Especially as a wallet becomes more polished and professional the potential to attract lay-users who are more apathetic increases, making hard-coding ever more dangerous.
This is a very important point that I wanted to bring attention to. People will start downloading the wallet, and they won't care how it's voting.
People often call 'voter apathy' a problem but as Stan has said in a recent BCT topic of his, people who don't vote are basically delegating their votes to the people that do vote. Usually, people opt to do this when they know that they don't have the knowledge to make informed decisions, and don't have the time to do the research that would allow them to be informed. Let's call this group 'aware non-voters'.
Some people don't vote simply just because they are lazy; let's call these people 'the lazies'.
There is also a group of individuals that don't even understand or think about voting at all. In this case, they are implicitly doing the same as the knowingly-ignorant, delegating their votes to the people that do vote; let's call this group 'ignorant non-voters'.
By hard-coding delegates, you are exploiting the ignorant non-voters and the lazies, inserting them inside the Moonstone matrix, harvesting the votes that they either don't realize they have, or don't care about. While the ignorant non-voters group is currently small, our targeted demographic will most likely bring many, many more of them, to the point where they will outnumber us by a long-shot. They will all be voting for you without understanding that that is what they are doing, and you will be impossible to vote out.
We cannot let this happen, or else
DecentralizeEconomics is right. The voting power of the voluntary will be stolen.