2491
Random Discussion / Re: cryptocurrency forums filters
« on: February 14, 2014, 11:54:00 am »
Cool.
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
servers in a private bunker in the Swiss alps.
To what extent is it possible to generalize this to collect any empirical information? I've only seen this thread on the matter so far.
A Sensor DAC could work so long as their was a prediction market attached to each sensor that predicted the reliability of that sensor. The sensor would publish a signed data feed and the market would price the trustworthiness of that feed.
Anyone with a competing Sensor could then have an automated trading bot that attempts to gain first-mover advantage by shorting other sensors that disagree with it.
Allow anyone to setup automated trading bots that attempt to make money detecting bad sensors and the DAC would have a valid, trustworthy set of data feeds.
My evaluation of DACs starts with:..
1) Business Model
- all dacs have one primary business model, transactions
- so a business model is really a set of transactions supported
2) Profitability (same business model can have different levels of profit)
3) Security Model (POW vs POS vs Consensus)
4) Scalability
5) Economic Principles
- free market, socialist, anti-hoarding, voting
Then there is the tools available to DACs:..
1) Market Mechanisms (prediction markets and trading algorithms)
2) Auctions
3) Issuing Shares
4) Dividends
5) Nash Equilibrium
6) Multisig
7) Swaps
8.) Options
9) Interest
QuoteWhen you create a DAC with Bitshares you have 100% of the shares to allocate to the potential users. If you promise to allocate 20% of these shares, 10% to AGS (AngelShares) and 10% to PTS (ProtoShares) you get the services listed, plus a lot of support from the community.
When does the promise have to be made? Do I wait to allocate the 20% until such time as I am ready for the services?