what about something like this

A: holds 1.000 BTSX, but has no intention to buy or sell bitAssets
B: holds 1.000 BTSX too, but he want to buy or sell bitAssets

now A "lends" B 1.000 BTSX with the promise to give him 10 BTSX a month (>12% interest a year)
B now "controls" 2.000 BTSX but can't sell the borrowed BTSX but can invest in bitAssets

so B buy now bitUSD for 2.000 BTSX and hopes to make a profit.

1. if B makes a profit both parties wins with this deal
2. if B makes a loss he will loose much more, because he invested "leveraged" . the BTSX client should prefend a loss for A. Say if the invest of B gets the wrong way his own BTSX are converted to the "borrowed" BTSX account. If he holds only 25% of the borrowed BTSX as own BTSX his contract with A will get automatically terminated.

with this kind of system more parties could be interested in BTSX - lenders and traders

i would love to have 60 million BTSX, but if i had so much i would not sell now it is to early, because the chances to hit a homerun are still here. I hope we see one  

it was really nice . thanks

i will take good care for the 50 btsx

from

ttp://prestonbyrne.com/

I’m an associate lawyer with Norton Rose Fulbright’s London office, a fellow of the Adam Smith Institute, and a co-founder of Project Ðouglas and Eris Industries.

My primary practice (securitisation) consists mainly of advising on a range of asset-backed transactions including CMBS, RMBS, covered bonds, esoteric ABS such as utilities and transport, and credit support/risk transfer arrangements including single-tranche and portfolio guarantees. The securitisation team regularly acts for a broad cross-section of public and private sector industry participants, including issuers, trustees, borrowers, guarantors and investors.

As to cryptocurrency and decentralised computing (crypto), I’m currently focusing on industrial uses for blockchains – particularly commercial applications for smart contracts/DAOs. I consult regularly with established industrial enterprises, developers and entrepreneurs in the space, both within my practice and independently. If you’re in the field and have a business or legal query, please feel free to get in touch – my contact details are at the bottom of this page. I’d be happy to hear from you.

Uniquely among global law firms, Norton Rose Fulbright has an active international crypto practice, and the firm represents a range of clients in the space. We regularly advise on domestic or cross-border business issues encountered in the industry, whether in relation to (i) tax, (ii) insolvency, (iii) corporate formation and governance, (iv) intellectual property,  (v) crowdfunding, payment services or other financial regulation, (vi) KYC and AML, (vii) litigation, (viii) structuring and securities, or (ix) venture capital financing from the firm’s network of offices in over 50 cities worldwide.

As to the ASI, my current interests include housing reform and alternative finance – including, naturally, cryptocurrency, on which I regularly blog, give talks or provide press comment.

All views expressed on this website are solely my own. They do not represent the views of Norton Rose Fulbright or the Adam Smith Institute.

now i read his blog post. sry, i just read from the start insults to the whole projects. that's piss me off. He claims he is a lawyer, but who can expect fairness from a lawyer?

My primary practice (securitisation) consists mainly of advising on a range of asset-backed transactions including CMBS, RMBS, covered bonds, esoteric ABS such as utilities and transport, and credit support/risk transfer arrangements including single-tranche and portfolio guarantees. The securitisation team regularly acts for a broad cross-section of public and private sector industry participants, including issuers, trustees, borrowers, guarantors and investors.

sry, i am just laughing loud. he is one of this over paid guys who fucked up the whole planet and just pretend they saved us all. he can not be on "our" side, because he gets paid from people they are totally against crypto, bitcoin 2.0 and so on. it would be to ask Ben Bernanke if this project can success. He will tell "no".

the answer is on the field, so just wait and smash us later.

would strengthens poloniex position in the bts community, because this would provide big time value for the people that hold PTS at their exchange. they should consider to take part in every snapshot for PTS and other bts products. just look at bter and btc38, they got a huge advantage to do it. Now, i don't need to remove my PTS from their exchange when i am lazy.

i would like to have some payment for the following 102-202 delegates on the list. In a time of an DDoS attack or something with this magnitute. What about to pay some of the fees to this "standby" delegates? In the long run we need something like this to replace a delegate fast. what do you think?

upgraded to 200 is nice

Bitcointalk : Tradingriver
reddit : bitshareshub