" error message.
There was an issue with the network couple hours ago. It's coming back up, my FULL node is being rebuild and should be back up shortly.

140
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: [Witness Proposal] sahkan-bitshares
« on: July 10, 2017, 08:15:46 am »
Poloniex doesn't need to run a full node. They should run node with these values configured:

Code: [Select]
track-account = "1.2.20067"
partial-operations = true

Then it will require around 2GB of RAM.

By the way, if you configured your node with "max-ops-per-account" correctly (then it won't be a "full node" any more), it should use around 4GB of RAM but not more than 20GB, so perhaps there is something wrong with your config file. Please note that the new parameters should be added above the first logging section, but not at the end of config.ini file.
Indeed, I added it at the end of the config.ini. But I want to run a full node on my wallet so I will just remove it.

141
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: [Witness Proposal] sahkan-bitshares
« on: July 06, 2017, 05:27:10 am »
July Witness Update

Witness performace:



As a reminder from @abit to reduce RAM usage for witness nodes, set these parameters in config.ini (since version 2.0.170531)
Code: [Select]
track-account = "1.2.1"
partial-operations = true
The witness RAM requirements are now under 2GB RAM.

Full Node:



The node was completely updated over the weekend. Additional parameters in config.ini (since version 2.0.170606) set to:

Code: [Select]
[code]partial-operations = true
max-ops-per-account = 1000

In the Peerplays telegram channel few days ago JB mentioned that Poloniex complained about the memory usage on their BitShares Full Node. I am not sure if this continues to be an issue (I would think that they should be able to afford a decent server to run BTS) but once again they are displaying their " BTS is currently under maintenance or experiencing wallet/network issues. Deposits and withdrawals will remain disabled until a solution is found, which may require an update from the BTS team. Any updates must be tested and audited before enabling." banner. As you can see from my snapshot above the Full Node runs at about 27.4GB RAM. As we continue to grow and with the latest mods to decrease the memory usage on witnesses, the Full nodes will have to do the heavy lifting for the infrastructure.

Haven't stopped into the referral system so far. With your own faucet you become the default registrar/referer for account create/upgrade, if there's no LTM account (or enough funds?) present in the wallets that uses your node to interface with the blockchain?
For the moment I have not switched to my own faucet. I use the OL's atm.  Setting up a faucet is on my to do list.

Witnesses aside, If the above is true, couldn't we use committee or worker proposals as a temporal fix by choosing full nodes to be included in upcoming light-wallet and bitshares.org/wallet releases?
I have already created an update to bitshares-ui on github for this. All new wallets should include the API access for my node. Some web wallets (OL) take only select updates and might not have it included.

Would that be incentive enough to run public full nodes and web wallets without running a business nor marketing, just the required infrastructure?
There is no incentive for it. For now only gateways really need them. But we definitely need more to provide a better experience for the users.

Last month there were no takers for my 1K BTS giveaway. So here is another chance:
Rules:
1. You have voted for my witness: sahkan-bitshares and kept your vote through at least 31 July 2017.
2. Giveaway runs through 31 JUL 2017
3. Be the FIRST to post below: "I'LL TAKE THE 1,000BTS!" and PM me your BTS account name.
4. I will send your BTS sometime during the first week of August.
5. If you are using a Proxy and the Proxy is voting on my witness you are eligible!
5. :) Good Luck!

Have a great BitShares July!

142
Voted! But as a reminder to ALL BTS holders, anyone that supports this worker should head out to their "Voting page for workers" and vote on this proposed worker.

143
Technical Support / Re: Changing the brainkey?
« on: June 30, 2017, 05:22:58 am »
Let me rephrase this..

The help section states about the brainkey :

"If you never manually imported an account key into your wallet, you can alternatively backup your accounts and their funds by exporting the brainkey, a string of words from which your keys are derived deterministically"

What im trying to do is create a new wallet where i can determine my own brainkey and import the private of my existing account so that i could at the very least always restore my wallet on a new computer by simply remembering a phrase. However, according to the above statement i cant do that after importing the key to my new wallet.

I guess i could just transfer from one account to another, but is there a way to change the brainkey on an existing wallet?
I have not tested this myself, but under the light Wallet, SETTINGS, WALLET there is an option to reset your brainkey sequence. Maybe that will do what you need?

144
Technical Support / Re: HERO trading disabled in BTS DEX
« on: June 30, 2017, 03:01:37 am »
I have the same issue the download of a new wallet seemed to be the same version number .170215 and i could not get my account to open in it.
It should be version# 170522. Looks like the links on the website are pointing to the new versions.

145
Technical Support / Re: Failed to sync with the API server
« on: June 30, 2017, 02:58:16 am »
When running my self-compiled witness_node (the process of which also had certain issues I had to tediously correct manually) and pointing the Bitshares Light Client to it, I get a "Failed to sync with the API server" message.

The computer clocks are correct.

How do I fix this?

Is the message showing up because the blockchain has yet to sync to the latest available blocks?
Wait till your node syncs with the network then when you open your Light Wallet you should see an output from your node that it has opened a new DB or something similar. That way you will know that you connected to your node.

146
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: Proxy: bitcrab - make the ecosystem grow
« on: June 28, 2017, 05:45:28 pm »
Then you don't understand the potential of SmartCoin derivatives and the profits they can make for both shareholders and the network.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Derivative_(finance;)
I think you failed to understand my answer. But at least the point got across.

147
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: [Witness Proposal] sahkan-bitshares
« on: June 28, 2017, 05:38:46 pm »
IMPORTANT

Sometime this weekend I will be running updates on my FULL node - API & web wallet server (dexnode.net). Please make sure that your wallets are backed up! It almost quadrupled in user connections since last update.

148
General Discussion / Re: Cryptofresh update, feedback
« on: June 28, 2017, 05:27:03 pm »
There is no denying that cryptofresh.com is a great tool and people use it on consistent basis. However on several occasions (over few months) you have stated that you will make it open source and you haven't, until that happens this remains a personal project and as such it can be turned off by you at ANY TIME. An open source explorer would allow others to contribute to the code and mirror the block explorer itself so we don't have to get continually frustrated with the time outs on the cryptofresh.com page. I understand that you put a lot of work into it and atm it's a flagship for BitShares, but you have to understand that worker proposals are not designed to fund personal projects. If you don't want to make it an open source and help it grow by allowing others to improve the code I can't bring myself to support your worker.

149
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: Proxy: bitcrab - make the ecosystem grow
« on: June 26, 2017, 06:29:21 pm »
I may set my proxy to bitcrab if you provide a price feed for bitBTC!

https://roelandp.nl/bitshareswitnesslog/?witness=jerryliu
With OPEN.BTC, bitBTC is not really needed. I believe that's his point, somewhat valid since we are duplicating BTC on the DEX.

150
Technical Support / Re: Can I access public nodes in CLI_wallet?
« on: June 14, 2017, 06:16:12 am »
Try
Code: [Select]
./programs/cli_wallet/cli_wallet -s wss://dexnode.net/ws
your connection might be timing out to that node.

Pages: 1 ... 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 [10] 11 12 13 14 15 16 17