Don't hold on to your "logical thinking learned from BM" .
BM said low fee is good for the long term for BTS last year .
BM said fixed supply and burned fee are good for BTS last year .
Now BM said high fee is good for BTS in the long term .
Now BM said dilution is our competitive advantage .
What's gonna be next ?
Business are not about wishful "logical thinking" . It's about the facts .
"More dilution , more development , the price will rise" is a logical assumption by wishful thinking , but it's a fallacy .Same as high referral fees for a speculative object to hope to sustain its price .
Just because you want one logical to happen , doesn't mean it will happen . And wishful thinking with fixed logical is the exact definition of SPECULATION .
These represent my own thoughts I've actually not liked some of Dan's decisions. The fact you don't agree with my opinion doesn't mean I'm someone else's minion, that just adds to the lack of arguments.
I don't agree with low fees and fees on the first version were ridiculously low it didn't even make sense.
I've believe I've never contradicted myself about the dilution, unless you'd like to waist some time of your life and go search. Otherwise don't put words on my mouth. Stick to yours.
I've always tried to maintain neutral on that matter because I was never able to fully support either one decision or other. Fixed + burn supply is good like Bitcoin simply because that's what people are used to.
Dilution allows you to be more flexible than any other platform out there, there's a reason real companies use that. However it can also be dangerous if not used wisely.
What did I even say that is wishful thinking? I stated that people like to complain and lower fees, however they won't put their money where their mouth is. It's not proven lower fees will actually increase the transactions so much that will make it worth. I'm being rational here. If that was the case, I would be all for it, lower the fees the a fraction of a fraction of a cent, as long as the DAC is profitable.
Wishful thinking is lowering fees and not causing the volume to go up. You know why? Because if you ever raise the fees again, now then you're screwed.
As for your last quote:
"Just because you want one logical to happen , doesn't mean it will happen . And wishful thinking with fixed logical is the exact definition of SPECULATION ."
Congratulations
you just described whoever supports lower fees
Am I really just full of wishful thinking? Let me see, half of what you wrote doesn't make sense as it's just a form of senseless attacks based on a clear lack of arguments. Then, it's already proven that lower fees don't have any impact as see in the first version (even though it was not that usable). You want facts and condemn wishful thinking when you're doing exactly the opposite. Please.
And learn to chill please. The fact you're pissed about Dan's decisions doesn't concern me the least, nor do you have to make it seem that I follow every decision blindly when I didn't. You want facts but don't get yours straight.
But now on a positive note, you don't need to be that worried about Dan's or other people's decisions because you can vote on worker proposals
So feel free to vote on whatever makes you happy - including lowering the fees (if that's the case) - while not having any plan to use them to the DACs advantage, because whoever supports it just does on a whim, doesn't bring anything new to the table and simply can't justify why they want to do with the exception of "brings more volume". Awesome. Then go and start to brainstorm on worker proposals that take advantage of lower fees. Ops, we've seen none. Seems like wishful thinking.
Edit: Now it seems this was just a long useless rant because I've only noticed what you just posted as a reply to my post, doesn't even make sense.
Tldr: you're saying people are just wishful thinking when they have plans on the future and can clearly take advantage of higher fees to build something and bring in value while making it seem the "facts" are on the side of who wants to lower fees, based on absolute no plans. I'll add this to my definition of irony.