Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - lafona

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 [8] 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
106
General Discussion / Re: Alternative Network Protocol - Testers Wanted
« on: September 09, 2015, 12:18:44 pm »
Got stuck in same place overnight.

Code: [Select]
  "head_block_num": 123659,
  "head_block_id": "0001e30bae565a49fa6a29f751dadead994fd312",
  "head_block_age": "7 hours old",
  "next_maintenance_time": "7 hours ago",
  "chain_id": "ecbde738ba0b319cb4d266e613b200d010da8b37313c20aec03f9c8e2d9b35e3",
  "participation": "82.81250000000000000",

107
General Discussion / Re: Prediction Game of BTS market cap by the time of snapshot
« on: September 09, 2015, 03:19:41 am »
Are "The price is right" rules in effect?

108
General Discussion / Re: Alternative Network Protocol - Testers Wanted
« on: September 09, 2015, 03:04:44 am »
not sure if this helps but I ran
Code: [Select]
nodejs bootstrap.js from the
Code: [Select]
/graphene-ui/relay directory

109
General Discussion / Re: Alternative Network Protocol - Testers Wanted
« on: September 09, 2015, 12:07:52 am »
My witness is up and producing blocks using the jscript method. I was getting this error message for a while, but it has stopped now that the blocks have caught up.
Also I think I built from commit a748883fed08a73afaec647e2e8827d07ca3c163 (still learning git, used "git show" in graphene directory)

Code: [Select]
!!! GrapheneApi error:  broadcast_block [ { previous: '0001d8a6de1024e6b4a7105304cd54fc1504c300',
    timestamp: '2015-09-08T23:55:35',
    witness: '1.6.51',
    transaction_merkle_root: '0000000000000000000000000000000000000000',
    extensions: [],
    witness_signature: '1f427c6e912ce2fcd712baf356e37fe1bc5f6b09736fcb500bda3d73450d4119ad442af6b640182618da8095a0a6cdb12aa7e5f42ab029c0ca7e00f8910336318c',
    transactions: [] } ] { code: 1,
  message: '10 assert_exception: Assert Exception\nitem->num > std::max<int64_t>( 0, int64_t(_head->num) - (_max_size) ): attempting to push a block that is too old\n    {"item->num":120999,"head":121012,"max_size":13}\n    th_a  fork_database.cpp:70 _push_block\n\n    {"new_block":{"previous":"0001d8a6de1024e6b4a7105304cd54fc1504c300","timestamp":"2015-09-08T23:55:35","witness":"1.6.51","transaction_merkle_root":"0000000000000000000000000000000000000000","extensions":[],"witness_signature":"1f427c6e912ce2fcd712baf356e37fe1bc5f6b09736fcb500bda3d73450d4119ad442af6b640182618da8095a0a6cdb12aa7e5f42ab029c0ca7e00f8910336318c","transactions":[]}}\n    th_a  db_block.cpp:176 _push_block',
  data:
   { code: 10,
     name: 'assert_exception',
     message: 'Assert Exception',
     stack: [ [Object], [Object] ] } }
on UpstreamBlock error:  { code: 1,
  message: '10 assert_exception: Assert Exception\nitem->num > std::max<int64_t>( 0, int64_t(_head->num) - (_max_size) ): attempting to push a block that is too old\n    {"item->num":120999,"head":121012,"max_size":13}\n    th_a  fork_database.cpp:70 _push_block\n\n    {"new_block":{"previous":"0001d8a6de1024e6b4a7105304cd54fc1504c300","timestamp":"2015-09-08T23:55:35","witness":"1.6.51","transaction_merkle_root":"0000000000000000000000000000000000000000","extensions":[],"witness_signature":"1f427c6e912ce2fcd712baf356e37fe1bc5f6b09736fcb500bda3d73450d4119ad442af6b640182618da8095a0a6cdb12aa7e5f42ab029c0ca7e00f8910336318c","transactions":[]}}\n    th_a  db_block.cpp:176 _push_block',
  data:
   { code: 10,
     name: 'assert_exception',
     message: 'Assert Exception',
     stack: [ [Object], [Object] ] } }

110
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: Funds from chronos.payroll.lafona to be sent to BM for bitshares development
« on: September 07, 2015, 02:00:29 am »
Just wanted to bump this post to allow everyone to make an informed decision.

111
General Discussion / Re: Margin called on bitUSD short while expired - What happens?
« on: September 07, 2015, 12:42:19 am »
From what understand you short went into the massive buywall at the feed price when it expired. If the feed price went above your call price, then your order would execute at up to 10 percent above the price, representing a ten percent penalty. Afaik that penalty should only occur if your price is still lower than the feed price. Otherwise your short is just part of the buywall at the feed price.

So yes you should be able to buy back for a profit assuming nobody took advantage of the ten percent discount when your short was margin called.

