Using the current rationale, this requires someone else run it for me as it is literally impossible for me (or many others) to run them on their ownand keep up with the people like xeroc, gamey and riverhead (among others) whonhave literally 20+ years of experience doing so. So I could then be seen as offering kickbacks to someone who runs the delegate for me. Is this not the case?
And if they are not paid for this, are they going to be seen as requiring other ...more secret forms of payment in the form of special favors?
This choice gives assumes their are only 3 viable options:
1) compete by running running it purely by myself without years of experience in system/network administration, spending my time to gain those skills as opposed to doing what im currently doing, or
2) go without pay
3) have someone else run it for me, but open myself up to literally the same criticisms...only with the added downside of putting the funding of this decentralized project at risk by giving it a (pretty big) central point of failure.
Can you explain what other options im not seeing? Perhaps this is an exercise in vacuity. Speaking of which, tony take your discussion of my impaired judgment to this thread/poll.
https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=11471.0While you are there, make a vote as the only one against this grass roots marketing and community building effort for the DAC that kindly went far above and beyond the designated 10% PTS and 10% AGS to sharedrop far in excess of what was required by social consensus.
I am trying to infuse our ecosystem with new people and for the first time have been trusted with what I would consider a pretty large allotment to get it done. It was done with funds set aside precisely for this reason and in no way ever belonging to you, me, or anyone but those who intend to use it specifically for promotions. Can you please give up on this silliness? It isnt even a viable argument given the topic of discussion this post was made incite.