Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Empirical1.1

Pages: 1 ... 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 [12] 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 ... 59
166
BitCoin needs to pay out $30 million + a month to miners just to sustain it's current CAP not easy in a bear market. It's also a victim of it's own success. The more utility it gains and the more people spend it, the more downward pressure is created as retailers don't hold it due to volatility. So a sale in Bitcoin almost equates to sale of Bitcoin.

BitShares has low inflation costs and retailers will be likely to hold BitAssets more due to their low volatility, privacy and that they pay interest. As each BitAsset requires 300% collateral to create, unlike Bitcoin a little BitAsset demand goes a long way.

BTSX pre-dilution discussions, would already be in XRP territory and ready for the assualt imo.

These last few months have cost us. Our goal now is to get 1.0 out and everything required to use & integrate BitAssets as simple as possible and then market the shit out of it.

Once we rise over $100 million and pass LTC etc. We are the next decentralised alternative to Bitcoin in line for the throne at a stage when Bitcoin is weak. So it's still all to play for.

Crypto is in a bear market, but if we had the demand and interest that Bitcoin has we would be thriving because of low inflation and the nature of BitAssets.


167
General Discussion / Re: [pre-ann] New BitUSD store, looking for feedback
« on: January 04, 2015, 01:35:35 am »
 +5% Very nice :)

168
General Discussion / Re: Default Vote for Core Devs???
« on: January 04, 2015, 12:52:23 am »
I think it did no damage overall. The Bitcointalk thread was more positive than negative for PR overall especially at the end...

I haven't looked at it yet. 

Regardless Bytemaster can carry at least 5 devs. In the sense he can just say these are the 5 guys I and we really need to keep BitShares at the top of it's game.

They will not be without a job and without shareholder support in the next few years. Guaranteed imo.

Edit: Read it, it's not great tbh, one more thing to point too & on a crypto day where positivity not negativity is needed, not the end of the world though. But yeah everyone can appreciate we need a great core dev team that works well together. The majority will default to BM on who's best in that mix for the next year/two at least provided the list is not too big.

169
General Discussion / Re: Default Vote for Core Devs???
« on: January 04, 2015, 12:46:25 am »
Wow just saw this now. Woke up very excited but now see another PR snafu. Again obviously a no go area, running it by an outsider would have raised a red flag immediately.

170
General Discussion / Re: The end of POW approaches...
« on: January 04, 2015, 12:30:39 am »
Fantastic! I love the smell of Napalm in the morning.

If you're the 2nd best poker player in the world and you keep playing the best player you'll likely lose. However if you're a really bad player but you play someone even worse you'll be a winner.

Succeeding is not just about how good you are but how good your competition is.

Our competition has never been more weak, so BitShares relatively speaking has never been more strong than it is right now. So I am maxed out on BitShares again.

As usual, we're not in a great position to attack when an opportunity presents itself :( A few internal issues, still waiting for a website and hopefully 1.0 will be here soon, but

Everything is in play right now. Everything is possible.

With our relative rise will come a spotlight, a spotlight that can counteract a year of bad marketing in a month by explaining BitShares to the world. If LTC drops off the map it will leave a weak Bitcoin hanging & POW very lonely in the top 10.  There we will be the next decentralised alternative in line for the throne. (Our low inflation & the nature of BitAssets mean we will be far superior to them when we get our shot.)

In crisis is opportunity. As the title of the thread says 'The end of POW approaches...'

171
General Discussion / Re: The worth of Stan's contribution to BitShares
« on: January 03, 2015, 04:17:01 pm »
Thanks for all your kind words.  :)

My role on BitShares over the past 18 months has actually been quite modest. 

I work mostly behind the scenes.  My job involves dealing with business operations and other gatekeeper duties typically associated with a chief of staff role. I pay most of the crypto bills. I handle financial, legal and accounting interfaces, written communication functions, partnership negotiations and support, and helping people see the bright side whenever I can. 

Generally I try to take everything I can off Bytemaster’s hands
so he can focus on things that only he can do. 

Someday Bytemaster will find someone else he trusts to do those duties and I will be able to retire.  But it is hard to find someone you can trust to have your back in all situations, especially on the financial and legal fronts.  Until then, if I don’t do these functions he will have to find time to do them himself. 

If I’m the only one he trusts to walk his dog,
then by walking his dog I generate more Bytemaster time for the ecosystem. 

Thus, the value of my contribution is pretty much just the value of Bytemaster’s time saved for things that only he can do. 

