0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Quote from: Marky0001 on February 18, 2016, 02:38:45 pmAs I already explained, he is most likely exiting the "project". When i look at augur I really hate my self for not dumping my notes at 400sat and move all the money into augur!I looked at the augur project, it seems to be nothing more than decentralized gambling
As I already explained, he is most likely exiting the "project". When i look at augur I really hate my self for not dumping my notes at 400sat and move all the money into augur!
We have devs for our platforms, we are just looking for and testing out graphene/MUSE devs.
As stated earlier. We are moving slowly due to limited funds.We have devs for our platforms, we are just looking for and testing out graphene/MUSE devs.Basically looking for a badass that can focus merely on MUSE maintenance first, and improvements second.And no mark, I'm not setting up an exit plan. That "fake leak" was not a machiavellian plan, I was excited to share with you guys and posted.. which gave heart attacks to the internal team and withdrew it. You need to understand I was a bitshares forumer BEFORE the BitShares Music project took place. I share the same open source + transparency opinions as most people here. This is what attracted me to BitShares in the first place! The corporate world does NOT share my ancapness. I'm stuck in the middle between this community and the corporates (which want this project to succeed just as much as you do btw!)The secret sauce post was a classic PR fuck up by yours truly.And btw PeerTracks currently can't die. With the low overhead we currently have we are good for a long time at this rate.In march we can show off videos, one from the fan side of peertracks, the other from the artist side.You'll get more than just videos of peertracks in action in March too.Oh and btw (totally unrelated just excited to share) I've found a couple non-music stars that are 2000% down for showing off the first feature release of the platform and onboarding their fan base into the system. The energy and creativity these people have will really demonstrate the power of what we are doing.Back to work I go!
I don't blame xeroc I simply think he was honest!No money no progress as already mentioned 1000x in these threads!It seems like cob is the only guy chasing this rabbit not understanding that it won't work.As an investor I feel like we need more transparency and not those empty teasers!I still don't like the fact that cob published some fake secret sauce crap last year and removed it some minutes afterwards just to make us believe they found the holy grail!That's not professional and will hurt the project!
Lol... Need more funds!That's why I still think cob is on a well planned exit strategy! First he placed the seeds for the bad outlook and step by step you guys try to convince the investors that the outcome was inevitable.More funds is an honest statement, because cob likes to tell us that the money is still there to run this "business"
Quote from: Endless on February 14, 2016, 10:51:58 pmSo one server controls the Muse network? I thought everything was decentralized?The network is decentralized .. the faucet however is not! The actual entry point coded into this particular hosted wallet is neither.you can still host your own wallet/faucet if you want
So one server controls the Muse network? I thought everything was decentralized?
Quote from: valzav on February 14, 2016, 04:20:44 pmFixed - the API server was down for some reason.So one server controls the Muse network? I thought everything was decentralized?
Fixed - the API server was down for some reason.