3481
中文 (Chinese) / Re: 当前的爆仓规则
« on: January 04, 2016, 02:20:01 pm »
突然又想到,如果以后内盘流动性比外盘大了,是不是就不该用喂价了?或者把内盘价也加入来算喂价?
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
I can't get v0.4.24.1 to run so that i can import my backup. Every time i try to open the application it crashes immediately. Any ideas? Boy do i wish i'd started this adventure on a Mac!Some options:
if you have bitcrab1, bitcrab2, bitcrab3, bitcrab4, bitcrab5... on top eleven, I'm sure BM will change the rule immediatelySounds interesting.. Just do it!
WORKER就像是大家一起凑钱修路。神马是FBAabit也申请吧worker太高调了,我对FBA更感兴趣一点。顺利的话过一阵搞一个出来。
我还有成千上万的BTS,我全力支持你
I thought down votes are only for workers..QuoteAlso, isn't the voting mechamism for witnesses same as it is for committee? If so, then we would have to also prevent shareholders for voting more than three witnesses.Almost: you cannot downvote witnesses, but could for committee members (afaik)
I've spent a lot of time investigating this and going over every line of code in the clear_expired_orders(). I can't find the problem from inspecting the code, and I do not have any way to reproduce it reliably. If someone can provide specific steps or a specific datadir to reproduce it, I might be able to make progress in the investigation.Today Alt and I did some tests with latest Release build and most recent chain data.
abit也申请吧worker太高调了,我对FBA更感兴趣一点。顺利的话过一阵搞一个出来。
我还有成千上万的BTS,我全力支持你
了解了是还有些人的BOTFUND没有claim,就没有办法计算和进行分红。参见http://cryptofresh.com/a/BOTFUND一月一次还行,另外现在手续费下降了一点。但是现在最大的障碍是还有些(大概1000+)BOTFUND没有claim.什么问题?最新版的钱包应该都可以claim了
什么问题?最新版的钱包应该都可以claim了话说分红不是要转账费么?还是挂单回购方式费用低吧。
一月一次还行,另外现在手续费下降了一点。但是现在最大的障碍是还有些(大概1000+)BOTFUND没有claim.
@2031654 最左菜单列选voting-》proxy里填上bitcrab,然后PUBLISH CHANGES就好,谢了。原来你用英文版。
--checkpoint '[2359545,"002400f965e4ad8b494d48dfb8d311d59cd771bc"]' -s "114.92.254.159:62015"
(maybe the checkpoint is not needed here)--enable-stale-production --checkpoint '[2359545,"0000000000000000000000000000000000000000"]'
locked >>> get_block 2359545
get_block 2359545
{
"previous": "002400f85a7d07a722f801b839c75f89a4f55e67",
"timestamp": "2016-01-04T02:08:30",
"witness": "1.6.35",
"transaction_merkle_root": "0000000000000000000000000000000000000000",
"extensions": [],
"witness_signature": "1f43e7663aa4f9f204506a7e29ae2c13b4a2d064444f635c644cd451f6fba132622a79c39a9785624b3953dff0eac5853c2f18195622b63861d188279161d44667",
"transactions": [],
"block_id": "002400f965e4ad8b494d48dfb8d311d59cd771bc",
"signing_key": "BTS83K3qNNZBRLWMa6pXcwnfMJqC9J46ZpMFEYDKUDCNy2BgNrWth",
"transaction_ids": []
}
--checkpoint '[2359545,"002400f965e4ad8b494d48dfb8d311d59cd771bc"]'
Any witnesses willing to help try an untested patch can update to the latest master on github.Building.
I am not a witness so I cannot verify if this fixes block production or not. You may have to specify a checkpoint.
--checkpoint '[2359545,"002400f965e4ad8b494d48dfb8d311d59cd771bc"]'
Make a proposal please?so, committee members, do you have something here with proposal potential?I agree we should use the fund to support liquility.
@mindphlux @BunkerChain Labs @baozi @bitcrab
and I agree tony's advice