I guess this was all bullshit then?
"CCEDK has become the first exchange in the world to make its books completely transparent – using the same public ledger philosophy that made Bitcoin so successful. 'You don’t have to worry about our exchange being hacked or whether it is honest or solvent. Everything about our new accounts will be an open book and you control the keys to your own funds, even while they are on our exchange.'"
https://bitshares.org/blog/2015/06/16/danish-firm-set-to-revolutionize-cryptocurrency-industry/
Why?
Rome was not built in one day as you know, and this whole process is not done overnight but needs done in steps.
Right now if all users move their funds to OpenLedger from CCEDK, then you have basically what i mentioned in all articles, so it is really up to you and anyone else to decide where you want to trade, which has been the intention with this from the first place.
I think if all look into this being positive about all changes whether quick or slow, then progress happens in fact will happen much faster, and you are yourself an active part of making this happen.
And why complain about a project which have not even gotten off yet? You have still some 400-700 million bts stuck on btc38 and many bts holder still not migrating yet, and you want things to be perfect right off the bat? It is obvious that whatever we do from our side is only a small part in all of this, atleast for the time being and we are okay with this as we belive in growing with the community.
You do have one point though. At the time of that article you refer to, it was still not clear udner which name the decentralized platform was to be presented. With a great amount of comments from the BItshares community commenting and saying CCEDK was not the right name for a platform like this, we came up with the name OpenLedger. For anyone reading the media later on, there is no place where it says Openledger and CCEDK is one and same exchange, but instead we are saying that OpenLeger is what CCEDK would like to be in future or that CCEDK is supporting Openledger in all the ways possible with legal framework for the fiat gateway etc, and time will show if we can manage to move it all to Openledger. For now it is impossible as the NanoCard finally being activated end of coming week will be based on bitcoin and will need CCEDK as the base exchange for that.
The idea will then be in future to add NanoCard to OpenLedger with the support of Smartcoins, again depending on the support from the BitShares community. How do you imagine NanoCard to be added as a useful and valuablæe tool of Openledger is there is no liquidity and market depth provided from its users in the first place? That would be bad business, and we dont plan on oing any bad business, but invest in the future.
Sorry, if I cannot continue here, as I have urgent matters to attend., but from end of this coming weeek we will start creating a hangout for openledger with special focus on how to bring the news out to the rest of the world