**Full disclosure, BM does not own a dog.  I'm using another metaphor.  :D

Stan (and my mother, Pam) have been so critical for my own sanity that BitShares wouldn't be where it is today without them.   Most of their effort is behind the scenes, but if I had to sum it up in a single sentence:
   
  Their job is to keep me out of jail.   

How do they do this?   Careful accounting and hours and hours with lawyers and tax advisors.   

There is NO ONE ELSE at greater legal risk than Stan and Pam because they handle all of our books and Stan is actually an ACTIVE board member / officer of I3.   All of the developers are mere employees or contractors and are shielded from the huge legal risks associated with this industry.   Someone has to bear the risk and right now it falls on Stan & I.

Stan & Pam have been essential in providing necessary liquidity when there were delays converting BTC to USD or unexpected USD bills.  They lent I3 money on several occasions to get through small cash flow issues.   

Stan has done more to free up my time than any other developer.
Stan has also been paid the LEAST salary of every developer.
Stan has also accepted BTS as payment without intent to sell.
Stan has also purchased a large stakes in BTS on top of it all.

In short money cannot buy what Stan & Pam have provided to me and thus BitShares.    At the end of the day Stan was the LEAST compensated of everyone. 

The bonus paid to Stan was really a combined bonus for Pam & Stan.
That makes sense :) Much love :)

Thanks to the OP for giving us the chance to get clear about this. Nothing worse than suppressed concerns / feelings of injustice.

 +5%

172
BitShares is back at no.4 :)

173
Technical Support / Re: Video Tutorials of using BitShares wallets
« on: January 03, 2015, 11:41:11 am »
 +5% Thank you, these are exactly the kind of short videos that can be very useful right now.


174
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: Delegate Proposal: elmato
« on: January 03, 2015, 08:14:23 am »
I'm thinking (hoping) that once they fix the vote function on the new client, voting changes will occur with more speed. It's kind of embarrassing that this takes so long to vote in a delegate like this, but just like Matt608, you will accumulate enough votes over time. Please vote for this guy!

I was helping out with a guy who lost all his balance after voting .
It finally got out , but it was really scary for him .

That always scares me whenever I vote. 'Please come back, please come back...'

We definitely need to vote el mato in though. I don't like getting my stake out of storage frequently though either, not that I'm voting with much. I will vote for el mato though!

175
General Discussion / Re: How to Register a BitShares Account [BLOG POST]
« on: January 03, 2015, 04:40:03 am »
 +5% Nice post

It's not related but I wonder if starting a thread in the altcoin section of Bitcointalk would be useful from a PR and marketing POV something like

BitShares Founder - Ask me anything thread

You will probably get some negativity of course, but it could be a great place to inform, educate and make BitShares feel more accessible to the wider altcoin market

176
Should it not go to $20?
Damn gravity !!!

http://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/paycoin2/#charts

Yes it's good :) No.4 should be ours again soon.

LTC is weak too, trying to pay $2 million to miners a month in a bear market is simply not sustainable.


177
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: Developer delegate: dev.bitsharesblocks
« on: January 03, 2015, 03:36:37 am »
Just want to say BitSharesblocks is looking great, love linking to it in topics, everything is well laid out, clear, it makes us look good. Thanks very much and keep up the great work!

178
General Discussion / Re: The end of POW approaches...
« on: January 03, 2015, 03:17:59 am »
Litecoin seems to be having a bad day might dip below $90 million soon.

PayCoin is also falling hard, was hoping that was just a flash in the pan.

So hopefully we'll be no.4 again soon with a weak POW coming to us.

NXT being strong is actually not bad for our case, (The end of POW) provided we are much stronger.

179
I support core developers making six figures, and I support a single person running several 100% delegates whenever it is required. (or runs their own delegate and gets others to run support delegates)

But strategically I think right now a bad time to begin negotiating salary. It's a debate that is most definitely required in the near future, but can it wait until we have a working full node, a working lightweight client, and a working mobile wallet?

It's a strategically bad time for BitShares but a strategically good time for him. Straight after receiving the bonus but before 1.0

180
General Discussion / Re: Nxt is up 12% News?
« on: January 03, 2015, 02:18:28 am »
I can't see anything worthy enough for such a big move. Intriguing.

I don't understand its value proposition, but Nxt is up because of their "monetary system" launch.

Sent from my SCH-S720C using Tapatalk 2

 +5% Cool. I remember them talking about it ages ago. At the time it didn't sound very interesting, maybe I'll try look into it more.

Ok, saw article, I remember it just lets you lock a certain amount of NXT collateral up or something but it didn't seem like that would let you peg to anything as the price of NXT is obviously volatile.

Pages: 1 ... 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 [12] 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 ... 59