112
Stakeholder Proposals / Funds from chronos.payroll.lafona to be sent to BM for bitshares development
« on: September 04, 2015, 12:14:47 am »
As many of you may know from the other thread https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php/topic,16536.0.html, chronos has stepped down and will no longer be paid by this delegate. Suggestions were made to burn the funds or to give them to bytemaster to use for bitshares development. Since the forum is not the best option for polling in my opinion, I would like to the community to express their opinion by voting for or against the delegate. To keep this as simple as possible, if the delegate is still voted in at the end of the new pay period(end of the 15th of September) the funds will go to BM. If it is voted out before then, then I will burn the funds collected after chronos's last payment. With the changes in the delegate line up that have been happening over the past few weeks, it shouldn't be a problem to vote out the delegate if enough people are against the continued dilution. To give everyone a chance to see this and decide for themselves, I will try to bump the thread occasionally. As usual, feel free to discuss or ask any questions here.

113
General Discussion / Re: Test Net for Advanced Users
« on: September 03, 2015, 10:09:33 pm »
would there be any benefit spamming from multiple accounts? I have some time tonight and could join the party, I just don't have any core. I have my delegate on a vps and would be spamming from my home computer. Also puppies, are you using the flood network command or the script you wrote?

114
General Discussion / Re: Test Net for Advanced Users
« on: September 02, 2015, 03:11:19 am »
I keep getting this occasionally and it seems like it still isnt producing blocks. Does the
Code: [Select]
schedule_production_ ] now.time_since_epoch().count(): 1441163103861438 next_second: 2015-09-02T03:05:05represent a missed block

Code: [Select]
247252ms th_a       application.cpp:356           handle_block         ] Got block #20775 from network
252263ms th_a       application.cpp:356           handle_block         ] Got block #20776 from network
257272ms th_a       application.cpp:356           handle_block         ] Got block #20777 from network
262655ms th_a       application.cpp:356           handle_block         ] Got block #20778 from network
266000ms th_a       witness.cpp:223               block_production_loo ] Not producing block because slot has not yet arrived
266000ms th_a       witness.cpp:187               schedule_production_ ] now.time_since_epoch().count(): 1441163103861438 next_second: 2015-09-02T03:05:05
282256ms th_a       application.cpp:356           handle_block         ] Got block #20779 from network
287257ms th_a       application.cpp:356           handle_block         ] Got block #20780 from network
292260ms th_a       application.cpp:356           handle_block         ] Got block #20781 from network
297254ms th_a       application.cpp:356           handle_block         ] Got block #20782 from network

115
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: 100% - Delegate for Chronos
« on: September 02, 2015, 02:53:08 am »
Since there is support for letting BM use the funds for development, I think the simplest way to go forward is make that the plan for this delegate. If people really don't want the dilution they can still vote the delegate out. Essentially they would have two weeks before the end of the next biweekly pay period. Based on the recent delegate movements, I don't think that it would be a problem if that is what the community really wants. To make sure everyone is aware I will make a new thread with the subject describing the reallocation of funds. If it gets voted out during that period I can burn the 97% that was collected after chronos' last payment. I think this should be a reasonable way to continue without making additional yes no accounts which would just sit idle after this one use. Hopefully this is ok with everyone.

116
General Discussion / Re: Test Net for Advanced Users
« on: September 02, 2015, 02:08:06 am »
delegate-1.lafona (1.6.1531) is up and ready. Would someone mind voting me in, I am having no luck finding a key with a balance worth more than 0.1 core.

117
DAC PLAY / New play release with hardfork at 1340000
« on: September 01, 2015, 02:56:28 am »
Just a heads up there was another release (0.3.3) with a planned hardfork at 1340000.

https://github.com/dacsunlimited/dac_play/releases

118
General Discussion / Re: Test Net for Advanced Users
« on: September 01, 2015, 12:08:05 am »
Anyone else getting this when trying to update the submodule

Code: [Select]
fatal: reference is not a tree: 80d967a70d21d26d27ef3a1544a177925b2a7bbe
Unable to checkout '80d967a70d21d26d27ef3a1544a177925b2a7bbe' in submodule path 'libraries/fc'

119
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: 100% - Delegate for Chronos
« on: August 31, 2015, 04:37:10 pm »
Ok, while personally I would send the funds to BM if he has a use for them. (If it in any speeds up the process to 2.0, it would be worth it). But that is only one vote or opinion out of many.  Would it be worth making two 0% delegates as a way to vote yes/no for this? I have no problem with either approach, but I would like to have a good idea of the stance of the community. I guess this is similiar to the issue Thom had a few weeks ago with verbaltech.

120
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: 100% - Delegate for Chronos
« on: August 31, 2015, 04:10:33 pm »
I have no problem running the delegate at 3% from here on out. Depending on what sounds reasonable I can burn the remaining 97% on a weekly, biweekly or monthly basis. I can also update the thread here with the payment split and burn info.

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 [8] 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16

Page created in 0.023 seconds with 23 queries.