please notice what I say
why not after you do good effort and wait btser to vote . I think if you do really useful work to bts, they must vote support to your worker.
then please explain to me what alt / baozi is doing just now. I certainly does not recognize any value brought to the ecosystem.
If this goes on .. and more shareholders support him .. he could essential force the network to stand still in development ..
I thought that was the exact assurance when BM introduced the dilution : If shareholders do not like the inflation rate , they can vote against it .
On a side note , false development is no development at all . ( dilution and tons of AGS fund has funded a lot of things in 1.0 , and none of it was worth it because by the dev's own word ------1.0 was not usable to users . And graphene was paid by the developer's own dime. ) False development meaning development that just for "workers' sake" instead of those work that's really needed and will have lasting effect on the project instead of every work that has been paid and then be abandoned and move on to another new direction .
I guess he has just seen false development funded by dilution too much .
But then again , the doubt is bound to happen after failing to see result generated from dilution after one year whose effect has been devastating on the marketcap . "Marketcap will rise if you let us dilute and keep developing" , which was also the only reason that the stakeholders allowed changing the allocation schedule and ruined the reputation of BitShares in the first place . So ........ Is this objection really that surprising to you ?