3496
General Discussion / Re: network down??
« on: January 04, 2016, 01:32:08 am »I should have a patch ready soon.Thanks. Instructions needed.
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
I should have a patch ready soon.Thanks. Instructions needed.
get_settle_orders GOLD 100
[{
"owner": "1.2.95758",
"balance": {
"amount": 0,
"asset_id": "1.3.106"
},
"settlement_date": "2016-01-04T00:19:54"
}
]
2016-01-04T00:19:51 th_a:invoke handle_block handle_block ] Got block: #2359544 time: 2016-01-04T00:19:51 latency: 184 ms from
: roadscape irreversible: 2359526 (-18) application.cpp:496
2016-01-04T00:20:06 th_a:invoke handle_transaction handle_transaction ] Got 1 transactions from network applic
ation.cpp:545
2016-01-04T00:20:10 th_a:invoke handle_transaction handle_transaction ] Got 1 transactions from network applic
ation.cpp:545
2016-01-04T00:20:47 th_a:invoke handle_transaction handle_transaction ] Got 1 transactions from network applic
ation.cpp:545
2016-01-04T00:21:00 th_a:Witness Block Production _push_block ] Failed to push new block:
10 assert_exception: Assert Exception
call.debt > 0 && call.collateral > 0 && settle.balance.amount > 0:
{}
th_a db_market.cpp:236 match
{"call":{"id":"1.8.1318","borrower":"1.2.97590","collateral":3104433333,"debt":50000,"call_price":{"base":{"amount":3104433333,"asset_id":"1.3.0"},"quote":{"amount":87500,"asset_id":"1.3.106"}}},"settle":{"owner":"1.2.95758","balance":{"amount":0,"asset_id":"1.3.106"},"settlement_date":"2016-01-04T00:19:54"},"match_price":{"base":{"amount":0,"asset_id":"1.3.106"},"quote":{"amount":0,"asset_id":"1.3.0"}},"max_settlement":{"amount":1375203,"asset_id":"1.3.106"}}
th_a db_market.cpp:261 match
{"next_block.block_num()":2359545}
th_a db_block.cpp:536 _apply_block db_block.cpp:195
This makes sense.The rules of the real DAC are not changed whenever somebody is unhappy with the result of current voting.
If you want to change the rules, you have to make a case that will prove that the new rules produce good and fair results no matter who are the voters or the candidates. The point of this is to have a sufficient mechanism to elect reliable people to change blockchain parameters. Not just this time but every time.
I don't even see any reason why there is a need to decrease Bytemaster's power on blockchain parameters. On the contrary, I would like him to take more active participation on these decisions, because he knows the system best. So far he hasn't changed or proposed any parameters that I would consider harmful for Bitshares.
ya, there are always people that like to live under the rule of a dictator, because he think the dictator is the wisest people he ever met.
but humankind finally select democracy, not because they cannot find wise people to be the ruler, but because they come to understand that unrestricted right will always lead to disaster.
can anyone prove that each time the elected US President is always relied person? no one can prove, but few US people think US need to go back to monarchy, like north Korea. no need to explain.
DAC is not compatible with dictator, we built committee in order to push the decentralization, not to put it under one people's control, I think this is easy to understand.
it's ok for you to trust BM mostly, you can support him by voting, but this is not the consensus of the whole community. the community need a mechanism to avoid dictatorship.
So what am I missing? What would prevent someone from just splitting their stake across multiple accounts to get around this? It seems like a soft rule that is only meaningful to those who choose to stay within the parameters.
1.扩大TCNY生态,争取时代尽快接受TCNY充值。支持。
2.扩大TUSD生态,争取通过合作尽快实现TUSD提现。
3.开拓内外盘间做市,达到一定规模。
推荐人制度木已成舟,不太容易撼动,以我对这帮混蛋的了解,也许只有一个办法可能有用,那就是我首先成为一个比他们更成功的推荐人,为此,我希望能有个钱包自动给被推荐人赠送BTS的程序,实现比如bitcrab自动发送100个BTS给以bitcrab为推荐人注册的用户,每天10个名额。这个程序alt来做的话小菜一碟啊。
继续推进BTS的去中心化,这很难,但很重要,我觉得,要么离开这里,要么正视这个问题,就算是象堂吉诃德大战风车那样也得干,刚刚在论坛发了一个建议:建议限制每个账户最多选3个理事,目的是限制一家独大的账户控制理事会。如果社区反应比较积极,接下去会发BSIP.希望大家能去跟帖表达自己的支持:https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php/topic,20858.0.html从BM代理票数有 4.86%+4.60% 就能看出来,很多人都是一根筋,无条件支持BM的。
Graphic Design / UI/UX Design / Web Development (1.14.28)
TUSD能不能跟NBT做承兑居然有人敢在bts论坛支持NBT? 拖出去。。
A little off topic.. I found your post, don't know how xeroc has helped you though. I replied in that post, wish it helps.Tech issues I'm afraid....Xeroc and several others have very kindly tried to help but no joy.Just for info I'm a brownie holder but not in the list. As I've been unable to import my account yet, I can't tell you if I've received anything, sorry. Anyway hope that helps Ronny.Unable to import, due to lack of privacy or other technical issues?
ok i think the backup file might be from an older version as i'm not sure that i actually managed to run 0.9.1.Do you remember when you made the backup? There is a compatibility issue with v0.4.25-rc2 and later version:
Is there a way to tell from the file itself from what version it originated?
Cannot import wallet backups made with previous versionsIn this case, you can try to install v0.4.24.1 and import your backup, if succeeded, install v0.9.3c directly and make a new backup.
Agree.2.Start selling the collected fees in bitAssets tomorrow...start at 12-15% above feed and lower the price 0.5% every other day...
Yes this makes sense, put all the fee pool bit assets up for sale now at feedprice +15% and drop it each day until it's all sold.
This can be done now, and is nice and simple.
more complex ideas will take time and are less likely to get shareholder support.
Just for info I'm a brownie holder but not in the list. As I've been unable to import my account yet, I can't tell you if I've received anything, sorry. Anyway hope that helps Ronny.Unable to import, due to lack of privacy or other technical issues?
"USD": {"mean": 0.0680436848863721, "median": 0.0034588223011641013, "weighted": 0.32804216106003525}
I believe there is big bug in the GUI asset update page.
today I found that 2 parameters of TCNY have been changed:
issuer_permissions: old:511 new:79
flag:old:128 new:0
after some checking I found what make this happen, in 23th Dec, I operate in GUI to change the owner of TCNY, after doing that, the unexpected change happened.
this can be proved with a test with no confirmation on TUSD, after changing the description and clicking update asset, below pop up:
issuer_permissions and flag are changed to 79 and 0.
this is big bug and may cause big issue, hope everyone be aware of this and this can be fixed asap.
now seems TCNY get unexpected change:
disabled force setting
disabled global force setting by issuer.
disabled confidential transactions
not allow witness/committee members to provide feeds
the worst is that all these features can not be enabled once disabled.
this is really a tragedy for TCNY. , I need to consider how to handle it.
any suggestions?
update_asset_feed_producers TCNY [in.abit,dele-puppy] true
Correct if I'm wrong, but I have the understanding that when shareholders vote for committee, they don't vote only for individual members but for size of the committee also. If everybody votes for only three members, there won't be more than three members in the committee, and that's pretty much centralized then.You're correct on the "also voting for size" point. However there is a hard-coded minimum size of 11. If everybody votes for less than 11 committee members, there will be 11 members.