now beos began to show his power, he voted in a dead witness which didn't active 1 year,

Code: [Select]

wackou #25,446,974 last year 1343 388,144,015 BTS
and he voted in the cheater witness crazybit again.
he can vote in these junk witness because bitcrab, xeroc, cn-vote, clockwork have support more than 25 witnesses.
so be carefull, Bitshares is in a situation of big centralize risk.
if you want to vote out these junk witess, make sure you vote for max 21 witness.
and I suggest withdraw proxy to bitcrab, which still vote for almost 30 witness after this mention.

Quote from: alt on May 16, 2019, 12:49:54 am

UPDATE:
there are 360M vote power belong to beos now, and there are 13 witness have more than 360M vote support from others than beos.
this means if we approve 27 witness, beos can vote in other 14 self account as active witness and take away the main chain.

so everybody please make sure vote for less than 25 witness to ensure Bithsares is not in control by a centrol.

Quote from: alt on May 07, 2019, 04:21:24 am

for now, there are totally about 900M BTS participate the witness vote, BEOS have 300M vote power
there are about 21 witness got more than 300M BTS support without BEOS's help.
this means when there are extra about 150M BTS(this is very close already) vote for a number more than 43, BEOS got the chance to vote for another 22 self account as the active witness, and can take over the main chain.

and if we consider those witness who get 400M BTS support without BEOS's help as a safe line, there are only 16 witness beyond this line,
this means we should keep the active witness number below 31 to ensure BEOS can't get the chance easily to set 17 self accounts as active witness.

Of course you need to have reasonable configuration. But surely, if a single witness publishes a feed that is 5% (or more) away from feed price, the proxy should at least be notified.

Unvoting a witnesses can be justified when the last feed was older than 2 days, or when he doesn't follow consensus when it comes to MSSR or MCR.

I wrote this code in my spare time, as usual ..

Quote from: alt on May 09, 2019, 09:30:14 pm

I can't imagine what logic can be used to implement disapprove witness automaticly based on the feed price.
it's unresponsoble to vote witness automaticly by proxy, if somebody did this, please let me know.
BTW, did this development pay by worker income?

Quote from: xeroc on May 09, 2019, 12:32:41 pm

While we are at it, I started working on a python project that is supposed to automatically disapprove (unvote) witnesses that provide inaccurate feeds (relative to price feed) here:

https://github.com/xeroc/witness-monitor

Any development resources to improve that would be welcome.

Quote from: bitProfessor on May 08, 2019, 03:46:08 am

Quote from: bitProfessor on May 08, 2019, 03:40:10 am

1. 发起投票：缩减见证人的投票。
2.  理由： 对于见证人投票存在'中心化'的风险，所以对一些见证人撤票，敬请谅解。详细内容见帖子：
https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=28377.0
3.  方式：由教授发起，同意的批准，不同意的不用做任何操作。

此次投票的见证名单：
#   账户   
1   in.abit   
2   bangzi   
3   zapata42-witness      
4   witness.hiblockchain   
5   btspp-witness      
6   delegate-zhaomu   
7   verbaltech2   
8   xeldal   
9   fox   
10   clockwork   
11   bhuz   
12   blckchnd   
13   delegate-1.lafona   
14   roelandp   
15   sahkan-bitshares   
16   xn-delegate   
17   delegate.freedom   
18   openledger-dc   
19   magicwallet.witness   
20   gdex-witness   
21   witness.yao   
22   abc123            
23   xman            
24   roadscape            
25   zbbtsbp            
26   mr.agsexplorer

对于前期刚刚通过的ioex的投票为什么也撤销了？