106
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: Bitsharesblocks Translations: 10 bitUSD + 500 BTS per language
« on: December 02, 2014, 02:43:29 pm »
Great, I'm doing the Spanish translation. Will be done in 24-48 hs.
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
In a few years it's going to be full of early adopters bragging about the cool mansions they bought with their new found riches.
Indeed. This is my primary reason for posting things like the superBULL thread.
In a few years, I want people to be able to go: "holy crap, look at those early adopters who were worried about whether the price would go from 2 cents to 1 or 5, and now its <crazy high price>!"
This is the kind of 100% delegate I would vote for .
"Upgrading PTS to DPOS has been planned for a long time, only nobody at I3 had the time to do it."
If this was the intent of I3 then why did they very deliberately kill BitsharesPTS in order to merge it's value into BTS?
"From a purely technical perspective of course we're starting a new chain with a genesis block based on a snapshot from the old chain. There's really no other way to do it."
You want to start a new social consensus blockchain based on the Bitshares toolkit and airdrop on former PTS holders..that's it in a nutshell. That part I have no problem with. The problem is you state that future DAC's using the Bitshares toolkit are "invited" to honor your new social consensus but why would they? Because you have fraudulently called yourself the "new" BitsharesPTS. This looks like a copy and paste, pump and dump trading off a dead coin's brand and hijacked name...crypto coat-tail riding. And your response it "there's no other way to do it?".
"You can stay on the PoW chain and see where it leads. Most likely it won't lead anywhere but simply stop in its tracks."
THAT WAS THE INTENTION. That was the whole purpose of merging PTS, AGS and all the others. So that there would be one place to snapshot for future DAC's wanting to honor the social consensus. BTS is what represents the Bitshares community not what you're doing. Your blockchain might have a use to some other crypto community but we are already united behind BTS.
"Therefore, the upgrade is mandatory from an economical perspective."
That's like saying "here, I'm going to give you some free crypto in my new unrelated blockchain and you should take it because it's mandatory from an economic perspective." Try to understand, you are not updating PTS, PTS is DEAD..thus you are not adding value to it, because it no longer exists. It's value has been transferred to BTS. You are squatting on the name.
One final thing. You used the Bitshares toolkit to make your blockchain but are you honoring AGS holders? If not, you are violating the social consensus you purport to uphold.